What is a Disclaimer?

Useful Resources for Disclaimer

Rulings on Disclaimer

226-250 of 493 results

ESTATE OF VISTRO

He pointed out that a disclaimer of interest has been filed on behalf of Mr. Vistro. It does not appear in the minutes whether his clients objected to the request for a period of six months within which to close the matter.

  • Hearing

    Mar 06, 2007

IN THE MATTER OF JOHN H. DODSON

. §6401) and the filed disclaimer of interest by Patricia Hiner. (Pr. C. §275) Extraordinary Fee Requests: Attorneys request extraordinary fees of $6,687.00 for 21.7 hours at $395.00/hour (See Schwartz declaration and Exhibit I).

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2019

IN THE MATTER OF THE JOSEPH I FRIEDRICH TRUST NO 2

However, to rewrite the trust in order to advance large blocks of principal, in the absence of Gloria's full disclaimer of rights under the trust, to borrowers with no ability to repay, directly violates trust terms and trust purpose. Discuss. gmr

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2018

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF THE JOSEPH I FRIEDRICH TRUST NO 2

However, to rewrite the trust in order to advance large blocks of principal, in the absence of Gloria's full disclaimer of rights under the trust, to borrowers with no ability to repay, directly violates trust terms and trust purpose. Discuss. gmr

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2018

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

FRANCISCO DIAZ VS. MARIA LUNA

The Court overrules the objections made as to request numbers 7, 8, and 9, as well as those contained in the disclaimer preceding the responses; Diaz waived any objections to the requests for production of documents because he failed to timely respond to this set of discovery. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd. (a).) The remaining responses that "Plaintiff has already complied and produced these documents at his deposition" do not comply with the Discovery Act and are insufficient.

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2018

DML ENTERPRISES, LLC VS AUGUSTINE MORENO, ET AL.

Opposing party, Robert Pedersen’s request for judicial notice of the disclaimer on the website of the Los Angeles County Assessor relating to maps is granted, in part, and denied, in part. The Court only takes judicial notice of the existence of the disclaimer but does not take judicial notice of the truth of any matters set forth in the disclaimer. Demurrers A demurrer tests the sufficiency of a complaint as a matter of law and raises only questions of law. (Schmidt v.

  • Hearing

    Sep 03, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF THE JOSEPH I FRIEDRICH TRUST NO 2

However, to rewrite the trust in order to advance large blocks of principal, in the absence of Gloria's full disclaimer of rights under the trust, to borrowers with no ability to repay, directly violates trust terms and trust purpose. Discuss. gmr

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2018

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

RE: PET’N FOR INSTRUCTIONS SEEKING ORDERS

Copy of POA attached to Disclaimer filed 10-22-19 is incomplete. 3. Order for Probate Form DE-140 BRIAN DOUGLAS PRICE NEAL C. PRICE JANICE CROSETTI-TITMUS Need: 1. Petition verified. PrC § 1021. CCP § 2015.5. CRC 7.103 2. Adoption of the petition by petitioner’s counsel. Petition is unsigned. 3. Proof of Publication. PrC § 8120 4. Proof of mailing Notice of Petition to Administer Estate and copy of petition to all heirs and beneficiaries. PrC § 8110; LR 7.151(e) 5.

  • Hearing

    Jan 16, 2020

IN RE THE ESTATE OF CHARLES H. SCHOLTING, DECEASED

The court may only recognize a disclaimer that complies with the requirements of Probate Code section 280 et seq. 2. Counsel is reminded that in probate matters, the “title of each pleading and of each proposed order must clearly and completely identify the nature of the relief sought or granted.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 7.102.) Here, the caption did not mention a reserve, waiver of accounting, or first and final accounting. 3. The petitioner seeks a reserve of $10,000.

  • Hearing

    Apr 11, 2019

IN THE MATTER OF THE JOSEPH I FRIEDRICH TRUST NO 2

However, to rewrite the trust in order to advance large blocks of principal, in the absence of Gloria's full disclaimer of rights under the trust, to borrowers with no ability to repay, directly violates trust terms and trust purpose. Discuss. gmr

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2018

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF THE JOSEPH I FRIEDRICH TRUST NO 2

However, to rewrite the trust in order to advance large blocks of principal, in the absence of Gloria's full disclaimer of rights under the trust, to borrowers with no ability to repay, directly violates trust terms and trust purpose. Discuss. gmr

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2018

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

RE: STATUS REPORT REQUEST T'TEE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION

Disclaimer filed 1-24-18 indicates there was a brokerage and savings account. 5. Date Inventory and Appraisal. 6. File a Corrected Inventory and Appraisal with securities in Charles Schwab Brokerage Account appraised by Probate Referee, if needed. 7. File a verified declaration to specify whether all charges for probate referee’s services, if any, have been paid. LR 7.317 8.

  • Hearing

    Apr 24, 2018

FRANCISCO DIAZ VS. MARIA LUNA

The Court overrules the objections made as to request numbers 7, 8, and 9, as well as those contained in the disclaimer preceding the responses; Diaz waived any objections to the requests for production of documents because he failed to timely respond to this set of discovery. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd. (a).) The remaining responses that "Plaintiff has already complied and produced these documents at his deposition" do not comply with the Discovery Act and are insufficient.

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2018

FRANCISCO DIAZ VS. MARIA LUNA

The Court overrules the objections made as to request numbers 7, 8, and 9, as well as those contained in the disclaimer preceding the responses; Diaz waived any objections to the requests for production of documents because he failed to timely respond to this set of discovery. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd. (a).) The remaining responses that "Plaintiff has already complied and produced these documents at his deposition" do not comply with the Discovery Act and are insufficient.

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2018

FRANCISCO DIAZ VS. MARIA LUNA

The Court overrules the objections made as to request numbers 7, 8, and 9, as well as those contained in the disclaimer preceding the responses; Diaz waived any objections to the requests for production of documents because he failed to timely respond to this set of discovery. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd. (a).) The remaining responses that "Plaintiff has already complied and produced these documents at his deposition" do not comply with the Discovery Act and are insufficient.

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2018

JAMES T. O'HEARN, TRUSTEE VS ROSLAND CAPITAL LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPNAY, ET AL.

The agreement contains potentially substantively unconscionable provisions, such as a shortened statute of limitations, limitation on damages and a disclaimer of any fiduciary duty. The arbitration clause itself, however, is not unconscionable—it does not impose any excessive costs on plaintiff (e.g. requiring a three-arbitrator panel agreement or that plaintiff pay all fees), and it does not lack mutuality.

  • Hearing

    Oct 08, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

FRANCISCO DIAZ VS. MARIA LUNA

The Court overrules the objections made as to request numbers 7, 8, and 9, as well as those contained in the disclaimer preceding the responses; Diaz waived any objections to the requests for production of documents because he failed to timely respond to this set of discovery. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd. (a).) The remaining responses that "Plaintiff has already complied and produced these documents at his deposition" do not comply with the Discovery Act and are insufficient.

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2018

IN THE MATTER OF SEBASTIAN F. PEREZ

The assignment from Inez to her sister is not in the nature of a disclaimer; it appears to be a gift; with any associated gift tax consequences. gmr

  • Hearing

    Apr 19, 2011

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF MARY ELIZABETH LINDSAY

The proposed distribution of the estate balance to surviving son Louis Lee is consistent with the laws of intestate succession as modified by woody's disclaimer. The statutory attorney fee in this case is $10,013.82 (petitioner's cross-calculation at ¶10 of the petition omits $100,000 from the 2% line). Of this sum, the court awards Mr. Barlow one-half, or $5006. (Prob.C.§ 10814 , allocated between attorney representation and self--representation.) Extraordinary attorney time was spent by Mr.

  • Hearing

    Jul 11, 2013

FRANCISCO DIAZ VS. MARIA LUNA

The Court overrules the objections made as to request numbers 7, 8, and 9, as well as those contained in the disclaimer preceding the responses; Diaz waived any objections to the requests for production of documents because he failed to timely respond to this set of discovery. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd. (a).) The remaining responses that "Plaintiff has already complied and produced these documents at his deposition" do not comply with the Discovery Act and are insufficient.

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2018

RE: 171 E. GROVE STREET POMONA CA 91767

On 3/6/17, the court received a Disclaimer filed by the United States IRS. The court is also in receipt of a claim filed by Maria Fernandez, the former owner. The Court is not in receipt of any claims from other lienholders. Based on order of priority, the Clerk is ordered to disburse $57,543.14 to Maria Fernandez.

  • Hearing

    Mar 30, 2017

OLIVER V. PACIFIC REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, INC.

Other third parties affected by the disclaimer of interest have not been properly noticed of the subject motion. Movant is aware there have been multiple civil actions in this court prosecuted to judgment against Movant and/or Pacific Real Estate Holdings, Inc. Cases include VCU209730 (Oliver v. Kraft), VCU207364 (Mitchell Brown v. Artesia, etc.), VCU217841 Oliver v. Pacific Real Estate Holdings, Inc. (this action), and VCU213991 (Orix Financial v. Oliver).

  • Hearing

    Oct 11, 2018

IN THE MATTER OF MIRIAM E. SCHWAB

Executor shall designate the selected charity or charities to receive 30% of the preliminary distribution, with an associated disclaimer of any associated fee, commission or the compensation for the referral, plus a declaration as to why the particular charity or charities would be appropriate to the deceased testator. Executor shall provide the court with a spreadsheet of all creditor's claims and liens or encumbrances associated with the 17 currently appraised parcels of real property. gmr

  • Hearing

    Aug 09, 2018

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

IN THE MATTER OF THE JOSEPH I FRIEDRICH TRUST NO 2

However, to rewrite the trust in order to advance large blocks of principal, in the absence of Gloria's full disclaimer of rights under the trust, to borrowers with no ability to repay, directly violates trust terms and trust purpose.

  • Hearing

    Dec 20, 2018

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

GONZALEZ VS ACACIA MOBILE HOME PARK LLC [E-FILE]

Notwithstanding Lee and Associates' disclaimer and the requirement for due diligence by the buyer Acacia, there are issues of fact whether Rodeo's silence fraudulently induced Acacia to enter into the purchase agreement. Rodeo's objections to the memo are overruled as it was offered as evidence as defendant's exhibit 1.

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  « first    1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.