What is a Disclaimer?

Useful Resources for Disclaimer

Rulings on Disclaimer

476-494 of 494 results

STEVE TEPPER ET AL VS ALAN NOELLE ENGINEERING ET AL

[PSS #10] The Installation Manual also provides a disclaimer that “Every type of battery can produce hydrogen gas” and “Batteries contain corrosive acids or caustic alkalis and toxic materials and can rupture and leak if mistreated.” [PSS #11] The system was started up in January, 2008. [PSS #12]: The PMO where the battery cabinet was installed was also the office out of which Tepper worked during his tenure at the Theater.

  • Hearing

    Jul 05, 2017

ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL.

These regulations apply to “special statements and claims,” including “instructional or disclaimer statements concerning pathogens (e.g., ‘for cooking only’ or ‘not tested for E. coli O157:H7’).” (9 C.F.R. §412.1, subd. (c)(3) and (e).)

  • Hearing

    Sep 06, 2019

  • Judge

    Presiding

  • County

    Santa Clara County, CA

ED POSHKUS ET AL VS ANGEL MARTINES ET AL

Other than Forms 10-K (Exhibits 5 and 6), all of the SEC exhibits have the same disclaimer regarding accuracy. The court grants the request to take judicial notice of Exhibits 5, 6, 18- 31 and 35-36. But, again, the court does not take judicial notice of the truth of matters asserted in any of those documents. Certificate of Incorporation: Exhibit 34 is a certified copy of Deckers’ certificate and amended and restated articles of incorporation. This is subject to judicial notice.

  • Hearing

    Mar 21, 2013

STEVE TEPPER ET AL VS ALAN NOELLE ENGINEERING ET AL

[PSS #10] The Installation Manual also provides a disclaimer that “Every type of battery can produce hydrogen gas” and “Batteries contain corrosive acids or caustic alkalis and toxic materials and can rupture and leak if mistreated.” [PSS #11] PSS #12 states: “The Production Manager’s Office (“PMO”) where this battery cabinet was installed was also the office out of which Plaintiff Steve Tepper worked during his tenure at the Granada Theater.” The evidence cited are Exhibits 1, 2, and 11.

  • Hearing

    Jun 14, 2017

PENINSULA PROCEDURE CENTER LP VS ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND

Pratt’s deposition testimony also raises a triable issue of fact: She testified that during call, there was a disclaimer that the call would be recorded and that “if there was a discrepancy between the benefits stated on the phone call and the benefits determined by the plan, the benefits of the plan would win.” Pratt Depo. at Page 37:4-18.

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

TERESITA ALBA INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE TERESITA A. ALBA TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 1, 2016, VS H&O UNIQUE CONSTRUCTION, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

“A licensee is entitled to act as a principal in a transaction from the beginning, without entering into an agency relationship and with a full disclaimer of an agency. A licensee acting solely as a principal without any prior agency relationship still has a duty of honest and fair dealing, but does not assume fiduciary duties toward the other parties to the transaction.” (Miller & Starr, Cal. Real Estate 4th § 4:71.)

  • Hearing

    Apr 09, 2020

GREGG WELSH ET AL VS HADDON DILLON ET AL

Clemens’ request for an additional retainer, transfer of the matter to attorney Umoff, the Montecito BAR notice of hearing regarding the Welsh gate and fence, Umoff’s 6/20/06 e-mail, conduct of the mediation and the stand down agreement, plaintiffs’ filing of the lawsuit and his retention of attorney Gough to represent Gulf, the 2008 dismissal of Gulf from reformation and prescriptive easement causes of action, Gulf’s $1000 settlement with the Welshes with respect to a claim of injury to the gate, Gulf’s 2008 disclaimer

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2013

TOM PAPPAS ET AL VS STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL

The settlement effects the disclaimer of rights already adopted by County and set forth in its Answer. By this settlement, plaintiffs achieve the entirety of the result they seek from County; County gives up nothing it had not already disclaimed and has no liability for attorney’s fees or costs. The settlement does not affect the dispute between the State Defendants and plaintiffs (either individually or as a putative class) in any way.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2013

FAIR EDUCATION SANTA BARBARA, INC., ET AL. V. SANTA BARBARA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL.

Assuming that these programs otherwise fall within the ambit of the statutes asserted in the second, third, and fourth causes of action, it appears from this evidence—particularly Rosenberg’s disclaimer in this context that she is “not opposed to implicit bias training as long as it does not denigrate or marginalize one group over another on the basis of race, gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation”—the indicated discussion at the workshop involved implicit bias.

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2019

RE: PET’N FOR ORDER AUTHORIZING GAL TO EXECUTE DISCLAIMER

FILED ON 08/10/18 BY NATALIE BORREANI Need: Verified declaration by petitioner to state names, current addresses and relationships of all persons entitled to receive notice. LR 7.112 so Court can confirm mailing CHARLES JOSEPH BORREANI III NATALIE BORREANI JENNIFER A MORSE Need: 1. Verified declaration by petitioner to clari...

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2018

WHAL PROPERTIES LP VS. DAVID C PRINGLE & ASSOCIATES INC

Defendants David C. Pringle and David C. Pringle and Associates' ("Defendants") motion to continue trial is DENIED. Defendants argue that good cause exists to continue the March 14, 2016 trial for numerous reasons. First, Defendants assert that the Court unilaterally set the trial date for a date on which Defendants' primary trial counsel will ...

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2015

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

SACRAMENTO AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY VS. JAVID T SIDDIQUI

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is referred to the Trial Setting Process effective 9/15/2011 to allow discovery to be completed, unless Notice of Settlement, pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1385, or dismissal is filed. This case is referred to Master Calendar for selection of Trial and Mandatory Sett...

  • Hearing

    Apr 05, 2011

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Breach

SACRAMENTO AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY VS. JAVID T SIDDIQUI

Plaintiff Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency's ("SAFCA") motion to relate the instant case to fifteen other cases set forth below under California Rule of Court, Rule 3.300 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion to assign these cases to a single judge for all purposes under CRC, Rule 3.734 is DENIED. The cases will, however, be assigned to a single judge...

  • Hearing

    Dec 14, 2011

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Breach

WHAL PROPERTIES LP VS. DAVID C PRINGLE & ASSOCIATES INC

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This case is referred to Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates. All counsel (including parties appearing in pro per) shall confer and agree upon trial and settlement conference dates. Available dates can be obtained on the court's web site...

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2014

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

ANGELO BULLO LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. VERNA LIN ET AL

Hearing On Order To Show Cause SET FOR HEARING ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2006, AT 10:15AM, LINE 9, Plaintiffs Order To Show Cause, A HEARING IS REQUIRED. =(302/REQ/AP)...

  • Hearing

    Dec 05, 2006

ANGELO BULLO LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. VERNA LIN ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE CROSS COMPLAINT SET FOR HEARING ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 2007, LINE 7. CROSS-DEFENDANT SUPER HOMES INC.'S MOTION TO STRIKE CROSS-COMPLAINT IS OFF CALENDAR, AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT FILED. =(302/PJB)...

  • Hearing

    May 09, 2007

ANGELO BULLO LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. VERNA LIN ET AL

Hearing On Order To Show Cause SET FOR HEARING ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2006 AT 10:30AM, LINE 12, Order To Show Cause, A HEARING IS REQUIRED. =(302/REQ/AP)...

  • Hearing

    Dec 14, 2006

ANGELO BULLO LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. VERNA LIN ET AL

DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT SET FOR HEARING ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 24, 2007, LINE 9. DEFENDANTS VERNA LIN, STEPHEN YANG AND 327 BAY STREET ASSOCIATES', DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT IS OVERRULED. =(302/PJM/KD)...

  • Hearing

    Jan 24, 2007

ANGELO BULLO LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. VERNA LIN ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE ANSWER TO CROSS COMPLAINT SET FOR HEARING ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 2007, LINE 7. CROSS-COMPLAINANT SUPER HOMES INC.'S MOTION TO STRIKE ANSWER TO CROSS-COMPLAINT IS OFF CALENDAR, AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT FILED. =(302/PJB)...

  • Hearing

    May 09, 2007

  « first    1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.