When can a judge be held liable?

Useful Resources for Conduct of Judges

Recent Rulings on Conduct of Judges

COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE VS. ELAINE M. HOWLE ET AL

Petitioner Commission On Judicial Performance'S Motion For Issuance Of Petition For Writ Of Prohibitory Mandate Set for hearing on Thursday, August 17, 2017, Line 10, Petitioner Commission On Judicial Performance'S Motion For Issuance Of Petition For Writ Of Prohibitory Mandate Hearing required. The hearing on the petition for writ of m...

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2017

COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE VS. ELAINE M. HOWLE ET AL

Judicial Watch, Inc.'S (Amicus Curiae) Motion To Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice Set for hearing on Thursday, August 17, 2017, Line 10, Judicial Watch, Inc.'S (Amicus Curiae) Motion To Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice Grant, the court will execute the moving parties' form of order. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email t...

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2017

COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE VS. ELAINE M. HOWLE ET AL

Application For Leave To File Amicus Brief In Support Of Respondents Defendants Elaine M. Howle And The California State Auditors Office Set for hearing on Monday, August 14, 2017, Line 10, OTHER JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.'s (AMICUS CURIAE) Application For Leave To File Amicus Brief In Support Of Respondents Defendants Elaine M. Howle And The Califor...

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2017

COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE VS. ELAINE M. HOWLE ET AL

Notice Of Application And Application For Order Shortening Time Set for hearing on Monday, August 14, 2017, Line 11, OTHER JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. (AMICUS CURIAE) Notice Of Application And Application For Order Shortening Time. Continued to August 17, 2017 to be heard at 9:30 a.m. in Department 302. Any party who contests a tentative rulin...

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2017

COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE VS. ELAINE M. HOWLE ET AL

MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE Set for hearing on Monday, August 14, 2017, Line 10, OTHER JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. (AMICUS CURIAE) MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE. Continued to August 17, 2017 to be heard at 9:30 a.m. in Department 302. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to [email protected] with...

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2017

COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE VS. ELAINE M. HOWLE ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Issuance Of Petition For Writ Of Prohibitory Mandate Set for hearing on Monday, August 14, 2017, Line 10, PETITIONER COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE's Motion For Issuance Of Petition For Writ Of Prohibitory Mandate. Continued to August 17, 2017 to be heard at 9:30 a.m. in department 302. Any party who ...

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2017

JULIUS M. ENGEL VS. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA ET AL

Respondent The State Bar Of California Demurrer To Petition For Writ Of Mandate Or In The Alternative Peremptory Writ Set for hearing on Friday, August 4, 2017, Line 3, RESPONDENT THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA's Demurrer To Petition For Writ Of Mandate Or In The Alternative Peremptory Writ Off calendar per the request of the moving party....

  • Hearing

    Aug 04, 2017

COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE VS. ELAINE M. HOWLE ET AL

Notice Of Application And Application For Order Shortening Time Set for hearing on Friday, August 4, 2017, Line 2, OTHER JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.'s (AMICUS CURIAE) Application For Order Shortening Time Continued to be heard at 2:00 p.m. on August 14, 2017 in Department 302 before Judge Stephen Murphy. The court will provide a court reporter...

  • Hearing

    Aug 04, 2017

COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE VS. ELAINE M. HOWLE ET AL

MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE Set for hearing on Friday, August 4, 2017, Line 2, OTHER JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.'s (AMICUS CURIAE) MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE Continued to be heard at 2:00 p.m. on August 14, 2017 in Department 302 before Judge Stephen Murphy. The court will provide a court reporter. =(302/HK)...

  • Hearing

    Aug 04, 2017

COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE VS. ELAINE M. HOWLE ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Issuance Of Petition For Writ Of Prohibitory Mandate Set for hearing on Friday, August 4, 2017, Line 2, PETITIONER COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE's Motion For Issuance Of Petition For Writ Of Prohibitory Mandate Continued to be heard at 2:00 p.m. on August 14, 2017 in Department 302 before Judge Steph...

  • Hearing

    Aug 04, 2017

COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE VS. ELAINE M. HOWLE ET AL

Application For Leave To File Amicus Brief In Support Of Respondents Defendants Elaine M. Howle And The California State Auditors Office Set for hearing on Friday, August 4, 2017, Line 2, OTHER JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.'s (AMICUS CURIAE) Application For Leave To File Amicus Brief In Support Of Respondents Defendants Elaine M. Howle And The Calif...

  • Hearing

    Aug 04, 2017

SUE EICHERLY VS. COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE

DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT Set for hearing for Friday, March 24, 2017, line 16. DEFENDANT COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE'S DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT. Hearing required. The matter will be heard at 2:30 p.m. in department 302 before Judge Murphy. =(302/HEK)...

  • Hearing

    Mar 24, 2017

SUE EICHERLY VS. COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE

DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT Set for hearing for Tuesday, March 21, 2017, line 12. DEFENDANT COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE'S DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT. Judge Kahn has recused himself from hearing matters in this case. Judge Stephen Murphy will hear the demurrer on March 24, 2017 at 2:30 pm in Department 302. =(302/HEK)...

  • Hearing

    Mar 21, 2017

LANNY JAY DUGAR VS. DAVID BJORNBAK

Commission on Judicial Performance (1989) 49 Cal.3d 826, 842 (ridiculing attorneys in open court). 4) Coercing a party to settle the case. Barrientos v. City of Los Angeles (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 63, 71-72 (imposing monetary sanctions on attorneys to coerce settlement). 5) receiving evidence out of Court. Guadalupe A. v. Superior Court (1991) 234 Cal.App.3d 100, 108-109. 6) Coercing jurors into reaching a verdict. Langdon v. Superior Court (1923) 65 Cal.App. 41, 43.

  • Hearing

    Mar 03, 2017

SUE EICHERLY VS. COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE

DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT Matter on calendar for Monday, February 27, 2017, Line 9, DEFENDANT COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT. The matter is continued to March 21, 2017 per the agreement of the parties. =(302/NJL)

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2017

  • Judge NEWTON LAM
  • County

    San Francisco County, CA

NICK NICHOLS VS CITY OF BURBANK

Commission on Judicial Performance (1995) 10 Cal.4th 866, 880–884, 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 606, 897 P.2d 544; Kloepfer v. Commission on Judicial Performance (1989) 49 Cal.3d 826, 833–835, 264 Cal.Rptr. 100, 782 P.2d 239; Pierce, Administrative Law Treatise (4th ed.2002) § 9.9, pp. 688–689.) Thus, “[p]rocedural fairness does not mandate the dissolution of unitary agencies, but it does require some internal separation between advocates and decision makers to preserve neutrality.”

  • Hearing

    Feb 03, 2017

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

BILLRITE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC VS. VINAY MOOLA REDDY

Defendants argue that such an assignment goes against California Code of Judicial Ethics, Canon 2, provides in pertinent part, that a "judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities," and that a judge "shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary."

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2017

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

BILLRITE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC VS. VINAY MOOLA REDDY

Defendants argue that such an assignment goes against California Code of Judicial Ethics, Canon 2, provides in pertinent part, that a "judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities," and that a judge "shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary."

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2017

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

BILLRITE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC VS. VINAY MOOLA REDDY

Defendants argue that such an assignment goes against California Code of Judicial Ethics, Canon 2, provides in pertinent part, that a "judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities," and that a judge "shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary."

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2017

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

BILLRITE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC VS. VINAY MOOLA REDDY

Defendants argue that such an assignment goes against California Code of Judicial Ethics, Canon 2, provides in pertinent part, that a "judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities," and that a judge "shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary."

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2017

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

BILLRITE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC VS. VINAY MOOLA REDDY

Defendants argue that such an assignment goes against California Code of Judicial Ethics, Canon 2, provides in pertinent part, that a "judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities," and that a judge "shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary."

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2017

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

BILLRITE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC VS. VINAY MOOLA REDDY

Defendants argue that such an assignment goes against California Code of Judicial Ethics, Canon 2, provides in pertinent part, that a "judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities," and that a judge "shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary."

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2017

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

BILLRITE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC VS. VINAY MOOLA REDDY

Defendants argue that such an assignment goes against California Code of Judicial Ethics, Canon 2, provides in pertinent part, that a "judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities," and that a judge "shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary."

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2017

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

MONTECITO WATER DISTRICT ET AL VS PRICE POSTEL & PARMA ETC

Code § 703.5 provides, in relevant part: No person presiding at any judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding, and no arbitrator or mediator, shall be competent to testify, in any subsequent civil proceeding, as to any statement, conduct, decision, or ruling, occurring at or in conjunction with the prior proceeding, except as to a statement or conduct that could (a) give rise to civil or criminal contempt, (b) constitute a crime, (c) be the subject of investigation by the State Bar or Commission on Judicial Performance

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2012

HARVEY BLIGHT VS. KEITH HILLEGASS ET AL (ASSIGNED TO JUDGE BROGDON- ALL PURPOSES)

Notice Of Motion For New Trial And Or Removal Of Unlawful Detainer Jurisdiction From State Bar Representation By Fellow Employees And Notice To Add Judge Busch And Mahoney As Defts And Teh Commission On Judidicial Performance Et Al. Set for hearing on Friday, February 20, 2009, line 8, PLAINTIFF HARVEY BLIGHT'S Motion For New Trial And Or Remov...

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2009

  • Judge

    UNKNOWN JUDGE

  • County

    San Francisco County, CA

  « first    1 2 3     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.