What is a Case Management Statement in Healthcare?

Useful Resources for Case Management Statement in Healthcare

Rulings on Case Management Statement in Healthcare

76-100 of 195 results

AZZAM VS DRUCKER MD

JTD issue of sanctions against Plaintiff/Counsel for failure to file Case Management Statement timely prior to CMC 09/19/14. CRC 3.725(a). Defendant Drucker was sub-served on 09/26/14, but no response or default has been filed to date. CRC 3.110(g). JTD status of response/default/dismissal of this defendant. Response to Item 19b in Case Management Statements is insufficient/incomplete. JTD date for OSC re sanctions.

  • Hearing

    Nov 26, 2014

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

  • Judge

    Miles Lang

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

DUANE CHAPMAN VS. RYAN EXLINE

The Mandatory CMC/OSC re sanctions/dismissal for failure to file proof of service/default set for 6/29/16, is continued to 8/29/16, at 8:15 am in Dept. 22B, following review of plaintiff's Case Management Statement filed on 6/27/16.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2016

  • Judge

    Genalin Riley

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

WESLEY WHITELOCK ETC VS PACIFIC PLASTIC SURGERY ETC

Any party is welcome to file a case management statement prior to the conference. The case management statement should set out any new issues or information utilizing this Case Management Order as a form. Where the parties differ on what the Court should do the CMS should simply set out the position of any of the litigants. Please submit the CMS in Word format and not in PDF format.

  • Hearing

    Mar 30, 2011

WESLEY WHITELOCK ETC VS PACIFIC PLASTIC SURGERY ETC

Any party is welcome to file a case management statement prior to the conference; but it is not required. The case management statement should set out any new issues or information utilizing this Case Management Order as a form. Where the parties differ on what the Court should do, the CMS should simply set out the position of any of the litigants. Please submit the CMS in Word format and not in PDF format.

  • Hearing

    Jul 01, 2011

WESLEY WHITELOCK ETC VS PACIFIC PLASTIC SURGERY ETC

Any party is welcome to file a case management statement prior to the conference; but it is not required. The case management statement should set out any new issues or information utilizing this Case Management Order as a form. Where the parties differ on what the Court should do, the CMS should simply set out the position of any of the litigants. Please submit the CMS in Word format and not in PDF format.

  • Hearing

    Jul 01, 2011

WESLEY WHITELOCK ETC VS PACIFIC PLASTIC SURGERY ETC

Any party is welcome to file a case management statement prior to the conference; but it is not required. The case management statement should set out any new issues or information utilizing this Case Management Order as a form. Where the parties differ on what the Court should do the CMS should simply set out the position of any of the litigants. Please submit the CMS in Word format and not in PDF format.

  • Hearing

    Jun 03, 2011

DUANE CHAPMAN VS. RYAN EXLINE

The Mandatory CMC/OSC re sanctions/dismissal for failure to file proof of service/default set for 6/29/16, is continued to 8/29/16, at 8:15 am in Dept. 22B, following review of plaintiff's Case Management Statement filed on 6/27/16.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2016

  • Judge

    Genalin Riley

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

HELIOS HEALTHCARE LLC VS. KRISTY H KOZIOL ET AL

New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 11.055 According to Plaintiffs Case Management Statement, the Request for Default Judgment by Court was submitted to the court on 2/8/2008. This matter is being continued to allow time for the court to process Plaintiffs Request for Court Judgment.

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2008

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

TERRILL OSBORNE VS. MANOR CARE OF AMERICA, INC

This matter is continued to allow amended complaint to be filed per Case Management Statement. Plaintiff is to proceed expeditiously to get the case at issue, given the age of the matter. All answers/responsive pleadings or defaults to the amended complaint must be on file prior to the next Case Management Conference. New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 11.055

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2008

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

VICTORY PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS MARIACYNTHIA PUNO, ET AL.

At the Case Management Conference on August 4, 2020, Plaintiff had not filed its Proof of Service or Case Management Statement. Plaintiff’s counsel told the court that the “case fell through the cracks.” According to counsel, although defendant had been served on March 20, 2020, counsel had just filed his Proof of Service. Two months later, the Court held an OSC re Entry of Default Judgement. Plaintiff had failed to request default, and of course, had not filed its default judgment package.

  • Hearing

    Dec 16, 2020

STEVEN LEDESMA VS RIVER CITY PATIENT'S CENTER ET AL

No Case Management Statement is required for the 1/3/2008 hearing. Anyone requesting an appearance in regards to the tentative ruling will be scheduled for hearing on January 3, 2008 at 8:30 in Department 24.

  • Hearing

    Dec 24, 2007

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

ANN HILL VS APPLEWOOD CARE CENTER

Sanctions imposed for failure to file a Case Management Statement in a timely manner in accordance with Local Rule 11.055 (CMP)

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2008

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

CONNIE MARTINEZ VS. CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST

New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 11.055 Attorney Robert W Wasserman is directed to address the status of settlement in the Case Management Statement. Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter on the Case Management Calendar, all tentative rulings shall become the final ruling of the court.

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2012

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

ANGELA & CHRISTOPHER A WERTLEY V METHODIST HOSPITAL OF SAC

Sanctions imposed for failure to file Case Management Statement in a timely manner in accordance with Local Rule 11.055 (CMP). Case Management Conference - Case Management Program continued to 08/14/2008 at 08:30 AM in this department. New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 11.055 The Plaintiff shall diligently proceed to have all answers, defaults and/or dismissals of all defendants on file prior to the next hearing.

  • Hearing

    May 30, 2008

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

OLGA M ORCUTT VS BV GENERAL. INC.. ET AL.

Paige Shen in the amount of $150.00 for the late filing of the Case Management Statement filed on 2/8/2008 for the hearing on 2/15/2008. This matter is hereby continued to allow Ms. Shen to pay the imposed sanctions. Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Pay Sanctions - Case Management Program continued to 05/15/2008 at 08:30 AM in this department.

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2008

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

WALNUT WHITNEY CARE CENTER INC VS. JANICE L MCNEIL

New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 11.055 A judgment as described in the Case Management Statement is ordered to be submitted. Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter on the Case Management Calendar, all tentative rulings shall become the final ruling of the court. The tentative ruling, or such other ruling as the court may render, will not become the final ruling of the court until the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Apr 28, 2009

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Contract - Other

TIFFANY HENDERSON AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED VS. SUMMIT BHC SACRAMENTO LLC

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: CASE MANAGEMENT – COMPLEX The Court confirmed receipt of the Joint Case Management Statement filed on May 6, 2020 requesting a continuance. The Court granted motion. The Case Management Conference-Complex hearing is therefore continued to August 28, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. in this department. NOTICE As of the date of this minute order, all hearings will be conducted remotely through the court's Zoom application and live-streamed on the court's YouTube channel.

  • Hearing

    Jun 19, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

INTERIM PHYSICIANS LLC VS. INTERIM HEALTHCARE STAFFING OF NOTHERN CALIFORNIA INC

The Plaintiff failed to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. Case Management Conference - Case Management Program continued to 10/27/2011 at 08:30 in this department. New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 11.055 Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter on the Case Management Calendar, all tentative rulings shall become the final ruling of the court.

  • Hearing

    Jul 05, 2011

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

WESLEY WHITELOCK VS PACIFIC PLASTIC SURGERY ET AL

Hereafter the Court will invite a “joint case management statement” to be filed by plaintiff prior to any CMC. Additionally, any party is welcome to file a case management statement at the same time. The joint case management statement should set out any new information utilizing this Case Management Order as a form. Where the parties differ on what the Court should do the CMS should simply set out the position of any of the litigants. Please submit the CMS in Word format and not in PDF format.

  • Hearing

    Feb 15, 2011

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EX REL VS. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP

No Case Management Statement is required.

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2014

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EX REL VS. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP

No Case Management Statement is required.

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2014

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EX REL VS. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP

No Case Management Statement is required.

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2014

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EX REL VS. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP

No Case Management Statement is required.

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2014

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EX REL VS. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP

No Case Management Statement is required.

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2014

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EX REL VS. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP

No Case Management Statement is required.

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2014

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.