What is a Case Management Statement in Healthcare?

Useful Resources for Case Management Statement in Healthcare

Rulings on Case Management Statement in Healthcare

126-150 of 195 results

RAHUL RAM VS. MERCY GENERAL HOSPITAL

Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/default judgments on file in accordance with court order of 4/21/2011. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP) Pursuant to Local Rule 11.15 (CMP), an Attorney's Compliance Statement shall be filed not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2011

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

SADHNA RAM VS. CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST

Sanctions imposed for failure to file Case Management Statement in a timely manner in accordance with Local Rule 11.055 (CMP). The Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance - Case Management Program is scheduled for 10/01/2009 at 08:30 AM in Department 43.

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2009

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

JEAN WILLIAMS VS. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL

Sanctions imposed for failure to file Case Management Statement in a timely manner in accordance with Local Rule 11.055 (CMP). The Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance - Case Management Program is scheduled for 05/07/2009 at 08:30 AM in Department 43.

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2009

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY VS. ELECTROLUX INTERNATIONAL

Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP) Pursuant to Local Rule 11.15 (CMP), an Attorney's Compliance Statement shall be filed not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Dec 28, 2011

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

EDWARD HUGULEY VS. MTC FINANCIAL

.: TC028374 Matter on Calendar for: (1) CMC; (2) OSC re: dismissal for failure to prosecute; (3) Hearing on motion for judgment on the pleadings Notes: The Court received and reviewed a Case Management Statement from plaintiffs. Given that the pleadings appear to be unsettled, given the following tentative ruling, the Court likely will continue the CMC to a later date. Tentative Ruling on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings: I.

  • Hearing

    Sep 07, 2017

  • Judge

    Steven D. Blades or Brian S. Currey

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

RONALD DANEK VS. SSC CARMICHAEL OPERATING COMPANY L P

New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 11.055 If the plaintiff does not file a timely Case Management Statement for the next hearing sanctions will be imposed. All Answers or Default Judgments shall be filed by 03/25/2010. To request oral argument on this matter, you must call the Court at (916)874-8243 (Department 44) by 4:00 p.m., the court day before this hearing and advise opposing counsel.

  • Hearing

    Feb 09, 2010

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

LINDA FRAIZER RUBY VS. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC

Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP) Pursuant to Local Rule 11.15 (CMP), an Attorney's Compliance Statement shall be filed not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. All Answers or Default Judgments shall be filed by 03/24/2011.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2011

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

HCR MANORCARE PROPERTIES LLC VS. MARGUERITE D TYLER

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is continued to allow time for Plaintiff to determine if they will set aside the default against defendant Tyler per Case Management Statement. Also to determine if an additional party will be added to the complaint. Parties to be prepared to discuss referral to the trial setting process or alternative dispute resolution at the next hearing.

  • Hearing

    Jun 17, 2011

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Contract - Other

LISA EMDE VS. RANCHO CORDOVA ADULT DAY HEALTH CARE

Plaintiff's motion, which is described in the Case Management Statement, is to be filed forthwith. This case is referred to Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates. All counsel (including parties appearing in pro per) shall confer and agree upon trial and settlement conference dates. Available dates can be obtained on the court's web site athttp://www.saccourt.ca.gov, or by recorded message at 916-874-6098.

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2012

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

DAVID SCHUMACHER VS. TAN PHAM, M.D.

This matter is continued to allow amended complaint to be filed per Case Management Statement. All answers/responsive pleadings or defaults to the amended complaint must be on file prior to the next Case Management Conference.

  • Hearing

    Sep 02, 2009

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

WINDSOR EL CAMINO CARE CENTER, A DELAWARE LLC VS. EMILIO M LOBATO

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Plaintiff has failed to comply with the previous order to file a Case Management Statement in a timely manner for the hearing date of 5/20/2010. The court issues an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance where plaintiff shall show cause why sanctions in the amount of $150.00 should not be imposed against them. The Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance - Case Management Program is scheduled for 07/29/2010 at 08:30 AM in Department 35.

  • Hearing

    May 14, 2010

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

KELSEY DIMITROPOULOS VS. CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST, A CORPORATION

Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP). This case is subject to dismissal for failure to comply with CMP guidelines pursuant to Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    Sep 07, 2011

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

ROBERT C LYON VS. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Sanctions imposed for failure to file Case Management Statement in a timely manner in accordance with Local Rule 11.055 (CMP). The Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance - Case Management Program is scheduled for 04/30/2009 at 08:30 AM in Department 43.

  • Hearing

    Feb 17, 2009

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JULIET TAMURA VS. CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Plaintiff has failed to comply with the previous order to file a Case Management Statement in a timely manner for the hearing date of 6/16/2011. The court issues an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance where plaintiff shall show cause why sanctions in the amount of $150.00 should not be imposed against them. The Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance - Case Management Program is scheduled for 08/18/2011 at 08:30 AM in Department 35.

  • Hearing

    Jun 08, 2011

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

VICTORY PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS MARIACYNTHIA PUNO, ET AL.

At the Case Management Conference on August 4, 2020, Plaintiff had not filed its Proof of Service or Case Management Statement. Plaintiff’s counsel told the court that the “case fell through the cracks.” According to counsel, although defendant had been served on March 20, 2020, counsel had just filed his Proof of Service. Two months later, the Court held an OSC re Entry of Default Judgement. Plaintiff had failed to request default, and of course, had not filed its default judgment package.

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2021

CRYSTAL KIEHM VS. CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST

Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP). This case is subject to dismissal for failure to comply with CMP guidelines pursuant to Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    Apr 17, 2012

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

DAVID SCHUMACHER VS. TAN PHAM, M.D.

This matter is continued to allow additional parties to be added to the Complaint per Plaintiff's Case Management Statement. All answers/responsive pleadings or defaults to the Complaint and Cross Complaint must be on file prior to the next Case Management Conference. Parties to be prepared to discuss referral to the trial setting process or alternative dispute resolution at the next hearing.

  • Hearing

    Nov 25, 2009

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

SOFIA NEW VS. DISTINGUISHED CARE LLC

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Per the filed Case Management Statement, plaintiff states this case was ordered consolidated with case no. CIVMSC10-00925 in Contra Costa County. There is no record of this consolidation in the Sacramento case. The Case Management Conference is continued in order to allow the parties time to conclude settlement discussions.

  • Hearing

    Feb 23, 2012

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

SANDRA PEREZ VS. BAYER CORPORATION

Failure to file a case management statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in additional sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP). Pursuant to Local Rule 11.15 (CMP), an Attorney Compliance Statement shall be filed not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing on 06/02/2011.

  • Hearing

    Mar 03, 2011

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

DOROTHY HUNTER VS FRIENDSHIP ADULT DAY CARE CENTER ET AL

Her 5/7/09 case management statement sets forth economic damages of > $650,000, for total damages claimed of $2.4 million. Easy Lift’s settlement is < 3% of the pain and suffering and emotional distress claim, and about 2% of total claimed damages. There are no facts to suggest its proportionate liability is 2-3%. Easy Lift failed to provide any facts to suggest its settlement has a reasonable relation to any rough approximation of plaintiff’s total recovery, and the settlement cannot be justified.

  • Hearing

    Jul 28, 2009

CHRISTINA SEDANO VS. CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST

Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults to the amended complaint on file in accordance with court order of 5/28/2009. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP). The Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance - Case Management Program is scheduled for 11/12/2009 at 08:30 AM in Department 45.

  • Hearing

    Aug 27, 2009

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

MARK KINYON VS. CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Plaintiff has failed to comply with the previous order to file a Case Management Statement in a timely manner for the hearing date of 5/3/2012. The court issues an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance where plaintiff shall show cause why sanctions in the amount of $150.00 should not be imposed against them. The Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance - Case Management Program is scheduled for 07/05/2012 at 08:30 AM in Department 35.

  • Hearing

    Apr 23, 2012

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ROY GRABENAUER VS. CATHOLIC HEALTH CARE WEST

Sanctions imposed for failure to file Case Management Statement in a timely manner in accordance with Local Rule 11.055 (CMP). The Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance - Case Management Program is scheduled for 11/05/2009 at 08:30 AM in Department 43.

  • Hearing

    Aug 28, 2009

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

SANDRA SHEWRY DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES VS. MICHAEL D STECKBAR

Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to serve defendant Michael Steckbar or file a request for service by publication in accordance with court order of 8/13/2009. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP). The Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance - Case Management Program is scheduled for 01/21/2010 at 08:30 AM in Department 45.

  • Hearing

    Oct 23, 2009

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

WALNUT WHITNEY CARE CENTER INC VS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENTOF PUBLIC HEALTH

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Per the filed Case Management Statement, the Plaintiff states parties have agreed to attempt informal resolution of this matter. This matter is referred to the Trial Setting Process effective 4/5/2012, to allow discovery to be completed and/or possible resolution. This case is referred to Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2011

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.