A discharge in bankruptcy must involve a “debt” (see 11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(12)), the debt must not be excepted from discharge (see 11 U.S.C. Sec. 523), and the debtor must not be subject to denial of discharge (see 11 U.S.C. Secs. 727(a), 1141(d)). To be dischargeable in bankruptcy, a debt must involve a creditor’s right to payment by the debtor. Where a creditor has perfected a judgment lien by recording an abstract of judgment prior to the debtor's filing for bankruptcy, the lien survives the debtor's discharge, so long as it has not been avoided by the bankruptcy trustee. (Songer v. Cooney (1989) 214 Cal.App.3d 387, 391; see McCready v. Whorf (2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 478, 481 [debtor’s bankruptcy extinguished his personal liability on the judgment, but not creditor’s lien on debtor’s profits].)
11 U.S.C. Sec. 524 provides
11 U.S.C. Sec. 523(a)(3)(A) excepts from the bankruptcy discharge debts neither listed nor scheduled in time to permit timely filing of a proof of claim, unless such creditor had notice or actual knowledge of the case in time to timely file a claim.
The advisory committee note to Fed.R.Bank.P 4007 states: “Subdivision (b) does not contain a time limit for filing a complaint to determine the dischargeability of a type of debt listed as nondischargeable under § 523(a)(1), (3), (5), (7), (8), or (9). Jurisdiction over this issue on these debts is held concurrently by the bankruptcy court and any appropriate nonbankruptcy forum.” (Watson v. Shandell (In re Watson), 192 B.R. 739, 746 (Bankr. 9th Cir. Cal. 1996); Flores v. Kmart Corp. (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1316, 1325.)
An unscheduled debt can be discharged in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case. In a no asset, no claims bar date Chapter 7 case, an omitted debt that is of a type covered by 11 U.S.C. Sec. 523(a)(3)(A), is discharged pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727. (Beezley v. California Land Title Co. (1993) 994 F.2d 1433, 1434.)
“Generally, valid, perfected judicial liens which precede bankruptcy survive and are enforceable after bankruptcy.... The bankruptcy discharge does not prevent post-petition enforcement of valid liens. The secured creditor may proceed to enforce the lien, as an in rem action, and is not barred by the injunctive terms of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 524.” (In re Hermansen (B.C.D.C. Colo. 1988) 84 B.R. 729, 733.)
“In other words, a discharge in bankruptcy voids a judgment only to the extent of the debtor's personal liability.” (Songer v. Cooney (1989) 214 Cal.App.3d 387, 391.) “A discharge does not affect a judgment to the extent that it supports a lien perfected prior to bankruptcy.” (Id.) “As to such liens the judgment remains valid and enforceable after discharge.” (Id.)
“An exception to the general rule of survivability of liens arises where the debtor has obtained an order in the bankruptcy proceeding avoiding the lien.” (Id.)
Thus a debtor may avoid a judicial lien to the extent that it impairs an exemption. (11 U.S.C. Sec. 522(f).) For example, a judgment lien can be avoided to the extent of a homestead exemption. (See In re Hermansen, supra, 84 B.R. at 732-733.)
In addition a judgment is secured only to the value of the debtor's interest in the property, and to the extent that the judgment exceeds the value of the debtor's equity it is unsecured. (11 U.S.C. Sec. 506(a).) The debtor may request in bankruptcy that the unsecured portion of the judgment creditor's claim be disallowed (11 U.S.C. Sec. 502), and to the extent that the claim is disallowed the lien is void. (11 U.S.C. Sec. 506(d).)
If the proper procedures are followed, a judgment lien may survive bankruptcy to the extent of the debtor's equity in the property, if any, as determined in bankruptcy, less any exemption. The debtor will be entitled to any increase in equity which occurs after the discharge in bankruptcy. (Songer v. Cooney (1989) 214 Cal.App.3d 387, 391.)
On its face the complaint does not support a claim that it violates the Bankruptcy discharge. Additionally, on September 11, 2020, in a Bankruptcy Court Order not brought to the Court’s attention by Dorfman, the exact same claim – that filing this complaint violated May 15, 2020 Bankruptcy discharge-- was specifically rejected by the Bankruptcy Court that issued that discharge.
Jan 11, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
The Ninth Circuit went on to state: "A bankruptcy discharge thus protects the debtor from efforts to collect the debtor's discharged debt indirectly and outside of the bankruptcy proceedings: it does not however. absolve a non-debtor's liabilities for that same "such" debt." 961 F.3d at 1083. The Fifth Circuit specifically stated in Stanley v. Trinchard, 500 F. 3d 411, 418 (5th Cir.2007).
Jan 07, 2021
Personal Injury/ Tort
other
San Diego County, CA
The law is clear that a bankruptcy discharge forecloses liability against Defendants for this personal injury action, which was disclosed to the Bankruptcy Court and therefore discharged: The Bankruptcy Code provides that a discharge of a debtor (1) voids any judgment at any time obtained, to the extent that such judgment is a determination of the personal liability of the debtor with respect to any debt discharged . . . ; and (2) operates as an injunction against the commencement or continuation of an action
Dec 30, 2020
Personal Injury/ Tort
Auto
Los Angeles County, CA
Furthermore, it is not clear that Plaintiff’s bankruptcy discharge in Case No. 4:15-bk-43109 qualifies as an adverse determination. Regardless, he meets the five-case threshold without it.
Aug 31, 2020
Burch
Contra Costa County, CA
Defendant’s argument against the allegation of a bankruptcy discharge is persuasive. However, this only disposes part of the claim for quiet title. As to the remaining part of the COA (i.e.: Compl. ¿17), Defendant argues that Plaintiffs lack standing and failed to allege tender of the default. As to the standing argument, the argument assumes facts not alleged in the Complaint and not judicially noticeable.
Aug 17, 2020
Real Property
Quiet Title
Los Angeles County, CA
"'The bankruptcy discharge does not prevent post-petition enforcement of valid liens. The secured creditor may proceed to enforce the lien, as an in rem action, and is not barred by the injunctive terms of 11 U.S.C. § 524.'" (Songer v. Cooney (1989) 214 Cal.App.3d 387, 391 [Citation omitted].)
Aug 05, 2020
Contract
Breach
San Diego County, CA
"'The bankruptcy discharge does not prevent post-petition enforcement of valid liens. The secured creditor may proceed to enforce the lien, as an in rem action, and is not barred by the injunctive terms of 11 U.S.C. § 524.'" (Songer v. Cooney (1989) 214 Cal.App.3d 387, 391 [Citation omitted].)
Aug 05, 2020
Contract
Breach
San Diego County, CA
In addition, Plaintiff’s allegations relating to Defendants treatment of Plaintiff after her bankruptcy fail given that a Deed of Trust survives a bankruptcy discharge. (See In re Cortez (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1995) 191 B.R. 174.) Plaintiff fails to allege facts suggesting Defendants had knowledge of any of the purported misrepresentations they made. Plaintiff does not allege facts suggesting she relied on any alleged misrepresentations to her detriment.
Jul 27, 2020
Real Property
other
Los Angeles County, CA
Plaintiff filed her complaint against the employer shortly after she received her bankruptcy discharge, and the bankruptcy case was closed while the action was pending. The Second District found that the trial court was correct that plaintiff lacked standing to pursue her claims, as the causes of action were the property of the bankruptcy estate.
Jul 17, 2020
Personal Injury/ Tort
other
Los Angeles County, CA
“When a bankruptcy discharge is entered, it replaces the automatic stay with a permanent injunction against such judicial proceedings.” (Weakly-Hoyt v. Foster (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 928, 931, citations omitted; see also 11 U.S.C § 362(c)(2)(C).)
Jul 13, 2020
Real Property
other
Los Angeles County, CA
“When a bankruptcy discharge is entered, it replaces the automatic stay with a permanent injunction against such judicial proceedings.” (Weakly-Hoyt v. Foster (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 928, 931, citations omitted; see also 11 U.S.C § 362(c)(2)(C).)
Jul 13, 2020
Real Property
other
Los Angeles County, CA
A bankruptcy discharge "operates as an injunction against the commencement or continuation of an action, the employment of process, or an act, to collect, recover or offset any debt [subject to such discharge] as a personal liability of the debtor, whether or not discharge of such debt is waived." 11 U.S.C. § 524(a)(2).
Feb 18, 2020
San Joaquin County, CA
· Exhibit 3: Notice of Entry of Bankruptcy Discharge Injunction and Termination of Levine’s Automatic Litigation Stay, filed in Sylvester Stewart v. Gerald Goldstein, et al., LASC Case No: BC430809, filed on October 17, 2017. · Exhibit 4: Request for Dismissal of Defendant Claire Levine, filed in Sylvester Stewart v. Gerald Goldstein, et al., LASC Case No: BC430809, signed by the court on February 26, 2018. The Court GRANTS Defendant’s request for judicial notice. (Evid. Code § 452, subd. (d).) C.
Feb 06, 2020
Personal Injury/ Tort
other
Los Angeles County, CA
A bankruptcy discharge "operates as an injunction against the commencement or continuation of an action, the employment of process, or an act, to collect, recover or offset any debt [subject to such discharge] as a personal liability of the debtor, whether or not discharge of such debt is waived." 11 U.S.C. § 524(a)(2).
Feb 04, 2020
San Joaquin County, CA
(2) Bankruptcy As an alternative basis for the invalidity of the Ohio judgment, iCRco asserts that its bankruptcy discharge invalidated Ault LLC’s claim.
Jan 22, 2020
Santa Barbara County, CA
Plaintiff’s attorney declares that the dismissal was mistakenly made as to the entire case, when the purpose was solely to dismiss DDC following its bankruptcy discharge. (Motion, Thai Decl., ¶¶2-4.) In opposition, CCD submits only a declaration by its counsel, who improperly opines that Plaintiff’s attorney’s error is insufficient to warrant relief. The Court admonishes CCD that any opposition to the Motion must comply with the requirements of Cal.
Jan 16, 2020
James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo
Los Angeles County, CA
.); (7) this is a change in circumstances of which Plaintiff is fully aware; and (8) she has received a bankruptcy discharge for any damages Plaintiff could claim to have against her arising from her alleged taking of property as found in the Interlocutory Judgment. (Id.) Analysis “The facts essential to jurisdiction for a contempt proceeding are (1) the making of the order; (2) knowledge of the order; (3) ability of the respondent to render compliance, [and] (4) wilful disobedience of the order.”
Dec 27, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
On the merits, the Court finds that the new allegations of the SAC fail to sufficiently correct the deficiencies previously noted in this Court’s August 16, 2019 minute order sustaining the demurrer to the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), including the bar of the statute of limitations, as well as the judicial estoppel and res judicata bars flowing from plaintiff’s bankruptcy, bankruptcy proceedings and filings, and bankruptcy discharge.
Dec 12, 2019
Real Property
other
Los Angeles County, CA
· Exhibit 3: Notice of Entry of Bankruptcy Discharge Injunction and Termination of Levine’s Automatic Litigation Stay, filed in Sylvester Stewart v. Gerald Goldstein, et al., LASC Case No: BC430809, filed on October 17, 2017. · Exhibit 4: Request for Dismissal of Defendant Claire Levine, filed in Sylvester Stewart v. Gerald Goldstein, et al., LASC Case No: BC430809, signed by the court on February 26, 2018.
Nov 08, 2019
Personal Injury/ Tort
other
Los Angeles County, CA
First, because bankruptcy discharge is a defense equally applicable to every member of the class, Segui is not atypical. OMRM’s Chapter 11 plan was confirmed on December 14, 2016, and the class period only runs to December 16, 2016. The class, as defined, appears to consist entirely of persons whose claims against OMRM arguably were discharged in bankruptcy. The bankruptcy discharge defense can be adjudicated on a classwide basis.
Oct 25, 2019
Orange County, CA
However, because SLS was not required to send him monthly statements due to the bankruptcy discharge, it and the Loan owner did not waive their right to foreclose on the Property. Therefore, Plaintiff’s claim that SLS cannot foreclose or collect six years of Loan interest from the foreclosure sale proceeds fails. (See, Cavalry SPV I, LLC v. Watkins (2019) 36 Cal.App.5th 1070, 1088.)
Oct 18, 2019
San Joaquin County, CA
The SAC adds four causes of action: intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, violation of bankruptcy discharge injunctions, and unfair competition. (Harris v. Wachovia Mortg. (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1018, 1023; see Community Water Coalition v. Santa Cruz County Local Agency Formation Com. (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 1317, 1329.) Fifth Cause of Action (Wrongful Foreclosure). The demurrer to the fifth cause of action is sustained without leave to amend.
Sep 16, 2019
Orange County, CA
At this time, Defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings, contending he recently received a bankruptcy discharge that includes Plaintiff’s claims in this suit. Defendant provides judicially noticeable evidence that he received a discharge of all of his debts, including those at issue in this lawsuit, on 5/21/18. Defendant timely and properly served the motion on Plaintiff. Any opposition to the motion was due on or before 9/03/19. Plaintiff has not filed opposition to the motion.
Sep 16, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Mason argues that because Grover was named in Mason's bankruptcy proceeding, the bankruptcy discharge injunction prohibits any further action against Mason. Grover says the injunction does not apply to fraud and negligent misrepresentation. Thus, Grover impliedly concedes that the injunction applies to the new claims. Finally, Grover expressly acknowledges that further discovery and all new dates will be needed if the motion is granted. This case has already been pending for more than two years.
Aug 15, 2019
Personal Injury/ Tort
other
San Diego County, CA
While the Court may ultimately find these facts untrue, Defendant has established a triable issue of fact i.e. a contract, agreement, partnership or joint venture that arose after the bankruptcy discharge. Any such contract, agreement, partnership or joint venture would not be the subject of res judicata. Defendant also briefly makes an argument that the failure to disclose the contract, and partnership/joint venture results in those items being left in the bankruptcy estate.
Aug 05, 2019
Shasta County, CA
Please wait a moment while we load this page.