“Under the Probate Code conservatorship proceedings the court ‘shall appoint a conservator of the person and property or person or property of any adult person who, in the case of a conservatorship of the person, is unable properly to provide for his personal needs for physical health, food, clothing or shelter, and, in the case of a conservatorship of the property, is substantially unable to manage his own financial resources, or resist fraud or undue influence....’” (Conservatorship of Sanderson (1980) 106 Cal. App. 3d 613, 618 citing Prob. Code Sec. 1751.)
“A probate conservator cannot place a conservatee in a mental health facility against his will.” (Conservatorship of Sanderson (1980) 106 Cal. App. 3d 613, 618 citing Prob. Code Sec. 1851.) “However, a probate conservator ‘has the care, custody and control of the conservatee and may fix the residence and domicile of the conservatee at any place within this state, but not elsewhere without the permission of the court.’” (Id.) “As mentioned earlier a probate conservator has the same powers as an LPS conservator, other than the power to place the conservatee in a mental health facility.” Id. “Respondent contends that a probate conservatee does not suffer the same deprivation of liberty as an LPS conservatee.” Id.
Under Probate Code 1470(a) the court may appoint the deputy public defender to represent the interests of the proposed temporary conservatee as a discretionary appointment.
The law requires full bond to the extent of all personal property assets, plus annual gross income, as well as a recovery bond. Probate Code Sec. 2620; CRC 7.207. If independent powers to buy sell or encumber real property are requested, the bond is further increased by all existing equity. Probate Code Sec. 2620.1; CRC 7.204.
Counsel for a conservatee in a probate conservatorship has full authority to bind the client with respect to jury trial. (Conservatorship of B.C. (2017) 6 Cal.App.5th 1028, 1035.)
Prob. Code Sec. 1800.3 states in relevant part: “No conservatorship of the person or the estate shall be granted by the court unless the court makes an express finding that the granting of the conservatorship is the least restrictive alternative needed for the protection of the conservatee.”
With regard to the sufficiency of evidence to support an order of probate conservatorship, the standard of review is a question of law. (Coastal Envtl. Rights Found. v. Cal. Reg'l Water Quality Control Bd. (2017) 12 Cal. App. 5th 178, 188.) Further, such a question is reviewed de novo. (Id.)
“Section 2645 provides in part:
(Conservatorship of Bryant (1996)45 Cal. App. 4th 119, 120.)
Size of the conservatorship estate is an important consideration in awarding attorney fees. (Conservatorship of Levitt (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 944.)
In contested conservatorships, where one party petitions for the appointment of one individual as conservator and another party objects and responds with a petition for the appointment of someone else, the losing party may petition the court for an order fixing and allowing fees and costs, provided the court determines that the petition was filed in the conservatee’s best interests. (Probate Code Sec. 2640.1(a).)
A petition for fees under Probate Code section 2604.1 cannot be filed “before the expiration of 90 days from the issuance of letters.” (Probate Code Sec. 2640.1(a).) In other words, a conservatorship must be established before a court may issue an order setting fees. (See Probate Code Sec. 2310 stating: appointment not effective until letters are issued.)
“Any compensation and costs allowed shall be charged to the estate of the conservatee. If a conservator of the estate is not appointed, but a conservator of the person is appointed, the compensation and costs allowed shall be ordered by the court to be paid from property belonging to the conservatee, whether held outright, in trust, or otherwise.” (Probate Code Sec. 2640.1(c).)
Although section 2640.1 contemplates payment from sources other than the conservatorship estate, it nonetheless still requires establishment of a conservatorship. (Id.)
Petitioner son requests temporary conservatorship over the person and estate of his father, through a professional fiduciary, pending the general conservatorship hearing currently set for July 20, 2018. There is no capacity declaration on file as of June 27, 2018, at 1600 hrs. Likewise, there is no GC-020 as yet on file providing notice to the relatives, nor any indication the proposed conservatee has received notice.
Jun 29, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship hearing is continued to August 3, 2018, 9:00 AM, J6, at the request of the court investigator, as a result of the conservator's jury duty. gmr
Jun 29, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
General conservatorship of the person was granted on October 28, 2008. As of May 21, 2009, conservatee moved to a rehabilitation center at 6700 Sepulveda Boulevard, Van Nuys, California. As of the most recent investigative report filed May 14, 2017, conservatee remains at that facility. There has been no suggestion over the last nine years that conservatee's residence will ever be returned to Ventura County. Venue in this matter is transferred to the County of Los Angeles.(Prob.C.§ 2201(a).)
Jun 29, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Petitioner son requests temporary conservatorship over the person and estate of his father, through a professional fiduciary, pending the general conservatorship hearing currently set for July 20, 2018. There is no capacity declaration on file as of June 27, 2018, at 1600 hrs. Likewise, there is no GC-020 as yet on file providing notice to the relatives, nor any indication the proposed conservatee has received notice.
Jun 29, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Upon the recommendation and consent of conservatee's counsel, restructure the general conservatorship as a limited conservatorship. Dr. Brandt at the regional center recommends four of the seven statutory powers, and as to the remainder renders no opinion. The power to determine education/training should be added to the list of approved limited powers. The court would like to hear Mr.
Jun 22, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The Public Guardian is directed to immediately contact Saticoy Lemon to determine if the retirement assets have been withdrawn by the temporary conservator, and to advise of the general conservatorship managed exclusively by the Public Guardian. If the election has not already been inadvisedly made, the Public Guardian is directed to make the retirement election itself consistent with conservatee's best interests. Unfortunately there is no expiration date on the order for temporary conservatorship.
Jun 22, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Based upon what has been presented, this court cannot in good conscience find that a general conservatorship is the least restrictive alternative needed for the protection of the proposed conservatee (Prob.C.§1800.3(b).) The petition for general conservatorship is denied. gmr
Jun 22, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The Public Guardian is directed to immediately contact Saticoy Lemon to determine if the retirement assets have been withdrawn by the temporary conservator, and to advise of the general conservatorship managed exclusively by the Public Guardian. If the election has not already been inadvisedly made, the Public Guardian is directed to make the retirement election itself consistent with conservatee's best interests. Unfortunately there is no expiration date on the order for temporary conservatorship.
Jun 22, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Based upon what has been presented, this court cannot in good conscience find that a general conservatorship is the least restrictive alternative needed for the protection of the proposed conservatee (Prob.C.§1800.3(b).) The petition for general conservatorship is denied. gmr
Jun 22, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Graff suggests that the proposed conservatee's difficulties in communicating outside his inner circle does not necessarily translate to lack of functionality sufficient to compel a general conservatorship. As an example, Dr. Graff recommends denial of statutory limited powers to determine social/sexual contacts and the right to marriage. Dr. Graff believes that there may be lesser restrictive alternatives than the statutory limited conservatorship powers of placement and access to confidential records.
Jun 22, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Graff suggests that the proposed conservatee's difficulties in communicating outside his inner circle does not necessarily translate to lack of functionality sufficient to compel a general conservatorship. As an example, Dr. Graff recommends denial of statutory limited powers to determine social/sexual contacts and the right to marriage. Dr. Graff believes that there may be lesser restrictive alternatives than the statutory limited conservatorship powers of placement and access to confidential records.
Jun 22, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The minute order noted that counsel was directed to meet and confer, and submit within five days a date certain for court trial on the general conservatorship. It does not appear from a review of the both electronic and paper record that such a submission was ever lodged or filed. Please provide time estimates and proposed dates for court trial on the general conservatorship. gmr
Jun 15, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The minute order noted that counsel was directed to meet and confer, and submit within five days a date certain for court trial on the general conservatorship. It does not appear from a review of the both electronic and paper record that such a submission was ever lodged or filed. Please provide time estimates and proposed dates for court trial on the general conservatorship. gmr
Jun 15, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The minute order noted that counsel was directed to meet and confer, and submit within five days a date certain for court trial on the general conservatorship. It does not appear from a review of the both electronic and paper record that such a submission was ever lodged or filed. Please provide time estimates and proposed dates for court trial on the general conservatorship. gmr
Jun 15, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The minute order noted that counsel was directed to meet and confer, and submit within five days a date certain for court trial on the general conservatorship. It does not appear from a review of the both electronic and paper record that such a submission was ever lodged or filed. Please provide time estimates and proposed dates for court trial on the general conservatorship. gmr
Jun 15, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The minute order noted that counsel was directed to meet and confer, and submit within five days a date certain for court trial on the general conservatorship. It does not appear from a review of the both electronic and paper record that such a submission was ever lodged or filed. Please provide time estimates and proposed dates for court trial on the general conservatorship. gmr
Jun 15, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The minute order noted that counsel was directed to meet and confer, and submit within five days a date certain for court trial on the general conservatorship. It does not appear from a review of the both electronic and paper record that such a submission was ever lodged or filed. Please provide time estimates and proposed dates for court trial on the general conservatorship. gmr
Jun 15, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The minute order noted that counsel was directed to meet and confer, and submit within five days a date certain for court trial on the general conservatorship. It does not appear from a review of the both electronic and paper record that such a submission was ever lodged or filed. Please provide time estimates and proposed dates for court trial on the general conservatorship. gmr
Jun 15, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The minute order noted that counsel was directed to meet and confer, and submit within five days a date certain for court trial on the general conservatorship. It does not appear from a review of the both electronic and paper record that such a submission was ever lodged or filed. Please provide time estimates and proposed dates for court trial on the general conservatorship. gmr
Jun 15, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Causal Document & Date Filed : Petition for Appointment of Probate Conservator, 04/18/2018 The court's probate investigation unit has asked that this matter be continued in order to complete required interviews and prepare their investigative report. Hearing on the general conservatorship is continued to July 6, 2018, 9:00 AM, J6. gmr
Jun 15, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship hearing is currently set for August 10, 2018. The GC-020 notice upon all relatives to the second degree provides only three days mailed notice. The statute requires five days. (Probate Code §2250(e). The court needs to appreciate more about this case and temporary conservatee's circumstance before the temporary conservatorship can be extended. gmr
Jun 15, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The minute order noted that counsel was directed to meet and confer, and submit within five days a date certain for court trial on the general conservatorship. It does not appear from a review of the both electronic and paper record that such a submission was ever lodged or filed. Please provide time estimates and proposed dates for court trial on the general conservatorship. gmr
Jun 15, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Causal Document & Date Filed : Petition for Appointment of Probate Conservator, 04/18/2018 The court's probate investigation unit has asked that this matter be continued in order to complete required interviews and prepare their investigative report. Hearing on the general conservatorship is continued to July 6, 2018, 9:00 AM, J6. gmr
Jun 15, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The minute order noted that counsel was directed to meet and confer, and submit within five days a date certain for court trial on the general conservatorship. It does not appear from a review of the both electronic and paper record that such a submission was ever lodged or filed. Please provide time estimates and proposed dates for court trial on the general conservatorship. gmr
Jun 15, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The minute order noted that counsel was directed to meet and confer, and submit within five days a date certain for court trial on the general conservatorship. It does not appear from a review of the both electronic and paper record that such a submission was ever lodged or filed. Please provide time estimates and proposed dates for court trial on the general conservatorship. gmr
Jun 15, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Please wait a moment while we load this page.