“Under the Probate Code conservatorship proceedings the court ‘shall appoint a conservator of the person and property or person or property of any adult person who, in the case of a conservatorship of the person, is unable properly to provide for his personal needs for physical health, food, clothing or shelter, and, in the case of a conservatorship of the property, is substantially unable to manage his own financial resources, or resist fraud or undue influence....’” (Conservatorship of Sanderson (1980) 106 Cal. App. 3d 613, 618 citing Prob. Code Sec. 1751.)
“A probate conservator cannot place a conservatee in a mental health facility against his will.” (Conservatorship of Sanderson (1980) 106 Cal. App. 3d 613, 618 citing Prob. Code Sec. 1851.) “However, a probate conservator ‘has the care, custody and control of the conservatee and may fix the residence and domicile of the conservatee at any place within this state, but not elsewhere without the permission of the court.’” (Id.) “As mentioned earlier a probate conservator has the same powers as an LPS conservator, other than the power to place the conservatee in a mental health facility.” Id. “Respondent contends that a probate conservatee does not suffer the same deprivation of liberty as an LPS conservatee.” Id.
Under Probate Code 1470(a) the court may appoint the deputy public defender to represent the interests of the proposed temporary conservatee as a discretionary appointment.
The law requires full bond to the extent of all personal property assets, plus annual gross income, as well as a recovery bond. Probate Code Sec. 2620; CRC 7.207. If independent powers to buy sell or encumber real property are requested, the bond is further increased by all existing equity. Probate Code Sec. 2620.1; CRC 7.204.
Counsel for a conservatee in a probate conservatorship has full authority to bind the client with respect to jury trial. (Conservatorship of B.C. (2017) 6 Cal.App.5th 1028, 1035.)
Prob. Code Sec. 1800.3 states in relevant part: “No conservatorship of the person or the estate shall be granted by the court unless the court makes an express finding that the granting of the conservatorship is the least restrictive alternative needed for the protection of the conservatee.”
With regard to the sufficiency of evidence to support an order of probate conservatorship, the standard of review is a question of law. (Coastal Envtl. Rights Found. v. Cal. Reg'l Water Quality Control Bd. (2017) 12 Cal. App. 5th 178, 188.) Further, such a question is reviewed de novo. (Id.)
“Section 2645 provides in part:
(Conservatorship of Bryant (1996)45 Cal. App. 4th 119, 120.)
Size of the conservatorship estate is an important consideration in awarding attorney fees. (Conservatorship of Levitt (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 944.)
In contested conservatorships, where one party petitions for the appointment of one individual as conservator and another party objects and responds with a petition for the appointment of someone else, the losing party may petition the court for an order fixing and allowing fees and costs, provided the court determines that the petition was filed in the conservatee’s best interests. (Probate Code Sec. 2640.1(a).)
A petition for fees under Probate Code section 2604.1 cannot be filed “before the expiration of 90 days from the issuance of letters.” (Probate Code Sec. 2640.1(a).) In other words, a conservatorship must be established before a court may issue an order setting fees. (See Probate Code Sec. 2310 stating: appointment not effective until letters are issued.)
“Any compensation and costs allowed shall be charged to the estate of the conservatee. If a conservator of the estate is not appointed, but a conservator of the person is appointed, the compensation and costs allowed shall be ordered by the court to be paid from property belonging to the conservatee, whether held outright, in trust, or otherwise.” (Probate Code Sec. 2640.1(c).)
Although section 2640.1 contemplates payment from sources other than the conservatorship estate, it nonetheless still requires establishment of a conservatorship. (Id.)
The general conservatorship of the estate was established by order of the undersigned on March 23, 2018, on $160,000 bond. Bond was posted in the sum of $160,000 on September 5, 2018. No appearance is required. The next previously scheduled hearing is on July 2, 2019 on the conservator's first account (to be filed on or before May 15, 2019.) gmr
Sep 18, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship of the estate was established by order of the undersigned on March 23, 2018, on $160,000 bond. Bond was posted in the sum of $160,000 on September 5, 2018. No appearance is required. The next previously scheduled hearing is on July 2, 2019 on the conservator's first account (to be filed on or before May 15, 2019.) gmr
Sep 18, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship of the estate was established by order of the undersigned on March 23, 2018, on $160,000 bond. Bond was posted in the sum of $160,000 on September 5, 2018. No appearance is required. The next previously scheduled hearing is on July 2, 2019 on the conservator's first account (to be filed on or before May 15, 2019.) gmr
Sep 18, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship of the estate was established by order of the undersigned on March 23, 2018, on $160,000 bond. Bond was posted in the sum of $160,000 on September 5, 2018. No appearance is required. The next previously scheduled hearing is on July 2, 2019 on the conservator's first account (to be filed on or before May 15, 2019.) gmr
Sep 18, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship hearing is set for October 26, 2018, 9:00 AM, J6. Other than petitioner's general concern for her grandmother's susceptibility to financial manipulation, there is not appear to be any specific exigency requiring action prior to the general conservatorship hearing.
Sep 14, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
If a limited or general conservatorship is established, is it the proposed conservator's plan to petition under §2580 for a substituted judgment special needs trust ? Discuss. gmr
Aug 31, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
If a limited or general conservatorship is established, is it the proposed conservator's plan to petition under §2580 for a substituted judgment special needs trust ? Discuss. gmr
Aug 31, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
If a limited or general conservatorship is established, is it the proposed conservator's plan to petition under §2580 for a substituted judgment special needs trust ? Discuss. gmr
Aug 31, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
If a limited or general conservatorship is established, is it the proposed conservator's plan to petition under §2580 for a substituted judgment special needs trust ? Discuss. gmr
Aug 31, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
If a limited or general conservatorship is established, is it the proposed conservator's plan to petition under §2580 for a substituted judgment special needs trust ? Discuss. gmr
Aug 31, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
If a limited or general conservatorship is established, is it the proposed conservator's plan to petition under §2580 for a substituted judgment special needs trust ? Discuss. gmr
Aug 31, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship of the estate was established by order of the undersigned on March 23, 2018, on $160,000 bond. It appears that the conservator was able to obtain letters of conservatorship without posting the required bond, in contravention of this court's order, jeopardizing the security of the estate and placing conservator's counsel unnecessarily at risk. (See Stine v. Dell'Osso (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 834.)
Aug 28, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship of the estate was established by order of the undersigned on March 23, 2018, on $160,000 bond. It appears that the conservator was able to obtain letters of conservatorship without posting the required bond, in contravention of this court's order, jeopardizing the security of the estate and placing conservator's counsel unnecessarily at risk. (See Stine v. Dell'Osso (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 834.)
Aug 28, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship of the estate was established by order of the undersigned on March 23, 2018, on $160,000 bond. It appears that the conservator was able to obtain letters of conservatorship without posting the required bond, in contravention of this court's order, jeopardizing the security of the estate and placing conservator's counsel unnecessarily at risk. (See Stine v. Dell'Osso (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 834.)
Aug 28, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The general conservatorship of the estate was established by order of the undersigned on March 23, 2018, on $160,000 bond. It appears that the conservator was able to obtain letters of conservatorship without posting the required bond, in contravention of this court's order, jeopardizing the security of the estate and placing conservator's counsel unnecessarily at risk. (See Stine v. Dell'Osso (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 834.)
Aug 28, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Appoint Michael Rosas, temporary conservator of the person and estate of his father, Edward Rosas. Discuss bond. The general conservatorship hearing has set for October 12, 2018, 9:00 AM, J6. gmr
Aug 17, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Appoint Michael Rosas, temporary conservator of the person and estate of his father, Edward Rosas. Discuss bond. The general conservatorship hearing has set for October 12, 2018, 9:00 AM, J6. gmr
Aug 17, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
While there is a notice of the temporary conservatorship petition, there does not appear to be GC-020 notice in the court file of the general conservatorship hearing. Upon the consent of proposed conservatee's counsel, and upon proper notice, grant petition. Appoint Pamela Kuske and Peggy Harwood, co-conservators of person of their mother, Maggie Masters. Discuss the requested dementia powers. Set hearings on 60-day care plan and one-year status report. gmr
Aug 10, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The application is for temporary conservatorship, not general conservatorship. The general conservatorship petition is set for September 28, 2018. Discuss. gmr
Aug 10, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
At some point, it appears that conservatee's father, Robert, became sole conservator. A review of third-party sources indicates that conservatee's mother, Teresa, died on February 18, 2015. All of the investigation reports in this case, including the initial report, suggest that this conservatorship should be administered as a statutory limited conservatorship, rather than a general conservatorship.
Aug 07, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Given the general conservatorship hearing date of September 28, 2018, such an appointment would require an interim reconsideration hearing under Probate Code 2250(f). The petition identifies only one other relative to the second degree, proposed conservatee's daughter in Virginia, Pages two and three of the GC-335 physician's capacity declaration does not appear in the court file.
Aug 03, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Causal Document & Date Filed : Petition for Appointment of Probate Conservator, 06/08/2018 The court appoints the deputy public defender to represent the interests of the proposed conservatee as a mandatory Probate Code §1471(c) appointment. Upon review of the statutory assessment report from Dr. Brandt at the regional center, this court concludes that this matter can only be advanced as a limited conservatorship (rather than general conservatorship) matter.
Aug 03, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Causal Document & Date Filed : Petition for Appointment of Probate Conservator, 06/08/2018 The court appoints the deputy public defender to represent the interests of the proposed conservatee as a mandatory Probate Code §1471(c) appointment. Upon review of the statutory assessment report from Dr. Brandt at the regional center, this court concludes that this matter can only be advanced as a limited conservatorship (rather than general conservatorship) matter.
Aug 03, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
By request filed August 1, 2016, petitioner has withdrawn her petition for temporary conservatorship of her husband, in favor of the general conservatorship petition currently set for September 21, 2018, 9:00 AM, J6. Temporary conservatorship petition off calendar. gmr
Aug 03, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
The hearing on general conservatorship of the person is continued, at the request of counsel, to August 3, 2018, 9:00 AM, J6, to accommodate a medical appointment for petitioner, presumably to obtain an updated GC-335. gmr
Jul 20, 2018
Family Law
Conservatorship
Ventura County, CA
Please wait a moment while we load this page.