What is an Assignment of Judgment?

Useful Rulings on Assignment of Judgment

Recent Rulings on Assignment of Judgment

PENTECH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. VS RENE MEDINA

On March 14, 2018, an “Acknowledgment of Assignment of Judgment Filed on April 20, 2009” was filed in the Underlying Action, which reflected that the April 20, 2009 judgment had been assigned on March 6, 2018 to WVJP 2017-2, LP (“WVJP”). (Id., ¶4, Exh. 2.) On July 31, 2018, WVJP filed an “Application for and Renewal of Judgment.” (Id., ¶5, Exh. 3.) On June 20, 2011, an abstract of judgment was issued; it was filed and recorded on August 3, 2011, with the Recorder’s Office for Los Angeles County.

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

WRITERS GUILD OF AMERICA WEST INC VS CITIZEN JANE PRODUCTION

On December 2, 2013, Judgment Creditor WGAW filed an acknowledgment of assignment of judgment, assigning its right, title, and interest in the judgment to James Dalessandro. (12/02/13 Acknowledgment of Assignment of Judgment.) On July 14, 2014, the Court denied without prejudice the motion to amend judgment to include LLC managers (alter ego) and related company as judgment debtors. (07/14/14 Minute Order.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

VAZGEN MIRZAKHANYAN VS JV & T CAPITAL LLC ET AL

On July 18, 2019, Creditor Assignee Volodya Adanyan filed a notice of assignment of judgment, stating that Plaintiff assigned his interest in the within Judgment to Creditor Assignee Volodya Adanyan. On September 4, 2019, a writ of execution was issued where Volodya Adanyan is the assignee of record and the judgment debtor is Monika M. Setyan. On November 1, 2019, the Court granted Defendant Monika M. Setyan’s motion to set aside/vacate judgment. On March 20, 2020, Defendant Monika M.

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

VAZGEN MIRZAKHANYAN VS JV & T CAPITAL LLC ET AL

On July 18, 2019, Creditor Assignee Volodya Adanyan filed a notice of assignment of judgment, stating that Plaintiff assigned his interest in the within Judgment to Creditor Assignee Volodya Adanyan. On September 4, 2019, a writ of execution was issued where Volodya Adanyan is the assignee of record and the judgment debtor is Monika M. Setyan. On November 1, 2019, the Court granted Defendant Monika M. Setyan’s motion to set aside/vacate judgment. On April 8, 2020, Julie C.

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

A copy of the Acknowledgment of Assignment of Judgment, filed on September 13, 2019, declares that no money has been paid towards the judgment as of August 29, 2019. (Motion, Exh. A1.) The Motion is also supported by evidence of Judgment Debtor’s interest in the aforementioned entities. (Id. at Exhs. B1-B4.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

(“Assignee of Record”) filed an Assignment of Judgment demonstrating Judgment Creditor assigned it all rights to the Judgment. (6/3/11 Assignment of Judgment.) On March 18, 2019, Assignee of Record filed an application to renew the judgment. (Mot., Scalia Decl., ¶ 5, Exh. C.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 01, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

On November 5, 2018, Plaintiff filed an Acknowledgement of Assignment of Judgment (the “Assignment”) demonstrating Plaintiff assigned its Judgment to Judgment Assignee Upstream Capital Investments, LLC (“Upstream”). (11/5/18 Assignment of Judgment.) An Order to Appear for Examination was issued for April 23, 2020, but was continued to January 15, 2021 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic court closures.

  • Hearing

    Jul 01, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

YORAM YEHUDA ET AL VS ARTURO RUBINSTEIN ET AL

Request for Judicial Notice Third-Party Parviz Fakheri requests judicial notice of (1) Plaintiff’s acknowledgment of assignment of judgment filed in this case, (2) the judgment entered in Case No. BC630004, Arturo Rubenstein v. Paris P. Fakheri, (3) the memorandum of costs (summary) filed in Case No. BC630004, (4) a minute order granting a motion to tax costs in Case No.

  • Hearing

    Mar 11, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

WILSON, FRANK ET AL VS DELTA HOMES, INC. ET AL

Wilson’s motion to revoke the acknowledgment of assignment of judgment of the assignee of record, Attorney Collection Service, Inc., and to revert all rights, title, and interest to the judgment to Lonnie Wilson. On November 10, 2016, Lonnie Wilson filed an application for and renewal of judgment for $721,519. The judgment was renewed. On March 2017, the court denied a similar motion as the one that was denied on February 25, 2015.

  • Hearing

    Mar 03, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

PENTECH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. VS RENE MEDINA

On March 14, 2018, an “Acknowledgment of Assignment of Judgment Filed on April 20, 2009” was filed in the Underlying Action, which reflected that the April 20, 2009 judgment had been assigned on March 6, 2018 to WVJP 2017-2, LP (“WVJP”). (Id., ¶4, Exh. 2.) On July 31, 2018, WVJP filed an “Application for and Renewal of Judgment.” (Id., ¶5, Exh. 3.) On June 20, 2011, an abstract of judgment was issued; it was filed and recorded on August 3, 2011, with the Recorder’s Office for Los Angeles County.

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2020

PENTECH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. VS RENE MEDINA

On March 14, 2018, an “Acknowledgment of Assignment of Judgment Filed on April 20, 2009” was filed in the Underlying Action, which reflected that the April 20, 2009 judgment had been assigned on March 6, 2018 to WVJP 2017-2, LP (“WVJP”). (Id., ¶4, Exh. 2.) On July 31, 2018, WVJP filed an “Application for and Renewal of Judgment.” (Id., ¶5, Exh. 3.) On June 20, 2011, an abstract of judgment was issued; it was filed and recorded on August 3, 2011, with the Recorder’s Office for Los Angeles County.

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Discussion Sarcor submits a copy of an Assignment of Judgment (the “Assignment”), which purports to demonstrate Judgment Creditor’s April 19, 2011 assignment of the Judgment. (Mot., Jones Decl., ¶ 3, Exh. A.) However, although the Assignment lists Judgment Debtor’s name and the correct case number, it states that Columbia Credit Services, Inc. (“Columbia”) is the assignor. (Id.) The Court record does not contain an assignment from Judgment Creditor to Columbia.

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

On January 22, 2019, Sacor Financial (“Sacor”) sought to file an Acknowledgment of Assignment of Judgment and Application for Renewal of Judgment (“Acknowledgement and Application”). (Motion, Scalia Decl., ¶4.) The filings were rejected due to errors regarding Sacor’s name and address. (Notice of Rejection, dated 1/24/19.) Sacor did not receive notice of the rejection until January 24, 2019. (Motion, Scalia Decl., ¶4.)

  • Hearing

    Feb 19, 2020

BANK OF THE WEST, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS ROY CARRERA

On January 21, 2015, an assignment of judgment was filed, indicating that the right to collect the judgment has been assigned from Bank of the West to Baseline Financial Services. Assignee Baseline Financial Services seeks approval of its costs and attorney’s fees. TENTATIVE RULING: Assignee Baseline Financial Services’ motion for order for approval of costs and attorney fees is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

(“Sarcor”) submitted an Assignment of Judgment, Application for and Renewal of Judgment, Memorandum of Costs After Judgment, and Notice of Renewal of Judgment (the “Renewal Package”). (Scalia Decl., ¶ 3, Exh. A.) On February 26, 2019, the Clerk sent a Notice of Rejection of Sarcor’s Application because the case numbered was incorrectly entered as “08CS531” instead of “08C05321.” (2/26/19 Notice of Rejection.) On March 1, 2019, Sarcor submitted a corrected Renewal Package. (Scalia Decl., ¶ 5, Exh. C.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

PRIDE ACQUISTIIONS, LLC VS EVERETT Y PUNZALAN

On November 25, 2018, an “Acknowledgment of Assignment of Judgment” was filed, which reflected that Plaintiff assigned the judgment to Unifund CCR, LLC. On September 13, 2019, a writ of execution was issued. Discussion Plaintiff’s Assignor/Judgment Creditor Unifund CCR, LLC (“Judgment Creditor”) opposes the Claim of Exemption submitted by Defendant/Judgment Debtor Everett Y. Punzalan (“Judgment Debtor”).

  • Hearing

    Dec 19, 2019

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

On April 9, 2009, Plaintiff filed an Assignment of Judgment, whereby Plaintiff assigned its right to the default judgment to Judgment Assignee BV Financial Management, LLC (“Judgment Assignee”). The default judgment was twice renewed on April 9, 2009 and October 12, 2018. On April 29, 2019, Defendant filed a Motion to Vacate Default and Default Judgment (the “Original Motion”) under Code of Civil Procedure sections 473(b), 473(d), and 473.5 and Civil Code section 1788.61.

  • Hearing

    Dec 17, 2019

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JENKINS PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT VS JONES, TANICA N.

(“Traco”) filed an Acknowledgment of Assignment of Judgment on October 17, 2017 stating that Traco was assigning the judgment to Bradford Brown (“Brown”). On November 21, 2019, Traco filed another Acknowledge of Assingment of Judgment stating that Brown reassigned the judgment agaisnt Judgment Debtor to Traco. Judgment Debtor filed the instant Motion to Vacate Default and Default Judgment (the “Motion”) on September 4, 2019, but there is no proof of service attached to the moving papers.

  • Hearing

    Dec 12, 2019

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

UMINA V. LUMINA

. - Assignment of Judgment Judgment Debtor Leonard Umina asserts that the assignment is invalid, because it only assigns a void abstract of judgment and not the 2008 judgment; and the assignment does not state the cause of action. “(a) An assignee of a right represented by a judgment may become an assignee of record by filing with the clerk of the court which entered the judgment an acknowledgment of assignment of judgment.” (Code of Civil Procedure, § 673(a).)

  • Hearing

    Dec 06, 2019

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

On July 7, 2008, Petitioner filed a Notice of Assignment of Judgment to Hillco Receivables, LLC (“Hillco”). On September 26, 2016, Hillco filed an Application for and Renewal of Judgment. On October 26, 2017, the Court granted the motion of Hillco’s assignee, Sacor Financial, Inc. (“Sacor”), to renew the judgment. Notice of the Renewal of Judgment was issued by the Court on August 10, 2018. Thereafter, Notice of Renewal of Judgment was served by Sacor to non-party Luanne Bean.

  • Hearing

    Dec 05, 2019

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Propriety of Assignment of Judgment to Annex Financial, Inc. Shawn also contends that Annex Financial was not an assignee of record with the power to renew the judgment. “An assignee of a judgment is not entitled to enforce the judgment under this title unless an acknowledgment of assignment of judgment to that assignee has been filed under Section 673 or the assignee has otherwise become an assignee of record.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 681.020.)

  • Hearing

    Nov 18, 2019

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

PICKFORD FUND, LLC VS MASOUD ISAAC KAHROBAIE, ET AL

Masoud seeks declaratory relief, asking the court to issue the following declarations: - That the Nevada judgment in favor of City National Bank has been extinguished - City National Bank’s assignment of judgment does not authorize Pickford to proceed with its fraudulent transfer or common-law fraud claims Cross-defendants demur to both causes of action and seeks to strike the request for attorney’s fees.

  • Hearing

    Nov 13, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

NDS LLC VS REY CRUZ

(Assignment of Judgment, filed 8-26-19.) No amount of the judgment has been paid and the current balance due on the judgment is $32,473.15, plus interest at the rate of 10% per annum from and after July 26, 2012, which equates to approximately $8.89 per day until the judgment is paid in full. (Schulman Dec., ¶4.)

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2019

DAN FLOIT VS. WILLIAM CHAPMAN

(Cash Declaration) As required by B&P § 10479, the Chapmans assigned all rights and interests in the original judgment to DRE by executing an acknowledgement of assignment of judgment on August 24, 2015. An Abstract of Judgment was issued on August 25, 2015. The Abstract of Judgment was recorded on September 14, 2015. (Cash Declaration) Total amount of judgment is $883,294.55. Andre is listed as an additional judgment debtor owing $4400 and costs against all defendants of $20,294.55.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2019

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

DAN FLOIT VS. WILLIAM CHAPMAN

(Cash Declaration) As required by B&P § 10479, the Chapmans assigned all rights and interests in the original judgment to DRE by executing an acknowledgement of assignment of judgment on August 24, 2015. An Abstract of Judgment was issued on August 25, 2015. The Abstract of Judgment was recorded on September 14, 2015. (Cash Declaration) Total amount of judgment is $883,294.55. Andre is listed as an additional judgment debtor owing $4400 and costs against all defendants of $20,294.55.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2019

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

1 2 3 4 5     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.