What is the Community Redevelopment Law?

Useful Rulings on Community Redevelopment Law

Rulings on Community Redevelopment Law

26-43 of 43 results

CITY OF NORCO A CALIFORNIA CHARTER CITY VS. MICHAEL J COHEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOROF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

In 1945 the Legislature enacted the Community Redevelopment Law, authorizing cities and counties to establish redevelopment agencies to remediate urban decay. (Health & Saf. Code § 33000 et seq.; see also California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 245-46 [“Matosantos”].) 2 Redevelopment agencies funded their activities primarily through what is known as “tax increment financing.”

  • Hearing

    Apr 13, 2018

CITY OF HAYWARD VS. MICHAEL COHEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

. /// Background of Redevelopment Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code §§ 33000, et seq.) (“CRL”) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (“RDAs”) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Cal. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2018

CITY OF RIVERSIDE AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE VS. MICHAEL COHEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 33000, et seq.) (CRL) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (RDAs) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. {Cal. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 01, 2019

CITY OF RIVERSIDE AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE VS. MICHAEL COHEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 33000, et seq.) (CRL) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (RDAs) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Cal. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 01, 2019

CITY OF HAYWARD VS. MICHAEL COHEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

. /// Background of Redevelopment Prior to Jime 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code §§ 33000, et seq.) ("CRL") authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies ("RDAs") to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Cal. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2018

CITY OF CHINO, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS. KELLY BOSLER, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 33000, et seq.) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (RDAs) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Cal. Redevel. Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2020

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO VS. MICHAEL COHEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

LEGAL BACKGROUND In 1945 the Legislature enacted the Community Redevelopment Law, authorizing cities and counties to establish redevelopment agencies to remediate urban decay. (Health & Saf. Code § 33000 et seq.; see also California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 245-46 [“Matosantos”].) 2 Redevelopment agencies funded their activities primarily through what is known as “tax increment” financing.

  • Hearing

    May 18, 2018

CITY OF CHINO, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS. KELLY BOSLER, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 33000, et seq.) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (RDAs) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Cal. Redevel. Assoc. V. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.) "To carry out such redevelopment plans, [RDAs could] acquire real property,... clear land and construct infrastructure necessary for building on project sites [citations], and undertake certain improvements . . . ."

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2020

INLAND VALLEY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY AS SUCCESSOR VS. KEELY BOSLER IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Factual And Procedural Background Background of Redevelopment Prior to Jime 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code §§ 33000, etseq.) ("CRL") authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies ("RDAs") to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. {Cal. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 04, 2020

INLAND VALLEY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY AS SUCCESSOR VS. KEELY BOSLER IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Factual And Procedural Background Background of Redevelopment Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code §§ 33000, et seq.) (“CRL”) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (“RDAs”) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Cal. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 04, 2020

AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

On February 28, 2019, AHF and Liveable LA filed a First Amended Petition for Writ of Mandate and a Complaint for Declaratory Relief, alleging five causes of action: Violations of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Violations of Planning and Zoning Law and Community Redevelopment Law Requirements Violations of Community Redevelopment Law by Failure to Provide Sufficient Affordable Housing in the Hollywood Redevelopment Area Writ of Mandate – Compel Compliance with the CRL Replacement Obligation

  • Hearing

    Nov 15, 2019

LUCIA MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT VS. DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH

The Legislature enacted the Community Redevelopment Law in 1945, authorizing cities and counties to establish redevelopment agencies to remediate blight and urban decay. (Health & Saf Code § 33000 et seq.;' see also California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4"' 231, 245-46 {''Matosantos"].) Redevelopment agenciesftmdedtheir activities primarily through what is known as tax increment financing.

  • Hearing

    Oct 04, 2019

CITY OF BEAUMONT, A CHARTER CITY VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 33000, et seq.) (CRL) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (RDAs) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Cal. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 09, 2019

LUCIA MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT VS. DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH

The Legislature enacted the Community Redevelopment Law in 1945, authorizing cities and counties to establish redevelopment agencies to remediate blight and urban decay. (Health & Saf. Code § 33000 et seq.; 1 see also California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 245-46 [“Matosantos”].) Redevelopment agencies funded their activities primarily through what is known as tax increment financing.

  • Hearing

    Oct 04, 2019

CITY OF BEAUMONT, A CHARTER CITY VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf Code, §§ 33000, et seq.) (CRL) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (RDAs) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Ca/. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 09, 2019

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH VS. KEELY BOSLER, OM HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

For present purposes, it is sufficient to note the following: The Dissolution of Redevelopment Agencies In 1945, the Legislature enacted the Community Redevelopment Law, authorizing cities and counties to establish redevelopment agencies to remediate blight and urban decay. (Health & Saf. Code § 33000 et seq.; 3 see also California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 245-46 [“Matosantos”].)

  • Hearing

    Dec 06, 2019

AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION, ET AL. VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

The FAP assert causes of action for (1) violations of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”); (2) violations of Planning and Zoning Law (“PZL”) and Community Redevelopment Law (“CRL”) requirements; (3) violations of the CRL for failure to provide sufficient affordable housing in the Hollywood Redevelopment Area; (4) writ of mandate to compel compliance with the CRL; and (5) declaratory relief. The FAP alleges in pertinent part as follows.

  • Hearing

    Jun 10, 2019

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

ALLIANCE FOR RESPONSIBLE PLANNING V. EL DORADO COUNTY

Redevelopment Law (Division 24 (commencing with Section 33000) of the Health and Safety Code).

  • Hearing

    Jul 20, 2017

  « first    1 2

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.