Leave to Intervene

Useful Rulings on Leave to Intervene

Recent Rulings on Leave to Intervene

AMERICAN CLAIMS MANAGEMENT INC VS MEMOS SCAFFOLDING NORWALK

., for Everest National Insurance Company as real party in interest, filed this action against Defendants Memo’s Scaffolding Norwalk, Inc. and Bernard’s Construction Group, Inc. for damages arising out of a workplace accident that injured Jose Luis Guzman. Jose Luiz Guzman, as plaintiff in intervention, brings claims against Memo’s Scaffolding Norwalk, Inc., Bernard’s Construction Group, Inc., and Selma and Vine North Hollywood LLC for damages arising out of the same accident.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

RAFAEL TORRES, AN INDIVIDUAL VS TECHNION CONTRACTORS TCI, INC., A CORPORATION

On 11/14/19, Great Divide Insurance Co and its Third-Party Administrator Berkley Entertainment (collectively, “Intervenor”) filed a Complaint in Intervention. Intervenor asserts that its insured, Asbestos Instant Response, Inc. dba Air Demolition & Environmental Solutions ("AIR''), was Plaintiff’s employer when the subject incident occurred.

  • Hearing

    Aug 11, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY VS GUILLERMO ANDRES GUZMAN

MOTION TO INTERVENE (CCP § 387) TENTATIVE RULING: Proposed Intervenor Loya Casualty Insurance Company’s Motion for Leave to Intervene is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ANALYSIS: On June 4, 2019, Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action for automobile subrogation against Defendant Guillermo Andres Guzman (“Defendant”).

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

JG WENTWORTH ORIGINATIONS LLC VS DAVIS

Insurance Code § 10139.5 governs transfers of payments due to payees under structured settlements.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

LUCERO VS. CLARK

The Motion by Defendant Janessa Clark and Intervenor State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company for summary adjudication as to Plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages is GRANTED. Defendant’s objections numbers 1 and 3-8 are overruled; Defendant’s objections numbers 2 and 9-10 are sustained. A prayer for Punitive Damages is authorized by California Civil Code section. 3294(a).

  • Hearing

    Aug 07, 2020

RICHARD EUGENE SANFORD VS TIFFANY GOMEZ

On January 30, 2020, Insurance Company of the West filed duplicative motions for leave to intervene pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure, section 387. On March 18, 2020, the Court continued the hearing on the motion for leave to intervene to May 12, 2020. On April 17, 2020, the Court continued the hearing on the motion for leave to intervene to August 7, 2020. Trial is set for February 16, 2021.

  • Hearing

    Aug 07, 2020

ANTONIO STEWART VS PROSUM, INC.

State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. (1975) 14 Cal.3d 473, 479. Such enforcement may be sought by a party to the arbitration agreement. Code Civ. Proc., § 1280, subd. (e)(1). The petition to compel arbitration functions as a motion and is to be heard in the manner of a motion, i.e., the facts are to be proven by affidavit or declaration and documentary evidence with oral testimony taken only in the court’s discretion. Code Civ. Proc., § 1290.2; Rosenthal v. Great Western Fin.

  • Hearing

    Aug 07, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

SAMVEL HARUTYUNYAN, ET AL. VS REGINA QUIROZ, ET AL.

On April 13, 2020, Rental Insurance Services, Inc. filed a motion for leave to intervene pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure, section 387. On April 17, 2020, the Court continued the hearing on the motion for leave to intervene to August 7, 2020. Trial is set for March 18, 2021. PARTY’S REQUESTS Rental Insurance Services, Inc.

  • Hearing

    Aug 07, 2020

HAZARABEDIAN VS. CANTOR GROUP

HEARING ON MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO INTERVENE FILED BY CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY * TENTATIVE RULING: * Granted. No opposition.

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

CITRUS OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLGY VS CITRUS VALLEY HEALTH

During about the same period, Emanate intervened with Plaintiff’s clients AltaMed and Central City and signed contracts to provide OB/GYN services in place of Plaintiff, including through Plaintiff’s former physicians Begley, Escamillo and Terai-Escamillo. (Id., ¶50.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

JACQUELINE CANNON VS MANDY KOFSKY, ET AL.

The unopposed Motion by to Intervene by Safeco Insurance Company of America is GRANTED. Intervention is proper where the intervenor shows an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede that person’s ability to protect the interest. Cal Code Civil Procedure § 387(b). An insurer may intervene in a case where the insured fails to defend to avoid harm to the insurer. Western Heritage Ins. Co. v.

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

CERVANTES V. CORDOVA

Everest National Insurance Company’s (“Everest”) Motion for Leave to intervene is GRANTED. Everest is directed to cause a copy of its Complaint in Intervention to be filed within the records of this action, as a separate and standalone document. Everest is directed to proceed diligently with dismissal of the duplicative lawsuit in Los Angeles County. The Court takes judicial notice of the related case, Everest National Insurance Company v. Festo Corporation, Los Angeles Superior Court Case # 19STCV25748.

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

CITRUS OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLGY VS CITRUS VALLEY HEALTH

During about the same period, Emanate intervened with Plaintiff’s clients AltaMed and Central City and signed contracts to provide OB/GYN services in place of Plaintiff, including through Plaintiff’s former physicians Begley, Escamillo and Terai-Escamillo. (Id., ¶50.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

JACQUELINE CANNON VS MANDY KOFSKY, ET AL.

The unopposed Motion by to Intervene by Safeco Insurance Company of America is GRANTED. Answer in-intervention to be filed within 10-days. Intervention is proper where the intervenor shows an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede that person’s ability to protect the interest. Cal Code Civil Procedure § 387(b).

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

LON DAUGHERTY VS DOE DEFENDANTS 1 TO 100

.: BC686988 Hearing Date: August 6, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion for leave to file complaint in intervention Plaintiff Lon Daugherty (“Plaintiff”) filed this action after he was injured by a dock leveler. Now, Technology Insurance Company (“Intervenor”) seeks leave to intervene per Labor Code section 3852 because it paid workers’ compensation benefits to Plaintiff. Defendant Vortex Industries, Inc. (“Defendant”) opposes the motion.

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

PNRW, LLC., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, VS TROON, INC, ET AL.

Accordingly, Norouzi does not satisfy the requirements for a motion for leave to intervene, as Nourozi is not a non-party. (Code of Civil Procedure § 387(b) (“An intervention takes place when a nonparty, deemed an intervenor, becomes a party to an action or proceeding between other persons . . .”) (emphasis added).) Leave to intervene is thus improperly sought here. Norouzi may follow the procedures in the Code of Civil Procedure to file his proposed Cross-Complaint attached to the motion.

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

LETICIA GOLPEO VS. FAST TAXI

Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, the motion of Proposed Intervenor OBI National Insurance Company ("Proposed Intervenor") for leave to intervene is GRANTED. The Court finds good cause for intervention given the absence of opposition and the fact that Proposed Intervenor seeks to protect its interest by defending its insured, a suspended corporation. This case has been assigned to Department 47 for hearing.

  • Hearing

    Aug 05, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION V. FAIRFIELD IMPORTS, LLC,

Intervenor BMO holds the junior lien. The fact that this sale was actually completed given the many challenges should not be undervalued by any party, especially BMO who benefitted from the package sale. The fact that the deal closed on the cusp of an unprecedented pandemic is extraordinary.

  • Hearing

    Aug 05, 2020

PABLO CABRAL VS GRAND PACIFIC 7-28 LLC

On March 20, 2020, Plaintiff-in-Intervention Granite State Insurance Company filed an amendment to its complaint renaming Doe 1 as Defendant Naya Services, Inc. On April 1, 2020, the Court dismissed Defendant/Cross-Complainant Grand Pacific 7-28, LLC from Plaintiff-in-Intervention Granite State Insurance Company’s complaint-in-intervention without prejudice. On April 17, 2020, the Court continued the hearing on the motion to be relieved as counsel to August 5, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Aug 05, 2020

JAVIER SALGADO, ET AL. VS CASSY AND GEO'S CORP. , ET AL.

.: 19STCV25597 Hearing Date: August 4, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion for leave to intervene by WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY Proposed Intervenor Wesco Insurance Company (“Intervenor”) seeks leave to intervene in this action per Code of Civil Procedure section 387, which permits intervention in a pending action when the proposed intervenor has an interest in the matter that is the subject of the litigation, or in the success of any party. Code of Civil Procedure section 387, subd.

  • Hearing

    Aug 04, 2020

ANDREW J. ELIOPULOS, ET AL. VS MILGARD MANUFACTURING, ET AL.

RESPONDING PARTY: Intervenor Benchmark Insurance Company on behalf of Perez Plastering Design, Inc. and Perez Plastering, Inc. NOTICE: ok RELIEF REQUESTED: An order determining that the settlement reached between Plaintiffs Andrew J.

  • Hearing

    Aug 04, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

JG WENTWORTH ORIGINATIONS LLC VS DAVIS

Insurance Code § 10139.5 governs transfers of payments due to payees under structured settlements.

  • Hearing

    Aug 03, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

CHRIS NGUYEN VS SUPERIOR INTERMODAL SERVICES, INC., ET AL.

On June 4, 2020, Security National Insurance Company, administered by AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. filed a motion for leave to file a complaint-in-intervention pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 387. Trial is set for February 9, 2021. PARTY’S REQUEST Security National Insurance Company, administered by AmTrust Financial Services, Inc.

  • Hearing

    Aug 03, 2020

CARMEN R RODRIGUEZ, ET AL. VS HECTOR REYES TORRES

.: 18STCV07304 Hearing Date: July 31, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion for leave to intervene by INFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY Proposed Intervenor State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“Intervenor”) seeks leave to intervene in this action per Code of Civil Procedure section 387, which permits intervention in a pending action when the proposed intervenor has an interest in the matter that is the subject of the litigation, or in the success of any party. Code of Civil Procedure section 387, subd.

  • Hearing

    Jul 31, 2020

ASSET SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC VS ASSET SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC

Finally, the motion for leave to file petition in intervention filed on July 28, 2020 by Ladderstile Companies, LLC (“Ladderstile”) further militates against approval of the instant petition by Asset Security Funding.

  • Hearing

    Jul 31, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 311     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.