Franchise Tax

Useful Resources for Franchise Tax

Recent Rulings on Franchise Tax

201-225 of 1781 results

MIRIAN ZELAYA VS LAS CHAMPAS, INC.

., who cannot defend itself while it is a suspended corporation for failure to pay taxes to the California Franchise Tax Board. Declaration of Kristine Minnick, ¶ 3. Reed v. Norman (1957) 48 Cal.2d 338, 343. Intervention is permitted to allow the insurer to protect its interests in the litigation. Western Heritage Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (2011) 199 Cal. App. 4th 1196, 1207-1208; Reliance Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (2000) 84 Cal. App. 4th 383, 385; Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v.

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2020

LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL.

Plaintiff discovered that Platinum had ceased employing class members near the end of 2015 and that its corporate charter had been suspended by the California Franchise Tax Board. On September 25, 2017, the Court granted class certification, and notice was subsequently distributed to the class. Plaintiff filed a Doe amendment naming Carchedi and Platinum Parking Mgmt, LLC as defendants and propounded additional discovery requests aimed at merits and liability issues for trial.

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2020

RE: AMENDED PET’N FOR FEES; REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS AND EXPENSES

Verified declaration by petitioner to show that notice of administration was given to the Franchise Tax Board. PrC § 9202(c)(1) 2. Compliance with CRC 7.250 regarding any acts taken under IAEA w/notice of proposed action. (Specifics needed or statement that no action was taken) 3. Verified declaration by petitioner to specify how attorney’s fees will be paid. There is no cash on hand. 4. Verified declaration by petitioner to specify whether all charges for legal advertising have been paid.

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP. VS. ALL CLAIMANTS STO SURPLUS FUN

Petitioner had identified two liens: (1) a deed of trust in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, upon which petitioner received a claim and all necessary supportive documents, and accordingly disbursed surplus funds to it in the amount of $269,735.91; and (2) a lien in favor of State of California Franchise Tax Board, for which petitioner received a waiver of claim. [Petition, Attach. 11b, Exs. B, C].

  • Hearing

    Feb 21, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

RE: OSC RE: NAME CHANGE

Proof of mailing Notice and Petition to Franchise Tax Board who requested special notice 6. Evidence of payment to Property Solutions and Investments for repairs. It appears sale of real property was confirmed by the Court 8-31-18. Petitioner may appear exparte to release funds as needed. 7. Verified declaration by petitioner to show calculation of statutory fee base as required by CRC § 7.705.

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF SHARON LYNN POWELL

Proof of mailing Notice and Petition to Franchise Tax Board who requested special notice 6. Evidence of payment to Property Solutions and Investments for repairs. It appears sale of real property was confirmed by the Court 8-31-18. Petitioner may appear exparte to release funds as needed. 7. Verified declaration by petitioner to show calculation of statutory fee base as required by CRC § 7.705.

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

SCOTT LAMBERT VS PATRICK GOLDBERG MCMAHON, ET AL.

In his declaration, Lambert declares that, on at least one occasion, he personally took a suitcase full of about $1 million in cash to the Franchise Tax Board. (Lambert Decl. ¶ 7.) He declares that when Defendants “took over the company, there was approximately $100,000 in cash in the company safe, and an additional $200,000 in the bank”. (Id. ¶ 8.) He declares that the $250,000 loan from Jeremy Green was made “personally” by Green to P&S, and that McMahon and others knew about this transaction.

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2020

CARLOS SANCHEZ VS TOBY LANDON CLAUDE

Franchise Tax Bd., 38 Cal.4th 897, 912 (2006) [citation omitted]. Documents filed with administrative agencies are not official acts of the agency. Even if they were, the court could not take judicial notice of facts asserted in the documents. “While we may take judicial notice of court records and official acts of state agencies (Evid. Code, § 452, subds. (c), (d)), the truth of matters asserted in such documents is not subject to judicial notice (Sosinsky v.

  • Hearing

    Feb 19, 2020

RE: OSC RE: NAME CHANGE

Franchise Tax Board Certificate was abolished as of January 2014. B. Statute does not require and court does not want bank statements JUANA LORA HARMON ROGER BEZDEK SUMMER C SELLECK SARA WETZSTEIN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE This matter will be heard in Dept. 15. Need: 1. Appearances to report status 2.

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF TAKRIT JIRAWUDOMCHAI, ET AL.

Franchise Tax Board Certificate was abolished as of January 2014. B. Statute does not require and court does not want bank statements JUANA LORA HARMON ROGER BEZDEK SUMMER C SELLECK SARA WETZSTEIN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances to report status 2.

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

THE MORTGAGE LAW FIRM, PLC VS ALL CLAIMANTS TO SURPLUS PROCEEDS AFTER THE TRUSTEE'S SALE OF THE REAL PROPERTY

A claim and amended claim from the State of California Franchise Tax Board, and a claim of Bill Frank Chandler, filed by Law Offices of Bennett A. Rheingold. ANALYSIS: Civil Code section 2924j specifies the procedure under which a trustee who is unable to determine the priority of claims to surplus in a trustee’s sale may deposit those proceeds with the court and permit the court to make the determination.

  • Hearing

    Feb 14, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

RE: FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF ADMINISTRATOR; AND PET’N FOR SETTLEMENT

Verified declaration by petitioner to show that notice of administration was given to the Franchise Tax Board. PrC § 9202(c)(1) 4. Compliance with CRC 7.250 regarding any acts taken under IAEA w/notice of proposed action. (Specifics needed or statement that no action was taken) 5. Verified declaration by petitioner to specify plan of distribution, including list of assets on hand for distribution and approximate amount of cash to be distributed to each heir. LR 7.301 6. Inventory and Appraisal filed 7.

  • Hearing

    Feb 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF ADMINISTRATOR; AND PET’N FOR SETTLEMENT

Verified declaration by petitioner to show that notice of administration was given to the Franchise Tax Board. PrC § 9202(c)(1) 4. Compliance with CRC 7.250 regarding any acts taken under IAEA w/notice of proposed action. (Specifics needed or statement that no action was taken) 5. Verified declaration by petitioner to specify plan of distribution, including list of assets on hand for distribution and approximate amount of cash to be distributed to each heir. LR 7.301 6. Inventory and Appraisal filed 7.

  • Hearing

    Feb 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF JOEL WAYNE ROBBINS

No such document was filed. 2) Notice to Franchise Tax Board. Notice MUST have been given to the Franchise Tax Board not later than 90 days after the date letters are first issued. (Prob. Code, § 9202, subd. (c)(1).) 3) Accounting or Waivers. The final account does not comply with Probate Code in the following ways: - Total Charges do not equal Total Credits. (Prob. Code, § 1061(c).) - The summary is not supported by detailed schedules. (Prob. Code, §1062.

  • Hearing

    Feb 10, 2020

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

KIMBERLY M JONES VS 1664 EVR LLC

The Certificate of Revivor issued by the Franchise Tax Board states: “This Limited Liability Company [1664 EVR, LLC] was relieved of suspension or forfeiture and is now in good standing with the Franchise Tax Board.” (Dfd. RJN, Ex. D.) On that same date, July 31, 2019, 1664 EVR was issued by the Franchise Tax Board a Certificate of Relief from Contract Voidability, which relieved the company from contract voidability from November 2, 2015 through July 31, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Feb 07, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

IN RE 130 NORTH MARTEL AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CA 90036

The State of California Franchise Tax Board filed a claim on September 21, 2018 (FTB claim). Claimants David and Leah Ross filed a claim on September 28, 2018 (Ross claim). Claimant Jason Rubin filed a claim on October 17, 2018 (Rubin claim).

  • Hearing

    Feb 07, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

LARRY RAY WILLIAMS VS CHASE AUTO FINANCE, ET AL.

Moving Party: Defendant Franchise Tax Board Defendant Comenity Bank Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.

  • Hearing

    Feb 07, 2020

MACK BROWN VS WESTERN PROGRESSIVE, ET AL.

tax, penalties, interest, and any other amounts due under this part, and upon the issuance by the Franchise Tax Board of a certificate or reviver. . . .”

  • Hearing

    Feb 06, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Foreclosure

IN THE MATTER OF MATTHEW GRANT STABEN

Petitioner Angelique Friend has filed a trust accounting for the Matthew G. Staben Irrevocable Trust in the probate case for the decedent Matthew G. Staben. The Court directs the trustee to file the trust accounting in the existing trust case where it belongs, Case No. 56-2015-00471544. It will then be considered....

  • Hearing

    Feb 05, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF WERNER ALFONS STALLER

Petitioner fails to allege that notice to the Franchise Tax Board was given. (Prob. C. § 9202(c).) If the notice was not given, the Court will continue for statutory notice. Otherwise, if Supplement filed confirming notice was given, a final account is waived. Approve statutory fees of $14,625 each to Petitioner and to her counsel. Approve $1,766.75 in costs reimbursement to Petitioner.

  • Hearing

    Feb 05, 2020

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

RE: APPL FOR ORDER TO PAY DEBTS & ADMINISTRATOR REIMBURSEMENT

File a verified declaration to show that notice of administration was given to the Franchise Tax Board. PrC § 9202(c)(1) 8. File a verified declaration to state when action under IAEA (with Notice of Proposed Action) was taken, when and to whom notice was given, whether notice was waived by anyone and whether any objections were received. CRC § 7.250 9. File a Summary of Account that complies with PrC § 1061(b). Summary must balance. 10.

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR AN ORDER TO DISTRIBUTE ADDITIONAL ESTATE ASSETS

Verified declaration by petitioner to show that notice of administration was given to the Franchise Tax Board. PrC § 9202(c)(1) 5. Accounting that complies with PrC § 1060 et seq. Accounting must begin with date of death values ($526,034.13), not Reappraisal for Sale. Need itemized list of expenses re: sale of real property. 6. Verified declaration of petitioner showing compliance with Probate Code § 11005 7.

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF JOSEPHINE FRANCES CARLENTINE

No such document was filed showing notice to Decedent’s son (Casey Carlentine). 2) Notice to Franchise Tax Board. Notice MUST have been given to the Franchise Tax Board not later than 90 days after the date letters are first issued. (Prob. Code, § 9202, subd. (c)(1).) The petition does not allege (at paragraph 7) that any notice was given to the Franchise Tax Board. 3) Notice to Relevant State Entities.

  • Hearing

    Feb 03, 2020

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

DAN NEAR VS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance - Case Management Program continued to 03/26/2020 at 08:30 in this department. An Attorney Compliance Statement shall be filed not less than fifteen (15) days prior to hearing. New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later th...

  • Hearing

    Jan 31, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

LOPEZ V. CAMERON FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

First, Plaintiff alleges that Cameron Financial Group Inc. was suspended by the California Franchise Tax Board and the California Secretary of State suspended Cameron Financial Group Inc. in 2008. Thus, Plaintiff argues that the May 4, 2011 Assignment is void, not just voidable. (See SAC, ¶¶ 9-10, 16, 28, 61, 71-77, 98, 107-116, 117-134.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 31, 2020

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 72     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.