Franchise Tax

Useful Resources for Franchise Tax

Recent Rulings on Franchise Tax

226-250 of 1781 results

RE: PET’N FOR FINAL DISTRIBUTION AND FOR COMPENSATION

Proposed order Note: Franchise Tax Board Certificate was abolished as of January 2014 CAROL WU KATHRYN S KORN CAROL WU SCOTT J. JUDSON ESSIE MAE HEIDOHRN JEFFREY WONG CRAIG L. JUDSON KYM TESSA HEIDOHRN Need: 1. Evidence of agreement for proposed non pro-rata distribution. This request is governed by PrC § 11951, et seq., and is not captioned (see CRC § 7.102). 2. Declaration to state need for reserve in excess of $2,000.00.

  • Hearing

    Jan 30, 2020

LI ZHENWEI, ET AL. VS ADARSHA BENJAMIN, ET AL.

This is a case where extraordinary fees are proper, given the complexity of the case, the risk to counsel of not getting compensated due to the contingent nature of the pro bono legal representation, and BENJAMIN’s success thus far in depleting funds from the art show and sales of Plaintiff LI’s paintings, to her own account, and rendering the LLC insolvent, without assets, and suspended by the Franchise Tax Board.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

JAMES CLIFFORD, ET AL VS: DANIEL MORGAN, ET AL

Seventh Cause of Action Cross-Defendant demurs to the 7th COA for Conversion (Tapestry and Bay Village) on the grounds that the COA cannot be maintained by defendant Tapestry Homes, LLC because Tapestry Homes, LLC has been placed on suspended status by the Franchise Tax Board. Cross-Complainant does not dispute this assertion.

  • Hearing

    Jan 24, 2020

HITES VS. GAUBE

Cross- Complainant has provided a copy of a certificate of reviver on reply, indicating that the Alamo Group was relieved of suspension or forfeiture and is now in good standing with the Franchise Tax Board. Phillips Reply Decl. at ¶ 4, Ex. As a consequence, Alamo Group is not precluded from participating in the instant litigation. Cross-Defendant also argues that there is no valid basis for the rescission claim and that Cross- Complainant waived its rights to rescind.

  • Hearing

    Jan 23, 2020

ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM VS AL MIJARES, ET AL.

Franchise Tax Board, (2016) 1 Cal.App.5th 247, 259 (citation omitted). A party cannot by negligence or design withhold issues and litigate them in consecutive actions. Id. Hence the rule is that the prior judgment is res judicata on matters which were raised or could have been raised. Id. A cause of action could have been raised in the prior action if with diligence it could have been brought earlier. Allied Fire, supra, 127 Cal.App.4th at 156.

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

KAREN SINGH VS. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA

Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per is required. Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice. Please note that case scheduled for a CMC Thursday 8:30 A.M. in Department 23 on or after January 10,2020 will be heard in Department 4...

  • Hearing

    Jan 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

FAIR EDUCATION SANTA BARBARA, INC., ET AL. V. SANTA BARBARA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL.

Franchise Tax Board (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 978, 991. As detailed in the declaration of Peter D. Scott (provisionally admitted as an offer of proof only): ● On September 11, 2018, plaintiff’s attorney spoke at the SBUSD Board Meeting in response to the agenda item concerning SBUSD’s anticipated contract with JCCC.

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2020

ESTATE OF JOSEPHINE FRANCES CARLENTINE

No such document was filed showing notice to Decedent’s son (Casey Carlentine). 2) Notice to Franchise Tax Board. Notice MUST have been given to the Franchise Tax Board not later than 90 days after the date letters are first issued. (Prob. Code, § 9202, subd. (c)(1).) The petition does not allege (at paragraph 7) that any notice was given to the Franchise Tax Board. 3) Notice to Relevant State Entities.

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2020

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

ESTATE OF JOEL WAYNE ROBBINS

No such document was filed. 2) Notice to Franchise Tax Board. Notice MUST have been given to the Franchise Tax Board not later than 90 days after the date letters are first issued. (Prob. Code, § 9202, subd. (c)(1).) 3) Accounting or Waivers. The final account does not comply with Probate Code in the following ways: - Total Charges do not equal Total Credits. (Prob. Code, § 1061(c).) - The summary is not supported by detailed schedules. (Prob. Code, §1062.

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2020

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR FIRST & FINAL APPROVAL & INSTRUCTIONS

Verified declaration by petitioner to show that notice of administration was given to the Franchise Tax Board. PrC § 9202(c)(1) 4. Verified declaration by petitioner to provide information requested in PrC §12201(a) 5. Proof of mailing Notice of Hearing with required advisement under PrC §12201(b) 6. Verified declaration to add names and addresses of all parties entitled to notice CEASAR McGLOTHLIN ETHEL L ODEN-BROWN J EDWARD MARSHALL TAMI R EVANS PETER A HASS

  • Hearing

    Jan 09, 2020

RE: FIRST AND FINAL ACCT AND REPORT OF PUBLIC ADMIN

Franchise Tax Board Certificate was abolished as of January 2014 GIOVANNA BOBINCHECK SARAH SUMMERALL JOHN BOBINCHECK Need: 1. Appearances ANTHONY F LOFORTE SR KEVIN M RODRIQUEZ ANTHONY FRANCIS LOFORTE SR BART FLOOD EFREN DELGADILLO EFREN DELGADILLO JR KATHERINE LOUISE LOFORTE-DELGA

  • Hearing

    Jan 09, 2020

TOTAL LENDER SOLUTIONS, INC VS RED DOOR ASSETS, LLC

The case proceeded to bench trial on July 29, 2019 whereby the Court found that: (1) defendant Red Door's claim had priority and was entitled to receive $21,435.42 from the interplead funds; (2) defendant Doshi was entitled to receive $26,988.73 from the interplead funds; and (3) defendant Franchise Tax Board was entitled to receive $95,686.27 from the interplead funds.

  • Hearing

    Jan 09, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

KAREN BEHRNDT VS LAWRENCE FARWELL

Franchise Tax Bd., 38 Cal.4th 897, 912 (2006) [citation omitted]. Documents filed with administrative agencies are not official acts of the agency. Even if they were, the court could not take judicial notice of facts asserted in the documents. “While we may take judicial notice of court records and official acts of state agencies (Evid. Code, § 452, subds. (c), (d)), the truth of matters asserted in such documents is not subject to judicial notice (Sosinsky v.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2020

PETITION OF QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP

To hear....

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  • County

    San Diego County, CA

CHRISTOPHER MARTINEZ VS LIVE TALKS PRODUCTIONS, LLC, ET AL.

Plaintiff knew that Live Talks had been suspended by the Franchise Tax Board and that it was undergoing revival efforts. (Id., ¶¶ 13-14, Exh. C.) Despite this, Plaintiff did not warn Live Talks he would submit an application for entry of default against it. (Id., ¶ 15.) Although setting aside default due to failure to warn is not required, the Court finds that it is appropriate here because of Live Talks’ situation with the Franchise Tax Board. 1.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

DIANA LEJINS, ET AL. VS CITY OF LONG BEACH

Franchise Tax Board, (2006) 39 Cal.4th 750, 758; Dominguez Energy v. County of Los Angeles, (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 839, 852. D. Statement of Facts[3] 1. Petitioners’ Evidence On September 30, 2016, Petitioner Lejins brought an action against the City challenging LBWD’s payment of “pipeline permit fees” to the City’s General Fund pursuant to Long Beach Municipal Code (“LBMC”) section 15.44.100.

  • Hearing

    Jan 02, 2020

TOTAL LENDER SOLUTIONS, INC VS RED DOOR ASSETS, LLC

The Court on its own motion continues the hearing on this matter to an appearance hearing at 1:30 pm on January 10, 2020. No additional papers may be filed. This ruling is the order of the Court, filed as of this date. No formal order is required....

  • Hearing

    Dec 31, 2019

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

LONGEVITY TIME MANAGEMENT, INC. VS L'ANTICA PIZZERIA DA MICHELE USA, LLC

Accordingly, this ground for demurrer is persuasive, but Plaintiff must be given an opportunity to obtain relief from the voidability provisions by making an application to the Franchise Tax Board. The demurrer to the entire Complaint is SUSTAINED with leave to amend. Plaintiff is given 120 days to obtain relief pursuant to Rev. & Tax Code § 23305.1 and to file an amended complaint alleging that such relief was obtained. Defendant’s request for sanctions pursuant to CCP § 128.5(a) is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Dec 31, 2019

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

TANYA TARVER VS ZONE FUNDING, ET AL.

Franchise Tax Bd. (2016) 1 Cal. App. 5th 247, 257. On review of the Demurrer, and the cases attached to Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice on the Demurrer, the Court finds that the determinations in three prior actions give rise to a determination on the basis of res judicata: EC063043, VC064953, and BC643382.

  • Hearing

    Dec 20, 2019

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

PETITION OF MARY HERNANDEZ

Verified declaration by petitioner to show that notice of administration was given to the Franchise Tax Board.

  • Hearing

    Dec 19, 2019

RE: FIRST REPORT AND ACCT, PET’N FOR PRELIMINARY DIST, COMPENSATION

Verified declaration by petitioner to show that notice of administration was given to the Franchise Tax Board. PrC § 9202(c)(1) GARY JOHN MUGG GEORGE GONZALEZ AMY ALVIS PHAN LE MUGG CONNIE YI PHAN LE MUGG JENNIFER L BROWN

  • Hearing

    Dec 19, 2019

PETITION OF WESTERN PROGRESSIVE, LLC

House Family Limited Partnership; lien recorded: 11/5/10; (2) Employment Development Department; lien recorded: 11/18/10; (3) Arizona Tile, LLC; lien recorded: 11/29/10; (4) Franchise Tax Board; lien recorded: 4/9/12. Because the amount of the Arizona Tile lien far exceeds the deposited amount, the funds shall be distributed to M. House, the Employment Development Department, and Arizona Tile, in that order, in the following amounts: (1) The M.

  • Hearing

    Dec 18, 2019

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  • County

    San Diego County, CA

ANDREA Y OBREON PULIDO ET AL VS MICHAEL JOSEPH BONGIORNO

A corporation suspended by the California Franchise Tax Board may not participate in litigation activities. (Rev. & Tax Code § 23301; Palm Valley Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Design MTC (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 553.) Under the California Revenue and Taxation Code section 23301, however, a corporation still has a duty to respond to these requests despite it being unable to defend against the legal claims against it. (See Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v.

  • Hearing

    Dec 18, 2019

ESTATE OF LAURETTE M. STERN

Using Local Form SC-6028 would have guarded against this issue. 2) Notice to Franchise Tax Board. Notice MUST have been given to the Franchise Tax Board not later than 90 days after the date letters are first issued. (Prob. Code, § 9202, subd. (c)(1).) The allegation in the petition does not specify the date notice was sent to the FTB. Using Local Form SC-6028 would have guarded against this issue. 3) Notice to Relevant State Entities.

  • Hearing

    Dec 17, 2019

PACIFICREALTORS.NET VS. DAVID KLEIN

It lacks any capacity to bring this action because its powers have been suspended by the Secretary of State for nonpayment of the corporate franchise tax. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 23301; Reed v. Norman (1957) 48 Cal.2d 338, 342, 309 P.2d 809.) The Court continued the hearing on this motion from November 15, 2019, to this date upon plaintiff's counsel's representation that plaintiff's capacity would be restored. That has not occurred. Plaintiff's counsel represents that will occur by December 31, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Dec 17, 2019

  « first    1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 72     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.