What is a Judgment Lien?

Useful Rulings on Judgment Lien

Recent Rulings on Judgment Lien

STARA ORIEN VS MISTA L LUTZ ET AL

On December 6, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike Notice of Lien against Chelese’s Nevada Judgment lien, which was also set for hearing on January 2, 2020. On January 2, 2020, while the Court decided on Defendants, Ms. Lutz and Mr. Howell’s Motions, the Court deferred ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Notice of Lien to “allow lien claimant, Conway, the opportunity to serve Plaintiff with notice of sister state judgment and related papers” and encouraged Chelese and Ms.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY VS YANIV A. KAHANER, ET AL.

Although the document was later decreed a forgery, Plaintiff was unable to renew the judgment lien. On June 17, 2019, Plaintiff filed it’s complaint for conversion, receiving of stolen property, unjust enrichment, fraudulent conveyance, and constructive trust. On January 14, 2020, the clerk entered a default against Defendants Rebeka Shadpour and Wealth Road, Inc. On January 21, 2020, Defendants Rebeka Shadpour and Wealth Road, Inc. filed an answer to the complaint.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

On April 4, 2020, Judgment Debtor filed the instant Motion to Request Full Satisfaction of Judgment and Release of Judgment Lien (“the Motion”). Judgment Creditor filed an opposition on September 18, 2020. The Motion initially came for hearing on October 13, 2020, at which time the Court heard oral argument and continued the matter. (Minute Order, 10/13/20.)

  • Hearing

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

GRABOWSKI VS. GRABOWSKI

(See June 14, 2012 Order Granting Motion for Re-Entry of Order for Satisfaction of Judgment Lien, Page 2, Lines 5-9.) Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

BOD. OF TRUSTEE OF CAL. IRONWORKERS PENSION VS. GARY HEATON

Alternatively, with respect to a few specific kinds of personal property, a judgment creditor can obtain a judgment lien by filing a notice of lien with the Secretary of State. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 697.510, subd. (a), 697.530, subd. (a).) Either type of lien has priority over an unperfected security interest. (Code Civ. Proc., § 697.590, subds. (b), (c) [judgment lien]; Cal. U. Com. Code, §§ 9102, subd. (a)(52), 9317, subd.

  • Hearing

XIYAN WU BOCK VS PHILLIP A. BUCK

Alternatively, with respect to a few specific kinds of personal property, a judgment creditor can obtain a judgment lien by filing a notice of lien with the Secretary of State. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 697.510, subd. (a), 697.530, subd. (a).) Either type of lien has priority over an unperfected security interest. (Code Civ. Proc., § 697.590, subds. (b), (c) [judgment lien]; Cal. U. Com. Code, §§ 9102, subd. (a)(52), 9317, subd.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Dissolution

LIONEL A. WYATT VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

That the Court issue a Stay of all attempts to collect, satisfy or perfect the disputed "judgment lien" also determined and designated as a "special direct assessment, and specifically against the respondent Los Angeles County Tax Collector, (collection agent on behalf of all other respondents) pending the decision of the Writ Petition. That the Stay Order be directed to each and every respondent herein. 6.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

AURA IGLESIAS VS RONALD KEITH ZIFF ET AL

Plaintiff’s counsel in the Family Law Action never filed a Judgment Lien (Form JL-1) with the Secretary of State. (USSF No. 5.) On September 6, 2013, Plaintiff submitted a written claim to BES, which attached copies of the 2009 Family Law Action judgment and the Notarized Agreement, and demanded payment of $225,493 from the escrow for the transaction initiated in August 2013 involving the sale of the Restaurant handled by BES as Escrow No. 39386 (the “First Escrow”). (USSF Nos. 15-16.)

  • Hearing

STRATEGIC FUNDING SOURCE, INC. VS SUNSET POOLS CUSTOM DESIGN, INC., ET AL.

Although the document was later decreed a forgery, Plaintiff was unable to renew the judgment lien. On June 17, 2019, Plaintiff filed its complaint for conversion, receiving of stolen property, unjust enrichment, fraudulent conveyance, and constructive trust. On January 14, 2020, the clerk entered a default against Defendants Rebeka Shadpour and Wealth Road, Inc. On January 21, 2020, Defendants Rebeka Shadpour and Wealth Road, Inc. filed an answer to the complaint.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

ALCOR LIFE EXTENSION FOUNDATION VS KARL E PILGERAM ET AL

Alcor – Release of Claims as against Karl Pilgeram: In return for the consideration provided herein, Alcor . . . hereby fully and forever releases Karl Pilgeram and his heirs (with the exception of Kurt Pilgeram) . . . from, and agrees not so sue concerning, any claim, duty, obligation, judgment, lien, indebtedness, damage, loss or cause of action relating to any matters of any kind (including attorneys’ fees and costs), whether presently known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, that it may possess arising

  • Hearing

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

MERCHANT CAPITAL SOURCE, LLC., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Evidence Code section 452, subdivisions (c) and (h), Defendant requests judicial notice of (1) a copy of the judgment lien recorded by the County Recorder’s office in Dallas, Texas and (2) a copy of the Corporate Records & Business Registration for Herrera Tex Mex Foods, Inc. (Am. Oppo., RJN, Exhs. 1, 2.)

  • Hearing

LORETTA LOTITO VS CARL LOTITO, ET AL.

Plaintiff requests a distribution of $947,524.90, calculated as follows: Sale price: $2,500,000.00 + Statement fee credit: $ 3,175.00 - Amount due on mortgage: $ 134,362.76 = $2,368,812.24 x Plaintiff’s 40% interest x 0.4 = $ 947,524.90 Apart from these amounts, the costs of partition assessed against Defendant Carl Lotito would total $196,701.75, representing $125,000 in brokers’ fees, $17,000 in court-appointed referee fees, title and escrow fees, and $15,000 for a judgment lien against Defendant.

  • Hearing

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

On April 4, 2020, Judgment Debtor filed the instant Motion to Request Full Satisfaction of Judgment and Release of Judgment Lien (“the Motion”). Judgment Creditor filed an opposition on September 18, 2020. Discussion Judgment Debtor moves for acknowledgement of full satisfaction of judgment on multiple grounds. First, that he transferred the property on which the association fees accrued prior to this action being filed. Second, that $11,459.95 has been paid towards the judgment and fees.

  • Hearing

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

MINAULT VS. PEMSTEIN

A judgment lien on real property based on a lump sum money judgment is created by recording an abstract of money judgment with the county recorder where the real property is located. (C.C.P. § 697.310(a).) Here, Plaintiff has recorded an Abstract of Judgment in connection with her money judgment. (ROA 98; see also, Gates Reply Decl., ¶ 4, Ex. A.) “A judgment for sale of real or personal property may be enforced by a writ of sale issued pursuant to Section 712.010.” (C.C.P. § 716.010(a).) 1.

  • Hearing

THE GREATS, LP VS CIT BANK, N.A.

Hartunian; and (4) one recorded judgment lien against Mr. Hartunian. Judicial notice is denied as to the purported Real Estate Loan Application submitted by Mr. Hartunian, as it constitutes a contract between private parties, for which there are no sources of reasonably indisputable accuracy to show the fact of this loan application existing between the parties. (See Gould v. Maryland Sound Industries, Inc. (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 1137, 1145, as modified (Feb. 9, 1995).

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

THE MORTGAGE LAW FIRM, PLC VS ALL CLAIMANTS TO SURPLUS PROCEEDS AFTER THE TRUSTEE'S SALE OF THE REAL PROPERTY

The outcome of the lawsuit could evidently result in the property being ordered conveyed to Kennedy, possibly with damages, or in a judgment for damages, which would then have to become a recorded judgment lien before it would ordinarily entitle the holder to surplus funds. The outcome of the lawsuit could also result in no award to Kennedy at all.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

HIT SONG PRODUCTIONS LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS LARRY WILCOX, ET AL.

Then on March 5,2020, a judgment lien was filed with the California Secretary of State. (Boris Decl., ¶5, Exh. D.) No part of the judgment has been paid. (Boris Decl.,¶6, Exh. D.) Plaintiff contends the unsatisfied portion of the Judgment as to Debtor entered in this action as of May 18,2020, is $412,706.44 ($401 ,701.44 plus interest of $11,005.00).

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

  • Judge

    Paul A. Bacigalupo or Virginia Keeny

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC V. STRICKLER

Vacating Judgment Lien Plaintiff argues that the judgment lien recorded on April 15, 2016 should not be vacated, because defendant has not identified any grounds to vacate the judgment entered over ten years ago. The underlying judgment being void, the recording of that judgment does not validate the judgment in any manner. The recorded judgment lien is also void for lack of personal jurisdiction and subject to being vacated at any time.

  • Hearing

ANDRANIK AVEDYAN VS ALIS AVEDYAN, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

Defendant argues that as a matter of law, a full reconveyance wipes out the party’s lien, and that as such, this Court must determine the proper order of liens on the property: (1) plaintiff and Auvazyan, as tenants in common, (2) Lender, and (3) the Alis Avedyan judgment lien. Defendant relies on In re Martin (2013 USBC E.D.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

PETITION OF CNA FORECLOSURE SERVICE INC

Barber to satisfy his June 8, 2015 judgment lien against the Property. See Cal. Civ. Code § 2924k(a)(3). Third, the court disburses $3,621.41 to Madrid Manor Inc. to satisfy its February 11, 2019 assessment lien against the Property. See Cal. Civ. Code § 2924k(a)(3). Finally, the court denies the Kellies and Mr. Stowell's respective requests. The Kellies provide no authority supporting the assertion that the court can use California Probate Code § 13100 et seq.'

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

HOLT VS. RUTHERFORD

To overrule the demurrer made by Defendant Rutherford as trustee to the Rutherford Family Trust to Cause of Action 2 for Judicial Foreclosure of Judgment Lien. It is not the function of the demurrer to challenge the truthfulness of the complaint; and for purpose of the ruling on the demurrer, all facts pleaded in the complaint are assumed to be true . . . however improbable they may be. See Ferrick v. Santa Clara University (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 1337, 1341.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

DIANA IRIARTE VS CHAD WEAVER ET AL

The judgment debtor or owner of real or personal property subject to a judgment lien created under a money judgment may serve (personally or by mail) a demand on the judgment creditor's attorney of record that the creditor execute and deliver an acknowledgment of partial satisfaction of the judgment. If the judgment has been partially satisfied, the creditor must comply with the demand within 15 days after actual receipt. (Code Civ. Proc. § 724.110, subd. (a).)

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

CAPITAL FINANCIAL CREDIT. LLC VS DAVID PULIDO

The judgment lien was created in 2008; the Abstract of Judgment was recorded on October 17, 2008. See, RJN 4.

  • Hearing

STARS AND BARS, LLC V WESTPORT CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC

Through this application, defendants are attempting to establish the priority of their judgment lien filed in this action. The issuance of an injunction is not authorized by the comprehensive Enforcement of Judgments Law. CCP §690.010, et seq. The priority of judgment liens is to be made on a noticed application to establish priority of the liens. This necessarily encompasses the question of the validity of OC West LLC’s judgment lien.

  • Hearing

JRSL FAM 1 LLC VS COVINA PALMS CENTER LLC ET AL

Over the past seven years, Creditor has recorded various liens such as “(1) recorded an abstract of judgment to create a lien on Debtor's real property, (2) filed a judgment lien with the California Secretary of State, (3) obtained an assignment order against certain third parties that may do business with Debtor, (4) obtained a charging order against Debtor's interest in a limited liability company, (5) foreclosed on Debtor's interest in real property and (6) filed liens in pending lawsuit(s) and bankruptcy

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.