What is California's policy on clean energy?

Useful Rulings on Clean Energy

Rulings on Clean Energy

1-25 of 243 results

PV2 ENERGY, LLC ET AL VS. RENEWABLE ENERGY TRUST CAPITAL, INC. ET AL

Defendant Renewable Energy Trust Capital, Inc.'S Notice Of Motion And Motion To Dismiss Or In The Alternative Stay The Action Pursuant To California Code Of Civil Procedure ?410.30 Matter on calendar for Wednesday, April 4, 2018, Line 5, DEFENDANT RENEWABLE ENERGY TRUST CAPITAL, INC.'S Notice Of Motion And Motion To Dismiss Or In The Alternative Stay The Action Pursuant To California Code Of Civil Procedure ?410.30. Defendant Renewable Energy Trust Capital, Inc.'

  • Hearing

PV2 ENERGY, LLC ET AL VS. RENEWABLE ENERGY TRUST CAPITAL, INC. ET AL

DEFENDANT RENEWABLE ENERGY TRUST CAPITAL, INC'S Motion To Partially Seal Records. Defendant Renewable Energy Trust Capital, Inc.'s motion to partially seal its memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion to dismiss, the declaration of Karen Morgan, and Exhibit 1 to the declaration of Karen Morgan is granted. No opposition filed and good cause shown per CRC 2.550(d).

  • Hearing

PV2 ENERGY, LLC ET AL VS. RENEWABLE ENERGY TRUST CAPITAL, INC. ET AL

DEFENDANT RENEWABLE ENERGY TRUST CAPITAL, INC.'S Motion To Dismiss Or In The Alternative Stay The Action Pursuant To California Code Of Civil Procedure Sections 410.30 And 418.10. Hearing required. The court reaffirms the previous tentative ruling: Defendant Renewable Energy Trust Capital, Inc.'s motion to dismiss or stay is denied.

  • Hearing

PV2 ENERGY, LLC ET AL VS. RENEWABLE ENERGY TRUST CAPITAL, INC. ET AL

DEFENDANT RENEWABLE ENERGY TRUST CAPITAL, INC'S Motion To Dismiss Or In The Alternative Stay The Action Pursuant To California Code Of Civil Procedure Sections 410.30 And 418.10. Defendant Renewable Energy Trust Capital, Inc.'s motion to dismiss or stay is denied.

  • Hearing

HARVEY MARK EDER VS SCAQMD ET AL

The Federal Clean Air Act (“Clean Air Act”) requires the implementation of solar power as expediently as practicable. Id. The SCAQMD is therefore required to use solar power as the best technology reasonable. Compl. at p.3. SCAQMD’s CEQA document and Plan do not evaluate a total solar conversion plan. Compl. at p.3. The Plan instead uses non-renewable natural gas resources, which is against state policy. Id.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

FIRST CAPITOL CONSULTING INC VS RENEWABLE ENERGY CENTER LLC

., Plaintiff, vs. renewable entergy center llc, et al., Defendants. Case No.: BC 713009 Hearing Date: June 14, 2019 Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m. [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEFENDANT OR BYTTON’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT Background Plaintiff First Capitol Consulting, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on July 5, 2018, against Defendants Renewable Energy Center LLC (“Renewable”) and Ori Bytton (“Bytton”). Default was entered against both Renewable and Bytton on September 14, 2018.

  • Hearing

PV2 ENERGY, LLC ET AL VS. RENEWABLE ENERGY TRUST CAPITAL, INC. ET AL

Notice Of Motion To Partially Seal Records DEFENDANT RENEWABLE ENERGY TRUST CAPITAL, INC.'S Motion To Partially Seal Records IS CONTINUED TO MARCH 20 2017 AT 9:30AM IN DEPT 302, PER THE AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES

  • Hearing

MCKINLEY HOME FOUNDATION VS WEST HILLS CONSTRUCTION INC

Plaintiffs assert that West Hills breached the express warranty (Id., ¶ 28) and “did not perform its obligations under [the] Agreement in breach thereof—namely, by installing a renewable energy power system that failed to provide the promised energy savings” (Id., ¶¶ 32 and 39).

  • Hearing

GEILENFELDT VS EDF RENEWABLE ENERGY INC [E-FILED]

Plaintiff and defendant EDF Renewable Energy, Inc. entered into a written settlement agreement on October 11, 2017. The proposed settlement complies with the requirements of Dunk v. Ford Motor Co., 48 Cal. App. 4th 1794, 1800-1801 (1996). The proposed order should reflect 10 calendar days before the final approval hearing for the administrator to submit a declaration. CPT shall describe what efforts were taken on return envelopes.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

SAEEDEH PAYROVY VS NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY CENTER ET AL

MOVING PARTIES: Defendant Canopy Energy OPPOSITION: None This employment action was filed on March 14, 2017 by plaintiff Saeedeh Payrovy against defendants National Renewable Energy Center, A-1 Solar Power Inc., and Canopy Energy.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

PV2 ENERGY, LLC ET AL VS. RENEWABLE ENERGY TRUST CAPITAL, INC. ET AL

DEMURRER TO 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT SET FOR HEARING ON MONDAY, JULY 10, 2017, LINE 3 DEFENDANT RENEWABLE ENERGY TRUST CAPITAL, INC.'S DEMURRER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT SUSTAINED as to the seventh cause of action without leave to amend and OVERRULED as to all other causes of action.

  • Hearing

THE HYDRO COMPANY INC VS DAYTONA POWER CORP

The potential jurors should have a greater interest in the impact to the local community as the LEAPS project is a renewable energy source in California. California has a greater interest in the outcome of this litigation given the need for renewable energy sources.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

THE HYDRO COMPANY INC VS DAYTONA POWER CORP

The potential jurors should have a greater interest in the impact to the local community as the LEAPS project is a renewable energy source in California. California has a greater interest in the outcome of this litigation given the need for renewable energy sources.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

GEILENFELDT VS EDF RENEWABLE ENERGY INC [E-FILED]

Plaintiff and defendant EDF Renewable Energy, Inc. entered into a written settlement agreement on October 11, 2017. Plaintiff and class counsel were able to obtain a recovery for the class, the average recovery for whom is approximately $10,408.12. The proposed settlement complies with the requirements of Dunk v. Ford Motor Co., 48 Cal. App. 4th 1794, 1800-1801 (1996).

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

KEVIN WOLF VS. CLEAN ENERGY FULES CORP., ET AL.

CLEAN ENERY FUELS CORP., CLEAN ENERGY COMPRESSION CORP. AND IMW INDUSTRIES, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES TENTATIVE RULING: The unopposed motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication brought by defendants Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (“CE Fuels”), Clean Energy Compression Corp. (“CE Compression”), and IMW Industries, Inc. is granted.

  • Hearing

AHN VS CHICAGO TITLE A DIVISION OF FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL

However, Plaintiff alleges that he "was the primary person at Fidelity and Chicago who was competing with Stewart for business in the renewable energy market" and that his "competition needed to be restricted and restrained for the conspiracy and agreement to be successful." (FAC, ¶ 144.) Further, Plaintiff alleges he was recruited by Chicago to compete with Stewart. (FAC, ¶ 13.)

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA VS EMPOWERSBC PROGRAM

The Program “is intended primarily for retrofit activities to replace outdated inefficient equipment and to install new equipment that reduces energy consumption, produces renewable energy, or increases water conservation.” (Id. at p. 6.) The Program is also available to purchasers of new homes and businesses who wish to add improvements after taking title to the property. (Id. at pp. 6-7.)

  • Hearing

AHN VS CHICAGO TITLE A DIVISION OF FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL

However, Plaintiff alleges that he "was the primary person at Fidelity and Chicago who was competing with Stewart for business in the renewable energy market" and that his "competition needed to be restricted and restrained for the conspiracy and agreement to be successful." (FAC, ¶ 144.) Further, Plaintiff alleges he was recruited by Chicago to compete with Stewart. (FAC, ¶ 13.)

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

ENDURANCE AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY VS ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY [E-FILE]

The Motion (ROA # 674) of Defendant and Cross-Complainant VM ENERGY, LLC ("Defendant" or "VM Energy") for summary adjudication of Cross-Defendant and Cross-Complainant JOHNSON & WOOD INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., now known as JAYHUSKERS, INC.)("Johnson & Wood") claims-reporting duties with respect to the underlying claim by Dallas Clean Energy McCommas Bluff, LLC ("DCEMB") against VM Energy (the "DCEMB Claim"), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

MARTINEZ VS YGRENE ENERGY FUND

The Demurrer brought by defendant Ygrene Energy Fund, LLC is SUSTAINED in its entirety with leave to amend. Plaintiff Leila Martinez shall have 30 days leave to amend. Background and Procedural History Defendant Ygrene Energy Fund California, LLC (Defendant, Ygrene, or Lender) administrates a financing program known as Property Assessed Clean Energy or "PACE."

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

ANDY SREDEN VS. GENE SCOTT FEIN

No explanation having been provided for the non-appearance of defendants Genedics, LLC and Genedics Clean Energy, LLC on 8/19/15, the OSC re sanctions as to these defendants remains on calendar.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    Genalin Riley

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

MARTINEZ VS YGRENE ENERGY FUND

The Demurrer brought by defendant Ygrene Energy Fund, LLC is SUSTAINED in its entirety with leave to amend. Plaintiff Leila Martinez shall have 30 days leave to amend. Background and Procedural History Defendant Ygrene Energy Fund California, LLC (Defendant, Ygrene, or Lender) administrates a financing program known as Property Assessed Clean Energy or "PACE."

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

ENDURANCE AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY VS ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY [E-FILE]

The Motion (ROA # 674) of Defendant and Cross-Complainant VM ENERGY, LLC ("Defendant" or "VM Energy") for summary adjudication of Cross-Defendant and Cross-Complainant JOHNSON & WOOD INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., now known as JAYHUSKERS, INC.)("Johnson & Wood") claims-reporting duties with respect to the underlying claim by Dallas Clean Energy McCommas Bluff, LLC ("DCEMB") against VM Energy (the "DCEMB Claim"), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

ENDURANCE AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY VS ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY [E-FILE]

The Motion (ROA # 674) of Defendant and Cross-Complainant VM ENERGY, LLC ("Defendant" or "VM Energy") for summary adjudication of Cross-Defendant and Cross-Complainant JOHNSON & WOOD INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., now known as JAYHUSKERS, INC.)("Johnson & Wood") claims-reporting duties with respect to the underlying claim by Dallas Clean Energy McCommas Bluff, LLC ("DCEMB") against VM Energy (the "DCEMB Claim"), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

ENDURANCE AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY VS ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY [E-FILE]

The Motion (ROA # 674) of Defendant and Cross-Complainant VM ENERGY, LLC ("Defendant" or "VM Energy") for summary adjudication of Cross-Defendant and Cross-Complainant JOHNSON & WOOD INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., now known as JAYHUSKERS, INC.)("Johnson & Wood") claims-reporting duties with respect to the underlying claim by Dallas Clean Energy McCommas Bluff, LLC ("DCEMB") against VM Energy (the "DCEMB Claim"), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.