Citrus Pest Control Law

Useful Rulings on Citrus Pest Control Law

Recent Rulings on Citrus Pest Control Law

HORIZON CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC VS. CITY OF SACRAMENTO

Kern County Citrus Pest Control Dist. (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 878 to support its argument that Petitioners were required to raise their complaints at the protest hearing or be barred from raising them in court. In Wallich’s Ranch, the court held a taxpayer who challenged an assessment imposed under the Citrus Pest District Control Law had to first exhaust his administrative remedies by filing a protest at a public hearing held to set the amount of the assessment.

  • Hearing

HORIZON CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC VS. CITY OF SACRAMENTO

Kern County Citrus Pest Control Dist. (2001) 87 Cal.App.4''' 878 to support its argument that Petitioners were required to raise their complaints at the protest hearing or be barred from raising them in court. In'Wallich's Ranch, the court held a taxpayer who challenged an assessment imposed under the Citms Pest District Control Law had to first exhaust his administrative remedies by filing a protest at a public hearing held to set the amount of the assessment.

  • Hearing

MINER'S CAMP VS. FORESTHILL PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT

Kern County Citrus Pest Control District (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 878. In Wallich’s, the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s finding that the plaintiff’s action was barred based on its failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Citrus Pest District Control Law. The Wallich’s court cited extensively to the decision in People ex rel. Lockyer v.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

1

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.