How must an attorney preserve confidential information?

Useful Resources for Confidential Information

Recent Rulings on Confidential Information

76-100 of 10000 results

IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER ARDEN SCOTT BURK

For general information regarding Judge Lund and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.judgerogerlund.com.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

CALIFORNIA STATE GRANGE V. LOS OLIVOS COMMUNITY ORG

Plaintiff’s attorney identifies exhibits by exhibit letter, but does not include a brief description of the exhibit. (See Skinner Declaration, Huber Declaration.) Defendant’s counsel includes bookmarks for Exhibit G only. (See Fayard Declaration.) Bookmarks are critical to efficient navigation of electronic documents, particularly in records as dense as this.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

ROBERT WOOD VS GENERAL MOTORS, LLC

Defendant’s objections on the ground of attorney-client privilege and attorney work-product doctrine are SUSTAINED to the extent they are implicated in answers. Defendant may object at the deposition on the ground that certain information sought within the category is privileged.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

IN THE MATTER OF: CHIARA AURELIA DE BRACONIER D'ALPHEN

Petitioner may file a new petition and must provide Probation with a proper California driver’s license number or California id number or other personal identifying information on the criminal history assessment form (LASC CIV 226) sufficient to allow Probation to run an automated search of Petitioner’s criminal history. Court Clerk to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

FENGXIA HUAI VS CALIFORNIA INVESTMENT REGIONAL CENTER, LLC, ET AL.

Plaintiff alleges in the SAC that CIRC marketed the project to Plaintiff (See, e.g., FAC, ¶¶14-15); that Fang of Hawaii LP/CIRC spoke to Plaintiff in August 2016, provided Plaintiff with information regarding the project, and explained that if Plaintiff invested in the project, Fang could help with the EB-5 application and had immigration lawyers to refer to Plaintiff (Id., ¶17); that, during this conversation, Fang provided Plaintiff with contact information for his assistant, Frank Chao (“Chao”), in Hawaii

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

MYLENE FAROOQ VS. BANK OF AMERICA N.A., ET AL.

On February 8, 2018, the court granted the motion of counsel for plaintiff to withdraw as attorney of record.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Foreclosure

IN THE MATTER OF THE AKELA NANG XAYASOUNTHONE SETTLEMENT

Counsel to appear and provide the below information: Amended Petition, item 17:The petition states that the beneficiary resides in the trust- owned home, but the house is not listed as a trust asset on the schedules. The petitioner shall clarify. HYBRID Page 3

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

IN THE MATTER OF THE LEROY & MARGARET KING TRUST

Counsel to appear and provide the court with the following information: 1. Schedule C (Disbursements): There are multiple payments to ServPro on December 19 and 22, 2018 and January 17, 2019 for house cleaning, totaling $29,719.43. These seem extremely high and there is no explanation for this. The petitioner shall clarify. 2. Schedule C (Disbursements): There are two payments to the Franchise Tax Board on April 16 and 18, 2019 totaling $318,616.00.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

CHARLIE FAGAN VS JANAKA N. DESILVA, ET AL.

Vincent attests he is a Georgia-licensed attorney and not a licensed attorney in California. (Declaration of William Slater Vincent (“Vincent Decl.”), ¶ 1.) Vincent considers his state of residence to be Georgia, never considered California to be his domicile, was last physically present in California in 2009, and has never consented to jurisdiction in California. (Id., ¶¶ 2, 22-23, 26-27.) The court finds there is no general jurisdiction.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

IN RE THE ESTATE OF ERIC R. STINE, DECEASED

Fourth and Final Report of Administrator on Waiver of Account and Petition for Allowance of Costs, For Allowance of Statutory Administrator and Attorney Fees, For Allowance of Attorney Fees for Extraordinary Services, and for Termination of Proceeding and Discharge Objection to Petition for Final Distribution; Waiver of Account (PC § 10950) and for Alternate Distribution (PC § 11640) Administrator’s Response to Objection to Petition for Final Distribution; Waiver of Account (PC § 10950) and for Alternate Distribution

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

LUDLOW V. VALLI CONSTR., INC., ET AL.

THE PARTIES MAY JOIN THIS COURT CALENDAR REMOTELY UTILIZING THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Join Zoom Meeting https://solano-courts-ca- gov.zoom.us/j/83512793514?

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

ALAIN JEROME FERNANDEZ VS ERLINDA DAVID

Plaintiff was no longer an agent of a Power of Attorney for Laxa when Defendant became agent for Power of Attorney for Laxa. (FAC ¶ 17.) Any duty of care on Defendant’s part would be owed to Laxa as Defendant was serving as POA for Laxa. Accordingly, Defendant’s demurrer to the second and third causes of action is SUSTAINED. Leave to Amend Leave to amend must be allowed where there is a reasonable possibility of successful amendment. (Goodman v. Kennedy (1976) 18 Cal.3d 335, 348.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

CARRIEN QIAN HE, AN INDIVIDUAL VS JAY MIN CHEN, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

Plaintiff alleges that on October 18, 2018, without authorization, Chen and Hung filed a new statement of information with the California Secretary of State, naming Hung a Director of Globalinks. Chen, in turn, seeks the involuntary dissolution of Globalinks and alleges that He has engaged in “brutal physical attacks” on Chen.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

ANDRES GOMEZ ET AL. VS U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

Flannigan’s testimony that all inspections were performed by third-party inspectors and were limited to exterior, “drive-by” inspections is made with personal knowledge and foundation as to the information reported to PHH. Objection No. 2 is OVERRULED. Mr. Legendre’s testifies that all information collected by Altisource and its employees is record systems. (Legendre Dec., ¶ 3.) Mr.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

IN THE MATTER OF STERLING JENKINS, SR.

Petition for Approval of Second Account and Report of Trustee; for Approval of Trustee and Attorney Fees and Costs; for Determination of Beneficiaries; and for Preliminary Distribution PREGRANT ORDER The courtroom will be open on January 26, 2021. However, because of emergency orders and public health directives due to the COVID-19 pandemic, neither counsel nor petitioner need appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

E-CLIFTON VENTURES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS ROUNDTREE BH PROPERTY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.

The purpose of these requirements is to cause the moving party to “sufficiently define the issues for the information and attention of the adverse party and the court.” (Hernandez v. National Dairy Products (1954) 126 Cal.App.2d 490, 493, 272 P.2d 799.) (Ibid. [double emphasis added].). Here, Plaintiff’s supporting papers clarify the grounds on which Plaintiff seeks summary judgment.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

VICTOR FAVELA VS SPN INVESTMENTS INC

For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517. Your understanding during these difficult times is appreciated.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

RAMONA 3721 LLC, ET AL. VS CENTERS BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, ET AL.

On September 22, 2020, Gypsum Rose responded to the subpoena with heavily redacted bank statements “that removed the bank account information and most of the transaction information,” and did not produce any other documents responsive to the other requests such as emails and invoices. (Aharonian Decl., ¶ 8.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

ALICE GONZALEZ VS SUPER CENTER CONCEPTS, INC.

Plaintiff does not have any information that Defendant was aware of the piece of paper prior to the fall or that Defendant was aware that there was something on the floor that caused Plaintiff to fall. Plaintiff did not see water on the floor and her body was not wet after the incident. No one told her that there was water on the floor. Plaintiff was asked what made her think there was something on the floor that caused her to fall.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

PEREGRINE GROUP, LLC VS ROBERT WERLE, ET AL.

“[P]laintiff may allege on information and belief any matters that are not within his personal knowledge, if he has information leading him to believe that the allegations are true and thus a pleading made on information and belief is insufficient if it merely assert[s] the facts so alleged without alleging such information that lead[s] [the plaintiff] to believe that the allegations are true.” Gomes v.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

ADAM ACOSTA VS DISTRICT COUNCIL 36 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, ET AL.

Defendant contends that it required the engagement of two separate third party service providers to assist with reviewing electronically stored information. Defendant argues that one of the two vendors lacks capability to address back-up server data to determine whether Defendant has possession, custody, and control of additional information responsive to Plaintiff’s requests.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Discrimination/Harass

HEALTHCARE ALLY MANAGEMENT OF CALIFORNIA, LLC VS BOTTEGA VENETA

Morris’ description of the purpose of a verification call is an information gathering exercise. See Dec of A. Morris, ¶¶8-10. Morris, however, opines medical providers “consider” the verification information to “be the same as the terms of a contract.” Id. at ¶21. Morris’ opinion of what La Peer believed, or whether the words spoken in the verification call is sufficient to create a contract between the parties, is inadmissible.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Judge

    H. Jay Ford

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

REYNA ANGELITA AMEZCUA VS MCDONALD'S CORPORATION ET AL

Practical considerations require that the evaluation be made on the basis of information available at the time of settlement. A defendant's settlement figure must not be grossly disproportionate to what a reasonable person, at the time of the settlement, would estimate the settling defendant's liability to be.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

LLOYD JOSEPH COLLINS VS KARA IMBRIANI, ET AL.

As alleged, the duty is qualified by the extent that Plaintiffs had entrusted Defendants with access to Plaintiffs’ personal and corporate information, and this duty was breached by electronically tracking Plaintiff Collins. However, there are no allegations that Plaintiffs entrusted Imbriani with access to their personal and/or corporate information. Moreover, there are no allegations that Plaintiffs entrusted any information to Defendants.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

RITA HOLLYWOOD SKYLINE, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS EMC PARTNERS, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.

MOTION TO DISQUALIFY Attorneys are forbidden from accepting employment adverse to current or former clients without informed written consent where the attorney, by virtue of his or her current or former representation, “has obtained confidential information material to the employment.” (Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct, rule 3-310(E).) This rule is designed to “protect the confidential relationship … between attorney and client … which continues after the formal relationship ends.” (Henriksen v.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.