What is the Community Redevelopment Law?

Useful Rulings on Community Redevelopment Law

Recent Rulings on Community Redevelopment Law

COALITION TO PRESERVE LA, INC., A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES , A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL.

The Community Redevelopment Law expressly requires that CRA/LA provide the required housing “[p]rior to the time limit on the effectiveness of the redevelopment plan.” (Ibid.) How CRA/LA elects to satisfy the 15% Requirement is a matter of discretion and may be completed at any time before the Hollywood Redevelopment Plan expires on May 7, 2027. (SGSUPP1336, 1304.)

  • Hearing

    Jun 30, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

CITY OF CHINO, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS. KELLY BOSLER, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 33000, et seq.) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (RDAs) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Cal. Redevel. Assoc. V. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.) "To carry out such redevelopment plans, [RDAs could] acquire real property,... clear land and construct infrastructure necessary for building on project sites [citations], and undertake certain improvements . . . ."

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2020

CITY OF CHINO, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS. KELLY BOSLER, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 33000, et seq.) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (RDAs) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Cal. Redevel. Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2020

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

. /// /// /// Background of Redevelopment Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code §§ 33000, et seq.) (“CRL”) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (“RDAs”) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Cal. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Feb 14, 2020

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

. /// /// ' III Background of Redevelopment Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code §§ 33000, et seq.) ("CRL") authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies ("RDAs") to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted commimities. (Cal. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Feb 14, 2020

AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

On February 28, 2019, AHF and Liveable LA filed a First Amended Petition for Writ of Mandate and a Complaint for Declaratory Relief, alleging five causes of action: Violations of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Violations of Planning and Zoning Law and Community Redevelopment Law Requirements Violations of Community Redevelopment Law by Failure to Provide Sufficient Affordable Housing in the Hollywood Redevelopment Area Writ of Mandate – Compel Compliance with the CRL Replacement Obligation

  • Hearing

    Feb 06, 2020

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH VS. KEELY BOSLER, OM HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

For present purposes, it is sufficient to note the following: The Dissolution of Redevelopment Agencies In 1945, the Legislature enacted the Community Redevelopment Law, authorizing cities and counties to establish redevelopment agencies to remediate blight and urban decay. (Health & Saf. Code § 33000 et seq.; 3 see also California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 245-46 [“Matosantos”].)

  • Hearing

    Dec 06, 2019

AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

On February 28, 2019, AHF and Liveable LA filed a First Amended Petition for Writ of Mandate and a Complaint for Declaratory Relief, alleging five causes of action: Violations of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Violations of Planning and Zoning Law and Community Redevelopment Law Requirements Violations of Community Redevelopment Law by Failure to Provide Sufficient Affordable Housing in the Hollywood Redevelopment Area Writ of Mandate – Compel Compliance with the CRL Replacement Obligation

  • Hearing

    Nov 15, 2019

LUCIA MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT VS. DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH

The Legislature enacted the Community Redevelopment Law in 1945, authorizing cities and counties to establish redevelopment agencies to remediate blight and urban decay. (Health & Saf. Code § 33000 et seq.; 1 see also California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 245-46 [“Matosantos”].) Redevelopment agencies funded their activities primarily through what is known as tax increment financing.

  • Hearing

    Oct 04, 2019

LUCIA MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT VS. DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH

The Legislature enacted the Community Redevelopment Law in 1945, authorizing cities and counties to establish redevelopment agencies to remediate blight and urban decay. (Health & Saf Code § 33000 et seq.;' see also California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4"' 231, 245-46 {''Matosantos"].) Redevelopment agenciesftmdedtheir activities primarily through what is known as tax increment financing.

  • Hearing

    Oct 04, 2019

CITY OF BEAUMONT, A CHARTER CITY VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf Code, §§ 33000, et seq.) (CRL) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (RDAs) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Ca/. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 09, 2019

CITY OF BEAUMONT, A CHARTER CITY VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 33000, et seq.) (CRL) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (RDAs) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Cal. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 09, 2019

AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION, ET AL. VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

The FAP assert causes of action for (1) violations of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”); (2) violations of Planning and Zoning Law (“PZL”) and Community Redevelopment Law (“CRL”) requirements; (3) violations of the CRL for failure to provide sufficient affordable housing in the Hollywood Redevelopment Area; (4) writ of mandate to compel compliance with the CRL; and (5) declaratory relief. The FAP alleges in pertinent part as follows.

  • Hearing

    Jun 10, 2019

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL LAW CITY VS. MICHAEL COHEN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

THE RELEVANT LAW The Community Redevelopment Law and Tax Increment Financing In 1945, the Legislature enacted the Community Redevelopment Law, authorizing cities and counties to establish redevelopment agencies to remediate blight and urban decay. (Health primarily through what is known as tax increment financing.

  • Hearing

    Jun 07, 2019

G8 DEVELOPMENT VS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

In so doing, the Legislature declared that "a transfer of assets by a redevelopment agency...is deemed not to be in the furtherance of the Community Redevelopment Law and is thereby unauthorized." Health & Safety Code § 34167.5. In addition, pursuant to Health & Safety Code § 34178(a), "agreements, contracts, or arrangements between the city or county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency and the redevelopment agency are invalid and shall not be binding on the successor agency[.]"

  • Hearing

    Jun 06, 2019

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

CITY OF GLENDALE VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

THE RELEVANT LAW The Community Redevelopment Law and Tax Increment Financing In 1945, the Legislature enacted the Community Redevelopment Law, authorizing cities and counties to establish redevelopment agencies to remediate blight and urban decay. (Health & Saf. Code § 33000 et seq.;' see also California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4* 231, 245-46 ["Matosantos"].) Redevelopment agencies funded their activities primarily through what is known as tax increment financing.

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2019

CITY OF GLENDALE VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

THE RELEVANT LAW The Community Redevelopment Law and Tax Increment Financing In 1945, the Legislature enacted the Community Redevelopment Law, authorizing cities and counties to establish redevelopment agencies to remediate blight and urban decay. (Health & Saf. Code § 33000 et seq.; 1 see also California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 245-46 [“Matosantos”].) Redevelopment agencies funded their activities primarily through what is known as tax increment financing.

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2019

CITY OF RIVERSIDE AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE VS. MICHAEL COHEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 33000, et seq.) (CRL) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (RDAs) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Cal. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 01, 2019

CITY OF RIVERSIDE AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE VS. MICHAEL COHEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 33000, et seq.) (CRL) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (RDAs) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. {Cal. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 01, 2019

INLAND VALLEY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY VS. SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT

Following the announced closures, the California Legislature enacted Assembly Bill No. 419 (presently Health and Safety Code § 33492.40) as part of the Community Redevelopment Law (CRL.)

  • Hearing

    Feb 15, 2019

VERONICA JUAREZ;ET AL VS CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE

“Except for those provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law that are repealed, restricted, or revised pursuant to the act adding this part, all … duties, and obligations previously vested with the former redevelopment agencies, under the Community Redevelopment Law, are hereby vested in the successor agencies.” (Health & Saf. Code, § 34173, subd. (b).) Therefore, the City has the duties previously imposed on the redevelopment agency, and the motion to strike the third cause of action is denied.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2018

CITY OF HAYWARD VS. MICHAEL COHEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

. /// Background of Redevelopment Prior to Jime 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code §§ 33000, et seq.) ("CRL") authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies ("RDAs") to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Cal. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2018

CITY OF HAYWARD VS. MICHAEL COHEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

. /// Background of Redevelopment Prior to June 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code §§ 33000, et seq.) (“CRL”) authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies (“RDAs”) to remediate urban decay and revitalize blighted communities. (Cal. Redevelopment Assoc. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, 246.)

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2018

INLAND VALLEY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY A JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY/FEDERAL BASE REUSE AUTHORITY VS. OSCAR VALDEZ IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUDITOR-CONTROLLER / TREASURER / TAX COLLECTOR

Following the announced closures, the Califomia Legislature enacted Assembly Bill No. 419 (presently Health and Safety Code § 33492.40) as part of Community Redevelopment Law.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2018

INLAND VALLEY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY A JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY/FEDERAL BASE REUSE AUTHORITY VS. OSCAR VALDEZ IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUDITOR-CONTROLLER / TREASURER / TAX COLLECTOR

Following the announced closures, the California Legislature enacted Assembly Bill No. 419 (presently Health and Safety Code § 33492.40) as part of Community Redevelopment Law.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2018

1 2     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.