“Under the Probate Code conservatorship proceedings the court ‘shall appoint a conservator of the person and property or person or property of any adult person who, in the case of a conservatorship of the person, is unable properly to provide for his personal needs for physical health, food, clothing or shelter, and, in the case of a conservatorship of the property, is substantially unable to manage his own financial resources, or resist fraud or undue influence....’” (Conservatorship of Sanderson (1980) 106 Cal. App. 3d 613, 618 citing Prob. Code Sec. 1751.)
“A probate conservator cannot place a conservatee in a mental health facility against his will.” (Conservatorship of Sanderson (1980) 106 Cal. App. 3d 613, 618 citing Prob. Code Sec. 1851.) “However, a probate conservator ‘has the care, custody and control of the conservatee and may fix the residence and domicile of the conservatee at any place within this state, but not elsewhere without the permission of the court.’” (Id.) “As mentioned earlier a probate conservator has the same powers as an LPS conservator, other than the power to place the conservatee in a mental health facility.” Id. “Respondent contends that a probate conservatee does not suffer the same deprivation of liberty as an LPS conservatee.” Id.
Under Probate Code 1470(a) the court may appoint the deputy public defender to represent the interests of the proposed temporary conservatee as a discretionary appointment.
The law requires full bond to the extent of all personal property assets, plus annual gross income, as well as a recovery bond. Probate Code Sec. 2620; CRC 7.207. If independent powers to buy sell or encumber real property are requested, the bond is further increased by all existing equity. Probate Code Sec. 2620.1; CRC 7.204.
Counsel for a conservatee in a probate conservatorship has full authority to bind the client with respect to jury trial. (Conservatorship of B.C. (2017) 6 Cal.App.5th 1028, 1035.)
Prob. Code Sec. 1800.3 states in relevant part: “No conservatorship of the person or the estate shall be granted by the court unless the court makes an express finding that the granting of the conservatorship is the least restrictive alternative needed for the protection of the conservatee.”
With regard to the sufficiency of evidence to support an order of probate conservatorship, the standard of review is a question of law. (Coastal Envtl. Rights Found. v. Cal. Reg'l Water Quality Control Bd. (2017) 12 Cal. App. 5th 178, 188.) Further, such a question is reviewed de novo. (Id.)
“Section 2645 provides in part:
(Conservatorship of Bryant (1996)45 Cal. App. 4th 119, 120.)
Size of the conservatorship estate is an important consideration in awarding attorney fees. (Conservatorship of Levitt (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 944.)
In contested conservatorships, where one party petitions for the appointment of one individual as conservator and another party objects and responds with a petition for the appointment of someone else, the losing party may petition the court for an order fixing and allowing fees and costs, provided the court determines that the petition was filed in the conservatee’s best interests. (Probate Code Sec. 2640.1(a).)
A petition for fees under Probate Code section 2604.1 cannot be filed “before the expiration of 90 days from the issuance of letters.” (Probate Code Sec. 2640.1(a).) In other words, a conservatorship must be established before a court may issue an order setting fees. (See Probate Code Sec. 2310 stating: appointment not effective until letters are issued.)
“Any compensation and costs allowed shall be charged to the estate of the conservatee. If a conservator of the estate is not appointed, but a conservator of the person is appointed, the compensation and costs allowed shall be ordered by the court to be paid from property belonging to the conservatee, whether held outright, in trust, or otherwise.” (Probate Code Sec. 2640.1(c).)
Although section 2640.1 contemplates payment from sources other than the conservatorship estate, it nonetheless still requires establishment of a conservatorship. (Id.)
This appears to be better suited for a limited conservatorship of the person rather than a general conservatorship of the person. The Court intends to discuss the possibility of a limited conservatorship and continue for a report from Tri-Counties. In addition, the Court will take testimony from Petitioners regarding their attempts to locate Laura Aldaco to determine if an Order Dispensing with Notice is appropriate under the circumstances.
Jun 01, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The court appoints Sandra Harris, limited conservator of the person of her daughter, Marie Syzmanski. Consistent with the recommendation of Dr. Ashley at the regional center, the court authorizes all seven statutory limited powers. The general conservatorship previously in place is terminated. A new order establishing limited conservatorship should be submitted, and the appropriate letters of limited conservatorship should issue.
May 18, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Upon the consent of proposed conservatee's counsel, grant petition as a general conservatorship. Appoint Lois Englehardt, conservator of the person and estate of her son, Matthew Englehart. Bond is §2323 and waived. Set hearings on 60-day care plan, inventory/appraisal in anticipation of Probate Code §2628 accounting waiver, and one-year status report. gmr
May 18, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Upon the consent of proposed conservatee's counsel, grant petition as a general conservatorship. Appoint Lois Englehardt, conservator of the person and estate of her son, Matthew Englehart. Bond is §2323 and waived. Set hearings on 60-day care plan, inventory/appraisal in anticipation of Probate Code §2628 accounting waiver, and one-year status report. gmr
May 18, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship hearing is continued to May 25, 2018, 9:00 AM, J6. gmr
May 11, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship hearing is set for June 15, 2018. A §2250.6 investigation report has not been completed. The temporary conservatorship petition suggests that proposed placement, finance and social relationship limited powers are worthy of analysis on a temporary basis. Discuss. gmr
May 11, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship hearing is continued to May 25, 2018, 9:00 AM, J6. gmr
May 11, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship hearing is set for June 15, 2018. A §2250.6 investigation report has not been completed. The temporary conservatorship petition suggests that proposed placement, finance and social relationship limited powers are worthy of analysis on a temporary basis. Discuss. gmr
May 11, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
A temporary conservatorship of the person and estate was established on April 20, 2018, on $687,000 bond, rather than upon the requested general conservatorship, in light of proposed conservatee's reluctance to be examined for purposes of the court receiving a GC-335 capacity declaration. Upon receipt of a confirming capacity declaration, and upon the consent of proposed conservatee's counsel, grant general conservatorship petition.
May 11, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
A temporary conservatorship of the person and estate was established on April 20, 2018, on $687,000 bond, rather than upon the requested general conservatorship, in light of proposed conservatee's reluctance to be examined for purposes of the court receiving a GC-335 capacity declaration. Upon receipt of a confirming capacity declaration, and upon the consent of proposed conservatee's counsel, grant general conservatorship petition.
May 11, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship hearing is continued to May 25, 2018, 9:00 AM, J6. gmr
May 11, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship hearing is continued to May 25, 2018, 9:00 AM, J6. gmr
May 11, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship hearing is continued to May 25, 2018, 9:00 AM, J6. gmr
May 11, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
A temporary conservatorship of the person and estate was established on April 20, 2018, on $687,000 bond, rather than upon the requested general conservatorship, in light of proposed conservatee's reluctance to be examined for purposes of the court receiving a GC-335 capacity declaration. Upon receipt of a confirming capacity declaration, and upon the consent of proposed conservatee's counsel, grant general conservatorship petition.
May 11, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
A temporary conservatorship of the person and estate was established on April 20, 2018, on $687,000 bond, rather than upon the requested general conservatorship, in light of proposed conservatee's reluctance to be examined for purposes of the court receiving a GC-335 capacity declaration. Upon receipt of a confirming capacity declaration, and upon the consent of proposed conservatee's counsel, grant general conservatorship petition.
May 11, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
A temporary conservatorship of the person and estate was established on April 20, 2018, on $687,000 bond, rather than upon the requested general conservatorship, in light of proposed conservatee's reluctance to be examined for purposes of the court receiving a GC-335 capacity declaration. Upon receipt of a confirming capacity declaration, and upon the consent of proposed conservatee's counsel, grant general conservatorship petition.
May 11, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
A temporary conservatorship of the person and estate was established on April 20, 2018, on $687,000 bond, rather than upon the requested general conservatorship, in light of proposed conservatee's reluctance to be examined for purposes of the court receiving a GC-335 capacity declaration. Upon receipt of a confirming capacity declaration, and upon the consent of proposed conservatee's counsel, grant general conservatorship petition.
May 11, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship hearing is continued to May 25, 2018, 9:00 AM, J6. gmr
May 11, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
General conservatorship on additional bond of $151,493.05 was established on April 28, 2015. The final inventory/appraisal identified a $499,000 single family residence in Simi Valley plus $197,721.65 in securities. Co-conservators first account, due by June 15, 2016, was continued numerous times over many months at co-conservators' request, until a document purporting to be an account was filed on May 26, 2017.
May 08, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
General conservatorship on additional bond of $151,493.05 was established on April 28, 2015. The final inventory/appraisal identified a $499,000 single family residence in Simi Valley plus $197,721.65 in securities. Co-conservators first account, due by June 15, 2016, was continued numerous times over many months at co-conservators' request, until a document purporting to be an account was filed on May 26, 2017.
May 08, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
General conservatorship on additional bond of $151,493.05 was established on April 28, 2015. The final inventory/appraisal identified a $499,000 single family residence in Simi Valley plus $197,721.65 in securities. Co-conservators first account, due by June 15, 2016, was continued numerous times over many months at co-conservators' request, until a document purporting to be an account was filed on May 26, 2017.
May 08, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
With respect to Cynthia, petitioners are seeking a general conservatorship. As to Nicholas and Thomas, petitioners are requesting a limited conservatorship. However, the court has also received a Probate Code §1827.5 statutory assessment with respect to Cynthia. Upon the consent of proposed conservatee's counsel, grant petition. Appoint Edward Romero and Rosalind Romero, co-conservators of the person of their daughter, Cynthia Romero.
May 04, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Macias, the conservator, died on March 23, 2018. By ex parte application, Mr. Macias' wife, Linda Macias, seeks temporary conservatorship over her sister-in-law, Claire Cline, on $300,000 bond, pending general conservatorship hearing currently set for June 29, 2018. Upon consent of conservatee's counsel, the court appoints Linda Macias, temporary conservator of the person and estate of her sister-in-law, Claire Cline. Bond is $300,000. gmr
May 04, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Macias, the conservator, died on March 23, 2018. By ex parte application, Mr. Macias' wife, Linda Macias, seeks temporary conservatorship over her sister-in-law, Claire Cline, on $300,000 bond, pending general conservatorship hearing currently set for June 29, 2018. Upon consent of conservatee's counsel, the court appoints Linda Macias, temporary conservator of the person and estate of her sister-in-law, Claire Cline. Bond is $300,000. gmr
May 04, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
With respect to Cynthia, petitioners are seeking a general conservatorship. As to Nicholas and Thomas, petitioners are requesting a limited conservatorship. However, the court has also received a Probate Code §1827.5 statutory assessment with respect to Cynthia. Upon the consent of proposed conservatee's counsel, grant petition. Appoint Edward Romero and Rosalind Romero, co-conservators of the person of their daughter, Cynthia Romero.
May 04, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Please wait a moment while we load this page.