Section 22440 et seq. of California Business and Professions Code governs nonlawyers who offer non-legal assistance in immigration matters in California. Under Business and Professions Code Sec. 22440 et seq., it is unlawful for any person, for compensation, other than persons authorized to practice law or authorized by federal law to represent persons before the Board of Immigration Appeals or the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, to engage in the business or act in the capacity of an immigration consultant within this state. To plead a cause of action under this statute, plaintiff must plead:
Bus & Prof. Code § 22446.5.
A person engages in the business or acts in the capacity of an immigration consultant when that person gives nonlegal assistance or advice on an immigration matter. Bus & Prof. Code § 22441(a). That assistance or advice includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(Id.)
Bus. & Prof. Code § 22446.5(b) states: “Any other party who, upon information and belief, claims a violation of this chapter has been committed by an immigration consultant may bring a civil action for injunctive relief on behalf of the general public and, upon prevailing, shall recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.”
“[A]s a matter of law the unclean hands doctrine is not an affirmative defense to an ICA cause of action.” Mendoza v. Ruesga (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 270, 282.
“Application of the doctrine would allow unscrupulous immigration consultants to go unpunished and undermine the protective purposes of the legislation.” Id.
“The dishonesty of undocumented immigrants cannot be countenanced, of course, but the Legislature was undoubtedly aware of that potential when it enacted the ICA and subsequent amendments.” Id. citing Sen. Com. on Judiciary, Analysis of Assem. Bill No. 2520 (1993-1994 Reg. Sess.) at 3-4 ("Victims include undocumented immigrants who are poor, have little knowledge of the United States' legal system, and who are desperate to gain work authorization, amnesty, or other protection from deportation"). “Yet, while consistently expanding protections for immigrants, the Legislature has imposed no obligations on them or limitations on their recovery.” Id.
“Again, the ICA is principally intended to curb fraud, a cause of action that existed at common law.” Mendoza v. Ruesga (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th at 287. “Further, conduct by an immigration consultant giving rise to relief under the ICA may also give rise to punitive damages for breach of fiduciary duty or intentional infliction of emotional distress.” Id. “Although the ICA allows the recovery of compensatory damages, it does not provide for punitive damages.” Id.
Dec 03, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Nov 20, 2020
Placer County, CA
Oct 27, 2020
Placer County, CA
Oct 26, 2020
Fresno County, CA
Oct 14, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Oct 07, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Oct 05, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Oct 05, 2020
Placer County, CA
Sep 28, 2020
Placer County, CA
Sep 28, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Sep 25, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Aug 27, 2020
Tharpe, D Tyler
Fresno County, CA
Aug 26, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Aug 24, 2020
Placer County, CA
Aug 21, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Aug 14, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Aug 14, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Aug 12, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Aug 12, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Aug 12, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Aug 11, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Aug 10, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Aug 10, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Aug 10, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Aug 10, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Please wait a moment while we load this page.