How to Appoint Guardian Ad Litem?

Useful Rulings on Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem

Recent Rulings on Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem

NORBERTO LEZA III VS NAYELY CASTRELLON

However, the Court does not have a granted order for appointment of guardian ad litem on file. There are only two rejected applications in the record. Also, there is no proposed order approving compromise of disputed claim (Judicial Council Form MC-351) or order to deposit money into blocked account (Judicial Council Form MC-355). The unopposed Petition to approve minor’s compromise is GRANTED on the condition that Petitioner lodges these orders and brings copies of these orders to the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

MARTINEZ-MEDINA V. EL DORADO TRANSIT AUTHORITY

Application for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem. A minor and the minor’s parent have filed an action against defendant for general negligence, property damage and personal injuries they allegedly sustained in a motor vehicle accident. The minor’s parent filed an application for appointment as the minor’s guardian ad litem. The matter was set for a noticed hearing.

  • Hearing

    Jun 15, 2020

ABRAHAM DE JESUS SOLANO CHICAS V. W.A. RASIC CONSTRUCTION INC REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM

The request on behalf of the minor, Said Solano, for the appointment of his father and co- plaintiff, Abraham De Jesus Solano Chicas, as his guardian ad litem will be denied in the absence of additional information. Analysis: The minor’s first request for the appointment of his father as his GAL was denied on March 18, 2020, for two reasons, includ...

  • Hearing

    Jun 10, 2020

LOWRY V. LOWRY

Defendants’ motion to vacate appointment of guardian ad litem and remove guardian ad litem is granted. Rena Lowry is ordered removed as William Lowry’s guardian ad litem. The court sets a hearing re: appointment of the public guardian as guardian ad litem for William Lowry in this action at 8:30 a.m. on Friday, July 17, 2020, in Department Nine. TENTATIVE RULING # 1: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO VACATE APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM AND REMOVE GUARDIAN AD LITEM IS GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Jun 05, 2020

MARTINEZ-MEDINA V. EL DORADO TRANSIT AUTHORITY

Application for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem. A minor and the minor’s parent have filed an action against defendant for general negligence, property damage and personal injuries they allegedly sustained in a motor vehicle accident. The minor’s parent filed an application for appointment as the minor’s guardian ad litem. The matter was set for a noticed hearing.

  • Hearing

    May 22, 2020

JAZLYNN AMARI MORAN, ET AL. VS GARFIELD MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL.

DISCUSSION Request for Judicial Notice Plaintiff requests that the Court take judicial notice of the filings and pleadings in the instant action, including the application for appointment of guardian ad litem. (RJN, p. 2.) The Court notes that, going forward, such a request is not necessary as the pleadings and application are already part of the record. Pursuant to Evidence Code section 452, subdivision (d), the request is GRANTED. Motion for Trial Preference Plaintiff is one year old. (Mot., p. 3-4.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 17, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

WILSON V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS

On July 24, 2019, the court rejected Plaintiff’s application and order for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem on behalf of ELI ANTHONY WILSON on the basis that ELI ANTHONY WILSON was not a named party to the action and that the complaint would need to be amended to add him as a party. The application included the demand for arbitration submitted to Kaiser on behalf of ELI. 8.

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2020

RE: PET’N FOR PROB OF ORIG WILL LETTERS TESTAMENTARY

Proposed Order Note: Exparte petition and order for appointment of guardian ad litem filed 2-3-20. Court cannot appoint a G.A.L without a noticed hearing and a finding of incapacity LUCILLE A BIONDI JULIE FIEDLER NICHOLAS A BIONDI

  • Hearing

    Mar 10, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

URBINA KARMEN, ET AL. VS PAUL AZZI, AS AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

On February 18, 2020, Petitioner’s Application for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem of Claimant was approved. Legal Standard & Discussion Court approval is required for all settlements of a minor’s claim. (See Prob. Code, §§ 3500, 3600, et seq.; Code Civ. Proc., § 372.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ALEXANDER MORALES, ET AL. VS VERONICA WALKER, ET AL.

The hearing on this petition was continued twice to permit Petitioner submit an Application for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem. The Court’s file does not reflect that Petitioner complied with the order. Therefore, the settlement cannot be approved at this time. The hearing is continued to April 2, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. in Department SS-29. If it has not already been submitted, Petitioner is ordered to submit an Application for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem forthwith for signature.

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2020

KAVIUS HARRIS VS GARY SMITH, ET AL.

Los Angeles Superior Court Local Rule 2.8(e) requires motions for appointment of guardian ad litem to be presented to Department 25/26 of the LA Superior Court, Spring Street Courthouse (formerly Dept. 94 of the Stanley Mosk Courthouse). The Court finds this motion, which styled a motion for leave to amend, is really a motion to appoint a court-ordered GAL, and therefore must also be directed to Department 25/26. The motion is denied.

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2020

BRANDON LOPRETE VS NEWHALL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL.

The court notes there is a discrepancy between the complaint, which identifies the minor Plaintiff as “Brandon Loprete,” and the Application for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem, which identifies the Plaintiff as “Braden Loprete.” On the court’s motion, the name of the minor Plaintiff is amended to reflect true name of the minor as “Braden Loprete”, as reflected in the medical records. Cal Code Civil Procedure § 473(a)(1).

  • Hearing

    Feb 07, 2020

MONRADA PHANBUNKOET ET AL VS CHRIS ESTUARDO MELGAR

The Court’s file reflects that Applications for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem for both claimants were submitted on 1/23/2020 but have not yet been approved. Accordingly, the court continues the hearing to 2/28/2020 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 29 in the Spring Street Courthouse. Counsel is ordered to cure the defect as set forth above prior to the hearing date.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2020

ALEXANDER MORALES, ET AL. VS VERONICA WALKER, ET AL.

The hearing on this petition was continued twice to permit Petitioner submit an Application for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem. The Court’s file does not reflect that Petitioner complied with the order. Therefore, the settlement cannot be approved at this time.

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2020

MATTER OF THE BOWERMAN FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST

RE: PET’N FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM FILED ON 10/04/19 BY JANICE BOWERMAN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Proposed order PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved Proposed Order Submitted No Appearance Required GARY M BARBAGELATA RAY M BARBAGELATA ROBERT G BONOVICH

  • Hearing

    Dec 12, 2019

KLIMAS VS KLIMAS

Defendants' motion to vacate the appointment of guardian ad litem is denied. Defendants have not established that the guardian ad litem appointed for Plaintiff Esther Joy Klimas has interests that are adverse to Plaintiff's interests in this litigation. Moreover, the Court is not persuaded that Plaintiff was required to give her consent to the appointment of a guardian ad litem.

  • Hearing

    Dec 12, 2019

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

MARIA LOPEZ-TRUJILLO ET AL VS RENAE MARTICORENA

On 10/10/19, the Court rejected all requests for appointment of guardian ad litem. Petitioner has not filed new requests for appointment of guardian ad litem at this time. The Court will not consider the petitions until appointment of a guardian ad litem is finalized. Petitioner must re-file the petitions and set them for a new hearing date upon appointment of a guardian ad litem. The Court notes that this case was filed on 12/12/14, and the five-year dismissal statute is set to run on 12/12/19.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2019

ALEXANDER MORALES, ET AL. VS VERONICA WALKER, ET AL.

However, the court’s file does not reflect that Petitioner submitted an Application for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem. Therefore, the settlement cannot be approved at this time. The hearing is continued to Tuesday, December 23, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. in Department SS-2. Petition is ordered to submit an Application for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem forthwith for signature. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 26, 2019

IN THE MATTER OF CHAD MICHAEL PEEK

The Court intends to grant the ex parte Petition for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem and appoint Christopher Young as Guardian ad Litem of Luke Peek.

  • Hearing

    Nov 15, 2019

JOSHUA DAVIS HUBBARD ET AL VS BROCK DAVIS RIDENOUR ET AL

The court’s file reflects that counsel submitted an Application for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem on 10/30/19, which has not yet been signed. The court continues the hearing to 12/17/19 to permit the application to be processed.

  • Hearing

    Nov 12, 2019

JOSHUA DAVIS HUBBARD ET AL VS BROCK DAVIS RIDENOUR ET AL

The court’s file reflects that counsel submitted an Application for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem on 10/30/19, which has not yet been signed. The court continues the hearing to 12/18/19 to permit the application to be processed. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 12, 2019

PATRICK IGNACIO VS POMONA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL

No new papers have been filed other than rejected applications for appointment of guardian ad litem for Patrick Ignacio. Thus, the same defects that were previously addressed in the Court’s January 17, 2019 Order still stand. The defects are as follows: A proposed order must be attached for review. The proposed order must attach a copy of the proposed special needs trust instrument to capture the text of the trust being approved.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

IN RE MATTER OF THE MULLER FAMILY TRUST

Discuss appointment of guardian ad litem for Evelyn Muller prior to approval of settlement agreement. Approve settlement agreement.

  • Hearing

    Oct 09, 2019

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

ANI VARDPARONYAN, ET AL. VS CLARICE NERCESE, ET AL.

Plaintiffs explain that the Complaint was filed timely on February 12, 2019 but counsel failed to submit an application and order for appointment of guardian ad litem concurrently with the complaint, which caused the Court’s newly-implemented e-filing system caused the system to reject the filing. (Declaration of Robert J. Golde, ¶ 2.) Plaintiffs’ motion for order correcting the filing date from February 19, 2019 to February 12, 2019 is pending and set for hearing on November 18, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Oct 09, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

BARBARA GIESE VS MATTYE FEGAN-PERRY

A Hearing—Other for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem is set for October 17, 2019. The Final Status Conference is set for August 31, 2020. Trial is set for September 8, 2020. 1.

  • Hearing

    Oct 04, 2019

1 2 3 4 5 6 7     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.