“Under the Probate Code conservatorship proceedings the court ‘shall appoint a conservator of the person and property or person or property of any adult person who, in the case of a conservatorship of the person, is unable properly to provide for his personal needs for physical health, food, clothing or shelter, and, in the case of a conservatorship of the property, is substantially unable to manage his own financial resources, or resist fraud or undue influence....’” (Conservatorship of Sanderson (1980) 106 Cal. App. 3d 613, 618 citing Prob. Code Sec. 1751.)
“A probate conservator cannot place a conservatee in a mental health facility against his will.” (Conservatorship of Sanderson (1980) 106 Cal. App. 3d 613, 618 citing Prob. Code Sec. 1851.) “However, a probate conservator ‘has the care, custody and control of the conservatee and may fix the residence and domicile of the conservatee at any place within this state, but not elsewhere without the permission of the court.’” (Id.) “As mentioned earlier a probate conservator has the same powers as an LPS conservator, other than the power to place the conservatee in a mental health facility.” Id. “Respondent contends that a probate conservatee does not suffer the same deprivation of liberty as an LPS conservatee.” Id.
Under Probate Code 1470(a) the court may appoint the deputy public defender to represent the interests of the proposed temporary conservatee as a discretionary appointment.
The law requires full bond to the extent of all personal property assets, plus annual gross income, as well as a recovery bond. Probate Code Sec. 2620; CRC 7.207. If independent powers to buy sell or encumber real property are requested, the bond is further increased by all existing equity. Probate Code Sec. 2620.1; CRC 7.204.
Counsel for a conservatee in a probate conservatorship has full authority to bind the client with respect to jury trial. (Conservatorship of B.C. (2017) 6 Cal.App.5th 1028, 1035.)
Prob. Code Sec. 1800.3 states in relevant part: “No conservatorship of the person or the estate shall be granted by the court unless the court makes an express finding that the granting of the conservatorship is the least restrictive alternative needed for the protection of the conservatee.”
With regard to the sufficiency of evidence to support an order of probate conservatorship, the standard of review is a question of law. (Coastal Envtl. Rights Found. v. Cal. Reg'l Water Quality Control Bd. (2017) 12 Cal. App. 5th 178, 188.) Further, such a question is reviewed de novo. (Id.)
“Section 2645 provides in part:
(Conservatorship of Bryant (1996)45 Cal. App. 4th 119, 120.)
Size of the conservatorship estate is an important consideration in awarding attorney fees. (Conservatorship of Levitt (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 944.)
In contested conservatorships, where one party petitions for the appointment of one individual as conservator and another party objects and responds with a petition for the appointment of someone else, the losing party may petition the court for an order fixing and allowing fees and costs, provided the court determines that the petition was filed in the conservatee’s best interests. (Probate Code Sec. 2640.1(a).)
A petition for fees under Probate Code section 2604.1 cannot be filed “before the expiration of 90 days from the issuance of letters.” (Probate Code Sec. 2640.1(a).) In other words, a conservatorship must be established before a court may issue an order setting fees. (See Probate Code Sec. 2310 stating: appointment not effective until letters are issued.)
“Any compensation and costs allowed shall be charged to the estate of the conservatee. If a conservator of the estate is not appointed, but a conservator of the person is appointed, the compensation and costs allowed shall be ordered by the court to be paid from property belonging to the conservatee, whether held outright, in trust, or otherwise.” (Probate Code Sec. 2640.1(c).)
Although section 2640.1 contemplates payment from sources other than the conservatorship estate, it nonetheless still requires establishment of a conservatorship. (Id.)
A probate court may find that a general conservatorship is more appropriate and appoint a general conservator without an amended petition, when the only petition filed with the court requests a limited conservatorship. (Prob.
Jun 25, 2019
Santa Barbara County, CA
It appears the court needs further discussion with the proposed general conservator, with the assistance of conservatee's appointed counsel, which may just be a failure of recognition of the procedural protocol and notice requirements." Discussion was held on August 30, 2016 with conservatee's sister, again confirming the sister's intent to file a general conservatorship petition. As of October 24, 2016, at 1410 hrs., the requested general conservatorship petition has still not been filed.
Oct 25, 2016
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
There is no alleged emergency requiring a temporary conservator pending Octavio's general conservatorship petition set for November 15, 2016. The court's inclination is to maintain the status quo until the general conservatorship hearing and allow some communication from the conservator. gmr
Sep 27, 2016
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
There is no alleged emergency requiring a temporary conservator pending Octavio's general conservatorship petition set for November 15, 2016. The court's inclination is to maintain the status quo until the general conservatorship hearing and allow some communication from the conservator. gmr
Sep 27, 2016
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Opposition to the general conservatorship petition was filed by Barbara Agcaoli on August 7 17, 2016, proposed conservatee's former caregiver who identifies herself as a "friend". Ms. Agcaoli's opposition, inter alia, proposes the appointment of conservatee's nephew, Florida resident John Freed, as conservator. Neither Ms. Agcaoli nor Mr. Freed have filed a cross-petition seeking such appointment.
Sep 27, 2016
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Opposition to the general conservatorship petition was filed by Barbara Agcaoli on August 7 17, 2016, proposed conservatee's former caregiver who identifies herself as a "friend". Ms. Agcaoli's opposition, inter alia, proposes the appointment of conservatee's nephew, Florida resident John Freed, as conservator. Neither Ms. Agcaoli nor Mr. Freed have filed a cross-petition seeking such appointment.
Sep 27, 2016
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Opposition to the general conservatorship petition was filed by Barbara Agcaoli on August 7 17, 2016, proposed conservatee's former caregiver who identifies herself as a "friend". Ms. Agcaoli's opposition, inter alia, proposes the appointment of conservatee's nephew, Florida resident John Freed, as conservator. Neither Ms. Agcaoli nor Mr. Freed have filed a cross-petition seeking such appointment.
Sep 27, 2016
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Temporary conservator to be compensated through temporary conservatee's trust estate through prior court approval. Temporary powers will extend until the general conservatorship hearing set on August 29, 2017, 9:00 AM, J6. The capacity declaration from Dr. Hatch contains a dementia attachment, but neither the temporary nor general conservatorship petition contains such an attachment requesting dementia authority.
Jun 27, 2017
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The temporary conservatorship shall expire on December 22, 2015, the date the court intends to calendar for hearing on the general conservatorship. Set general conservatorship hearing for December 22, 2015, 9:00 AM, J6. gmr
Nov 10, 2015
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The temporary conservatorship shall expire on December 22, 2015, the date the court intends to calendar for hearing on the general conservatorship. Set general conservatorship hearing for December 22, 2015, 9:00 AM, J6. gmr
Nov 10, 2015
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The temporary conservatorship shall expire on December 22, 2015, the date the court intends to calendar for hearing on the general conservatorship. Set general conservatorship hearing for December 22, 2015, 9:00 AM, J6. gmr
Nov 10, 2015
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Appoint Ernestine Tabata, temporary conservator over the person of her son, Michael Tabata, until 3/20/12. "Mother" is not a valid reason to waive bond, and the Court will only appoint Ms. Tabata as conservator over the estate upon posting $70,000 bond. The general conservatorship hearing is set for 3/20/12, and the temporary conservator will need to file a physician's capacity declaration (GC-335) before her requested general conservatorship over the person of may be granted. (Prob.C. §1890 (c).) gmr
Feb 14, 2012
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
In light of the requirement under the Probate Code §1825 that the proposed conservatee appear at the general conservatorship hearing (with exceptions not applicable here), counsel for the conservator asserted that Ms. Stroud's failure to appear at the time of her jury trial should effectively be deemed a waiver of jury trial.
Mar 16, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
In light of the requirement under the Probate Code §1825 that the proposed conservatee appear at the general conservatorship hearing (with exceptions not applicable here), counsel for the conservator asserted that Ms. Stroud's failure to appear at the time of her jury trial should effectively be deemed a waiver of jury trial.
Mar 16, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
In light of the requirement under the Probate Code §1825 that the proposed conservatee appear at the general conservatorship hearing (with exceptions not applicable here), counsel for the conservator asserted that Ms. Stroud's failure to appear at the time of her jury trial should effectively be deemed a waiver of jury trial.
Mar 16, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
In light of the requirement under the Probate Code §1825 that the proposed conservatee appear at the general conservatorship hearing (with exceptions not applicable here), counsel for the conservator asserted that Ms. Stroud's failure to appear at the time of her jury trial should effectively be deemed a waiver of jury trial.
Mar 16, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
In light of the requirement under the Probate Code §1825 that the proposed conservatee appear at the general conservatorship hearing (with exceptions not applicable here), counsel for the conservator asserted that Ms. Stroud's failure to appear at the time of her jury trial should effectively be deemed a waiver of jury trial.
Mar 16, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
This general conservatorship was opened on April 8, 2008. It does not appear, however, that letters of general conservatorship ever issued; nor does it appear that conservator's attorney Wachbrit-Braverman ever followed up to secure those general letters before she substituted out of the case in 2009. No status report was ever filed by the conservator until this court issued an order requiring its filing on September 15, 2015.
Oct 27, 2015
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
In light of the requirement under the Probate Code §1825 that the proposed conservatee appear at the general conservatorship hearing (with exceptions not applicable here), counsel for the conservator asserted that Ms. Stroud's failure to appear at the time of her jury trial should effectively be deemed a waiver of jury trial.
Mar 16, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
In light of the requirement under the Probate Code §1825 that the proposed conservatee appear at the general conservatorship hearing (with exceptions not applicable here), counsel for the conservator asserted that Ms. Stroud's failure to appear at the time of her jury trial should effectively be deemed a waiver of jury trial.
Mar 16, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
In light of the requirement under the Probate Code §1825 that the proposed conservatee appear at the general conservatorship hearing (with exceptions not applicable here), counsel for the conservator asserted that Ms. Stroud's failure to appear at the time of her jury trial should effectively be deemed a waiver of jury trial.
Mar 16, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
In light of the requirement under the Probate Code §1825 that the proposed conservatee appear at the general conservatorship hearing (with exceptions not applicable here), counsel for the conservator asserted that Ms. Stroud's failure to appear at the time of her jury trial should effectively be deemed a waiver of jury trial.
Mar 16, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
In light of the requirement under the Probate Code §1825 that the proposed conservatee appear at the general conservatorship hearing (with exceptions not applicable here), counsel for the conservator asserted that Ms. Stroud's failure to appear at the time of her jury trial should effectively be deemed a waiver of jury trial.
Mar 16, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
In light of the requirement under the Probate Code §1825 that the proposed conservatee appear at the general conservatorship hearing (with exceptions not applicable here), counsel for the conservator asserted that Ms. Stroud's failure to appear at the time of her jury trial should effectively be deemed a waiver of jury trial.
Mar 16, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Upon the court's review of the instant general conservatorship application, including the capacity declaration, this appears to be an appropriate case for general conservatorship, in which case the regional center's statutory assessment is discretionary only. (Prob.C.§1827.5(b).) Assuming the proposed conservator and conservatee are present in court, and proposed conservatee's counsel concurs, the court grants the petition.
Feb 07, 2017
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Please wait a moment while we load this page.