Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling in California

What Is an Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling?

Legal Standard

Code of Civil Procedure § 704.740 says ‘a dwelling may not be sold to enforce a money judgment ‘except pursuant to a court order for sale obtained under this article ....’ (Code of Civil Procedure § 704.740(a).) The ‘article’ referred to is article 4, “Homestead Exemption,” Code of Civil Procedure §§ 704.710 through 704.850.” (Wells Fargo Financial Leasing, Inc. v. D & M Cabinets (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 59, 67.)

Code of Civil Procedure §704.740 is part of the homestead laws. ‘Homestead laws are designed to protect the sanctity of the family home against a loss caused by a forced sale by creditors.... The homestead exemption ensures that insolvent debtors and their families are not rendered homeless by virtue of an involuntary sale of the residential property they occupy. Thus, the homestead law is not designed to protect creditors .... This strong public policy requires courts to adopt a liberal construction of the law and facts to promote the beneficial purposes of the homestead legislation to benefit the debtor [and his family].’” (Id. at 67–68.)

Court Order for Sale

A Court Order for sale obtained under Code of Civil Procedure § 704.710 et seq. is required before the interest of a natural person in a dwelling may be sold to enforce a money judgment.

The creditor's application for an order for sale must be made under oath and must describe the dwelling. (Code of Civil Procedure § 704.760.) Further, the application must include all the following:

  1. A statement whether or not the records of the county tax assessor indicate a current homeowner's exemption or disabled veteran's exemption for the dwelling and the person or persons claiming the exemption. (Code of Civil Procedure § 704.760(a).)
  2. A statement, which may be based on information and belief, whether the dwelling is the homestead and the amount of any homestead exemption, and a statement whether or not the records of the county recorder indicate that the judgment debtor or the debtor's spouse has recorded a homestead declaration under Code of Civil Procedure 704.910 et seq. (Code of Civil Procedure § 704.760(b).)
  3. A statement of the amount of any liens or encumbrances on the dwelling and the names and addresses of persons holding those liens or encumbrances. (Code of Civil Procedure § 704.760(c).)

(See Little v. Community Bank (1991) 234 C.A.3d 355, 359).

Time and Notice of Hearing

After a Judgment Creditor files an application for an order for sale of a dwelling, the Court must set a time and place for hearing and order the Judgment Debtor to show cause why an order for sale should not be made. The hearing must be scheduled no later than 45 days after the application is filed, unless the time is extended for good cause. (Code of Civil Procedure § 704.770(a); see also In re Marriage of Schenck (1991) 228 C.A.3d 1474, 1481.) Not later than 30 days before the hearing date, the Creditor must serve the Debtor, personally OR by mail, with a copy of the show cause order, a copy of the application, and a copy of the notice of hearing in the form prescribed by the Judicial Council, and must personally serve an occupant of the dwelling with a copy of each of those documents. If there is no occupant present at the time service is attempted, the Creditor must post a copy of each of the documents in a conspicuous place at the dwelling. (Code of Civil Procedure § 704.770(b).)

Determination and Order

If the county tax assessor's records indicate the existence of a current homeowner's exemption or disabled veteran's exemption on the dwelling claimed by the Judgment Debtor or the Debtor's spouse, the Judgment Creditor has the burden of proof that the dwelling is not a homestead. If the records indicate that there is not a current homeowner's exemption or a disabled veteran's exemption, the burden of proof that the dwelling is a homestead is on the person claiming a homestead. Where the application states the amount of the homestead exemption, the person claiming the exemption has the burden of proving that the amount of the exemption is other than the amount stated in the application. (Code of Civil Procedure § 704.780(a).)

The Court must determine if the dwelling is exempt and, if so, it must determine the amount of the exemption and the fair market value of the dwelling. (Code of Civil Procedure § 704.780(b).) To assist in determining the fair market value of the dwelling, the court may appoint a qualified appraiser and determine reasonable compensation for the appraisal. (Code of Civil Procedure § 704.780(d).) As originally enacted, Code of Civil Procedure § 704.780(b) simply provided that the court must make an order for sale of the dwelling. In Abbett Elec. Corp. v. Storek (1994) 22 C.A.4th 1460, 1470, the Court held that this provision imposed a mandatory duty on the trial court to issue an order for sale on the determination that a dwelling is exempt, regardless of the Court's determination of the dwelling's value. In response to Abbett, the statute was amended to provide that an order for sale must be made unless the court determines that the sale would not be likely to produce a bid sufficient to satisfy any part of the amount due on the judgment under the minimum bid requirements of Code of Civil Procedure § 704.800. (Id. citing Code of Civil Procedure § 704.780(b).)

The order must specify the amount of the proceeds of the sale to be distributed to each person having a lien or encumbrance on the dwelling, and the names and addresses of those persons. Except as otherwise provided by Code of Civil Procedure § 704.710 et seq., the Sale is governed by the general procedure governing execution sales (Code of Civil Procedure § 701.510 et seq.). If the Court determines that the dwelling is not exempt, it must order a Sale in the manner provided by Code of Civil Procedure § 701.510 et seq. (Code of Civil Procedure § 704.780(b).) However, despite this mandatory language, the Court may refuse to issue an order of Sale for a nonexempt dwelling if to do so will interfere with the family law department's continuing jurisdiction over division of community property interests in the dwelling. (In re Marriage of Schenck (1991) 228 C.A.3d 1474, 1482.) The Court Clerk must transmit a certified copy of the order to the levying officer and, if the Court making the order is not the Court in which the judgment was entered, to the clerk of the Court in which the judgment was entered. (Code of Civil Procedure § 704.780(c).)

Amount of Homestead Exemption

The exemption amount in effect at the time a judgment creditor obtains a lien shall apply to enforcement of that lien, notwithstanding later amendments to the exemption amounts set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 704.730. Code of Civil Procedure § 704.965. (Berhanu v. Metzger, 12 Cal.App.4th 445, 448 (1992) “[A] judgment lien on real property is created... by recording an abstract of a money judgment with the county recorder.”; see also Code of Civil Procedure § 697.310.)

Rulings for Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling in California

(Application for Issuance of (1) Order for Sale of Dwelling and (2) Order to Show Cause Why Order for Sale of Dwelling Should Not Be Made, p. 8:12-13.) Plaintiff’s application for issuance of order of for sale of dwelling states that the Los Angeles County Tax Assessor’s records “do not indicate a disabled veteran’s exemption for the Property. (Application for Issuance of (1) Order for Sale of Dwelling and (2) Order to Show Cause Why Order for Sale of Dwelling Should Not Be Made, p.9:6-7.)

  • Name

    TRENT CORNELL VS JOHN DAVID CARRIVEAU, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    20STCP03582

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2021

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

.: BC636675 Hearing Date: November 7, 2018 [TENTATIVE] order RE: PLAINTFF’S APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING AND ISSUANCE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING SHOULD NOT BE MADE Plaintiff Eileen Bonillas’s application for order for sale of dwelling and issuance of order to show cause why order for sale of dwelling should not be made is placed off calendar.

  • Name

    EILEEN BONILLAS VS ALFRED PALAFOX ROMO

  • Case No.

    BC636675

  • Hearing

    Nov 07, 2018

Therefore, the Court will consider the application for order for sale of dwelling, set for hearing on January 4, 2021.

  • Name

    TRENT CORNELL VS JOHN DAVID CARRIVEAU, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    20STCP03582

  • Hearing

    Dec 14, 2020

APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING SHOULD NOT ISSUE (CCP §§ 704.750 et seq.)

  • Name

    ABLE RESTORATION, INC. VS KEVIN LONG

  • Case No.

    17STLC02876

  • Hearing

    Feb 14, 2023

  • Judge

    Echo Dawn Ryan

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

Case Number: 18STLC02866 Hearing Date: April 19, 2022 Dept: 26 APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING (CCP §§ 704.760 and 704.780) TENTATIVE RULING: Hearing on Plaintiff Grand Oaks Maintenance Corporation s Application for Issuance of an Order for Sale of Dwelling is CONTINUED TO JUNE 6, 2022 AT 9:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 26 IN THE SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE.

  • Name

    GRAND OAKS MAINTENANCE CORPORATION VS JAMES HIBBARD, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    18STLC02866

  • Hearing

    Apr 19, 2022

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

Judgment Assignee filed an Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling (the “Application”) on August 20, 2019. On September 24, 2019, the Court set the Order to Show Cause Why Sale of Dwelling Should Not Be Made for November 12, 2019 at 10:30 am in Department 94. On September 25, 2019, Judgment Assignee filed a Notice of Withdrawal of the Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling and a second Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling.

  • Name

    (NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

  • Case No.

    LAM04CC3376

  • Hearing

    Nov 13, 2019

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

On December 8, 2021, Petitioner filed an Amended Application for Order for Sale of Dwelling and Order to Show Cause Why Order for Sale of Dwelling Should Not Be Made.

  • Name

    DAVE MORAN A.K.A. DAVID MORAN VS SIMEON HIXSON A.K.A., SIM J. HIXSON

  • Case No.

    21STCP02429

  • Hearing

    Jan 03, 2022

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

On December 8, 2021, Petitioner filed an Amended Application for Order for Sale of Dwelling and Order to Show Cause Why Order for Sale of Dwelling Should Not Be Made.

  • Name

    DAVE MORAN A.K.A. DAVID MORAN VS SIMEON HIXSON A.K.A., SIM J. HIXSON

  • Case No.

    21STCP02429

  • Hearing

    Jan 03, 2022

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

The Court therefore continues the hearing on this motion/application for order for sale of dwelling. CONCLUSION AND ORDER Plaintiff’s Motion/Application for Order for Sale of Dwelling is continued to August 2, 2019. Plaintiff is ordered to provide notice of this ruling.

  • Name

    LAW OFFICES OF SARA A. WEINSTEIN VS. ROSS FRIEDMAN

  • Case No.

    EC067861

  • Hearing

    Jul 12, 2019

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

Therefore, the application for order of sale of dwelling is taken off calendar in Department 77. The moving party is to contact department F-43 to set a new hearing date for the Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling, with no additional filing fee required. Clerk to give notice.

  • Case No.

    CACHLLCVSMILL

  • Hearing

    Dec 20, 2017

  • Judge

    Elaine Lu or Yolanda Orozco

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

Order To Show Cause Why Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Issue Order To Show Cause Why Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Issue

  • Name

    SUSAN TWEDDLE ET AL VS. JOHN MCGOVERN ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC08481232

  • Hearing

    Mar 20, 2012

Nature of Proceedings: OSC Why Order of Sale of Dwelling Should Not be Made; Application for Order for Sale of Dwelling Tentative

  • Name

    INVESTMENT RETRIEVERS INC VS CRUZ MORENO

  • Case No.

    1267990

  • Hearing

    Jul 29, 2013

Nature of Proceedings: Hearing: Application for Order for Sale of Dwelling; OSC: Why Order of Sale of Dwelling Should Not be Made Tentative

  • Name

    INVESTMENT RETRIEVERS INC VS CRUZ MORENO

  • Case No.

    1267990

  • Hearing

    May 20, 2013

Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Order for Sale of Dwelling and Issuance of OSC Why Order for Sale of Dwelling Should Not Be Made – HEARING REQUIRED.

  • Name

    PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP. VS. BILLAN, GURDEEP S.

  • Case No.

    2029133

  • Hearing

    Dec 28, 2018

Nature of Proceedings: OSC Why Order of Sale of Dwelling Should Not be Made; Application for Order for Sale of Dwelling Awaiting defendant's information re exemption.

  • Name

    INVESTMENT RETRIEVERS INC VS CRUZ MORENO

  • Case No.

    1267990

  • Hearing

    Jun 17, 2013

The Court issues the following ruling on Plaintiff Banafsheh Pezeshk's motion for sale of dwelling: Plaintiff Banafsheh Pezeshk's unopposed motion for sale of dwelling is granted. Plaintiff's motion shows compliance with the requirements of Code Civ. Proc., § 704.740, et seq. (see Plaintiff's Application for Issuance for Order of Sale of Dwelling; Plaintiffs Exhibits A, B and C; Declaration of Banafsheh Pezeshk and Exhibit A attached; Declaration of Samy Henein and Exhibit A attached.)

  • Name

    PEZESHK VS. TORABI

  • Case No.

    37-2013-00031155-CU-BC-NC

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2016

NAVA ENTERPRISE INC CASE CATEGORY: Civil - Unlimited CASE TYPE: Contract - Other EVENT TYPE: Application (CLM) - for Order of Sale of Dwelling CCP Section 704.750 CAUSAL DOCUMENT/DATE FILED: Application for Order for Sale of Dwelling, 07/19/2022 COVID-19 NOTICE: All attorneys and self-represented parties in law and motion hearings are encouraged to appear via Court Call.

  • Case No.

    2018-00512198

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2022

SAHAGUN #7 TENTATIVE ORDER Judgment Creditor and Assignee WV SPE2018-3A, LLC’s unopposed motion for order to accept highest bid for sale of dwelling is DENIED. Judgment Creditor’s alternative motion for a new order for sale of dwelling is GRANTED. Moving Party to give NOTICE. Judgment Creditor and Assignee WV SPE2018-3A, LLC moves for an order to accept highest bid for sale of dwelling or, for a new order for sale of dwelling pursuant to CCP § 704.800(b).

  • Name

    THE BEST SERVICE CO. VS MITSUMASA OKAMOTO-ET AL

  • Case No.

    VC032122

  • Hearing

    Apr 07, 2021

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING (CCP § 704.750) TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff/Creditor Lake Lindero Homeowners Associations Application for Order for Sale of Dwelling located at 5523 Old Salt Lane, Agoura Hills, CA 91301 is GRANTED.

  • Case No.

    21STLC07909

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2023

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

Order To Show Cause Re: Order For Sale Of Dwelling Matter on Calendar for Thursday, October 10, 2013, Line 3, Order To Show Cause Re: Order For Sale Of Dwelling Hearing required. =(302/LCN)

  • Name

    IN RE: LISA AINSWORTH

  • Case No.

    CPF12512400

  • Hearing

    Oct 10, 2013

Order To Show Cause Re: Order For Sale Of Dwelling Matter on Calendar for Wednesday, August 21, 2013, Line 12, Order To Show Cause Re: Order For Sale Of Dwelling Hearing required. =(302/MJM)

  • Name

    IN RE: LISA AINSWORTH

  • Case No.

    CPF12512400

  • Hearing

    Aug 21, 2013

Order To Show Cause Re: Sale Of Dwelling Housing Court Law and Motion's Calendar for Wednesday January 14, 2015 line 1. Order To Show Cause Re: Sale Of Dwelling GRANTED. No opposition filed =(501/REQ)

  • Name

    LESS & WEAVER VS. KAI TAMARA HARE

  • Case No.

    CGC05445461

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2015

Ntc Of Application For Order / Judgment For Sale Of Dwelling Matter on calendar for Thursday, September 13, 2012, Line 1, ASSIGNEE GRYPHON SOLUTIONS, LLC'S Application For Order / Judgment For Sale Of Dwelling. Off calendar. Case settled. =(302/HEK)

  • Name

    CROWN ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC VS. BERT P GABRIEL ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC08474940

  • Hearing

    Sep 13, 2012

Order To Show Cause For Sale Of Dwelling Matter on calendar for Thursday, June 19, 2012, Line 10, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR SALE OF DWELLING. Continued to September 4, 2012 per the agreement of the parties. =(302/HEK)

  • Name

    IN RE: CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST

  • Case No.

    CPF12512101

  • Hearing

    Jul 19, 2012

Evidentiary Hearing Re: Sale Of Dwelling Set for hearing on Tuesday, September 27, 2016, Line 1, Evidentiary Hearing Re: Sale Of Dwelling. The hearing will be at 2:00 p.m. Ms. Tina Wu is required to appear. =(302/HK)

  • Name

    SF BAY BUILDERS, INC VS. BAY CITY VIEW LLC ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC08481417

  • Hearing

    Sep 27, 2016

Ntc Of Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling And Dwelling Real Property/Housing Motion Calendar for Monday, January 12, 2015, Line 1. PLAINTIFF ILANA BARTH Notice Of Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling GRANTED, No Opposition filed. =(501/REQ)

  • Name

    BARTH VS MERRY

  • Case No.

    CGC00313553

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2015

For Issuance For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Set for hearing on Monday, June 13, 2011, line 9, PLAINTIFF SANGER SACRAMENTO STREET, LLC Application And Dec. For Issuance For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling. DENIED. =(302/EHG)

  • Name

    SANGER SACRMAENTO STREET, LLC VS. HE YU JUN ET AL

  • Case No.

    CUD08625556

  • Hearing

    Jun 13, 2011

Notice Of Application For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Real Property/Housing Court Law & Motion Calendar for Thursday, August 27, 2015, line 1. PETITIONER DONALD R. MOODY's Application For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Hearing Required Re: Bankruptcy Status. = (501/REQ)

  • Name

    IN RE: DONALD R. MOODY

  • Case No.

    CPF14513917

  • Hearing

    Aug 27, 2015

HEARING IN RE: APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING AND ISSUANCE OF OSC WHY THE ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING SHOULD NOT BE MADE FILED BY: *TENTATIVE RULING:* Appearance required.

  • Case No.

    N23-1935

  • Hearing

    Dec 18, 2023

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MOTION FOR ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING (CCP §§ 704.760 and 704.780) TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff Seong Shin’s Motion for Order for Sale of Dwelling is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. The Court sets an OSC for Sale of Dwelling for January 15, 2020 at 10:30 a.m. in Department 94. ANALYSIS: On May 6, 2016, this Court entered default judgment in favor of Plaintiff Seong Shin (“Plaintiff”) and against Defendants Defendants Sung Han Kook aka Hong Rul Kook aka Hong R Kook aka Solomon Sung H.

  • Name

    SHIN, SEONG VS KOOK, SUNG HAN

  • Case No.

    13K03389

  • Hearing

    Oct 23, 2019

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

The proof of service (both for posting and mailing) states the following documents were served: application and order for sale of dwelling; declaration of Thomas M. Padlan in support of application for sale of dwelling; memorandum of points and authorities in support of application for sale of dwelling; amended order to show cause why an order for sale of dwelling should not issue. It does not include notice of the hearing on form EJ-180.

  • Name

    NEXTWAVE ENTERPRISES LLC VS YOUNGRAN CHO

  • Case No.

    19STCP02468

  • Hearing

    Nov 14, 2022

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

Notice Of Application For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for, Wednesday, March 25, line 1. PETITIONER DONALD R. MOODY's Notice Of Application For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling. Hearing Required re Bankruptcy. = (501/REQ)

  • Name

    IN RE: DONALD R. MOODY

  • Case No.

    CPF14513917

  • Hearing

    Mar 25, 2015

Notice Of Application For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, November 10, 2015, line 1. PETITIONER DONALD R. MOODY's Application For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling OFF CALENDAR, dismissal filed November 4, 2015. = (501/REQ)

  • Name

    IN RE: DONALD R. MOODY

  • Case No.

    CPF14513917

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2015

Notice Of Application For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Wednesday, May 27, 2015, line 1. PETITIONER DONALD R. MOODY'S Notice Of Application For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Hearing Required for status report. = (501/REQ)

  • Name

    IN RE: DONALD R. MOODY

  • Case No.

    CPF14513917

  • Hearing

    May 27, 2015

Osc Why Order For Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Issue Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, March 14, 2017, line 2. Osc Why Order For Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Issue OFF CALENDAR, per request of the moving party. = (501/AJR)

  • Name

    ERNESTO MEDINA VS. ROBERT G. DOERING

  • Case No.

    CGC12526321

  • Hearing

    Mar 14, 2017

Notice Of Application For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Wednesday, September 30, 2015 line 3. PETITIONER DONALD R. MOODY's Application For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Hearing Required to address the bankruptcy motion status. = (501/REQ)

  • Name

    IN RE: DONALD R. MOODY

  • Case No.

    CPF14513917

  • Hearing

    Sep 30, 2015

Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling (Ccp Secs. 704.750 - 704.770) Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 19, 2018 line 2. PETITIONER 421-435 BUENA VISTA AVENUE EAST ASSOCIATION's Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling (Ccp Secs. 704.750 - 704.770) GRANTED. = (501/REQ)

  • Name

    421-435 BUENA VISTA AVENUE EAST ASSOCIATION VS. DARIN C. MORGAN

  • Case No.

    CPF17515665

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2018

Notice Of Application For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Wednesday, February 25, 2015 line 1. PETITIONER DONALD R. MOODY's Application For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Continued to March 25, 2015 for bankruptcy status report. = (501/REQ)

  • Name

    IN RE: DONALD R. MOODY

  • Case No.

    CPF14513917

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2015

Order To Show Cause Why Order For Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Issue - 51 Seville Street Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Monday August 17, 2015, line 1. OSC Re: Sale of Dwelling - 51 Seville Street GRANTED. No opposition filed. Prevailing party prepare order. = (501/REQ)

  • Name

    ADOLOFO URTECHO ET AL VS. LUIS SEGURA ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC12517315

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2015

Ex Parte Application for Order for Sale of Dwelling and Issuance of OSC Why Order for Sale of Dwelling Should Not Be Made – The Court orders Judgment Debtor Bhajno Pahal, and her spouse if any, and all parties claiming an interest in the property to appear on December 28, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 24 of this Court to show cause, if any, why the Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Sale of Dwelling should not be granted.

  • Name

    PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP. VS. BILLAN, GURDEEP S.

  • Case No.

    2029133

  • Hearing

    Nov 20, 2018

Petitioner Nicola J Rowe; Petitioner Scott M Rowe Application/Request (Application for Issuance of Order of Sale of Dwelling) Petitioners’ Amended Application for Issuance of Order of Sale of Dwelling is denied without prejudice. Petitioners did not submit a proposed order to show cause with their application, and no order to show cause was issued (or served). Code Civ. Proc. § 704.770(a); see, e.g., Cal. Prac. Guide Enf. J. & Debt [Form 6:P] Order to Show Cause Re Sale of Dwelling Order.

  • Name

    ROWE VS. KURD-MISTO

  • Case No.

    30-2019-01080460

  • Hearing

    Apr 15, 2021

Notice Of Motion And Motion On Verified Applicaiton For Issuance Of Sale Of Dwelling; Verified Application Set for hearing on Tuesday, May 15, 2012, Line 10, PETITIONER CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST Motion On Verified Application For Issuance Of Sale Of Dwelling. Continued to May 22, 2012 per the parties' request. =(302/HEK)

  • Name

    IN RE: CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST

  • Case No.

    CPF12512101

  • Hearing

    May 15, 2012

Motion For Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling SET FOR HEARING ON MONDAY, February 6, 2017, LINE 2 ASSIGNEE GLCS, L.L.C.'s Motion for Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling CONTINUED to May 8, 2017 at 9:30 AM in Department 302, per agreement of the parties. =302/HK

  • Name

    MAIN STREET ACQUISITION CORP VS. MARILYN R NERI ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC12525588

  • Hearing

    Feb 06, 2017

Application For Order To Show Cause Why An Order For Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Issue HEARING REQUIRED. TO DETERMINE AMOUNT OF HOMESTEAD EXAMPTION (ALLEGEDLY $75k); DETERMINE FMV OF PROPERTY; ISSUE AN ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING SUBJECT TO HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION. (302/JUDGE MCCARTHY/JU)

  • Name

    WELLS FARGO BANK N A VS DUCOTE

  • Case No.

    CGC97989226

  • Hearing

    Apr 04, 2005

Ntc Of Mtn And Mtn To Recall And Quash Order For Sale Of Dwelling Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Friday, March 14, 2014, line 2. DEFENDANT LEAH AHN's Motion To Recall And Quash Order For Sale Of Dwelling DENIED. See CCP 704.820. Schoenfeld v. Norberg is distinguishable. = (501/REQ)

  • Name

    PRIYA SANGER ET AL VS. LEAH AHN

  • Case No.

    CPF12511985

  • Hearing

    Mar 14, 2014

Order To Show Cause Why Order For Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Be Made Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Thursday, July 06, 2017, line 1. Order To Show Cause Why Order For Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Be Made Off Calendar per moving party. = (501/REQ)

  • Name

    COSIS LLC VS. JOSEPH BRAJKOVICH

  • Case No.

    CPF17515679

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2017

Order To Show Cause Why Order For Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Issue Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 10, 2017 line 1. Order To Show Cause Why Order For Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Issue GRANTED. No opposition filed. Prevailing party prepare order.= (501/REQ)

  • Name

    FOXTROT HOLDINGS, LLC A CALIFORNIA VS. JAMES P FOSTER ET AL

  • Case No.

    CPF17515695

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2017

Order To Show Cause Why Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Be Made Matter on calendar for Wednesday, April 15, 2015, Line 1, Order To Show Cause Why Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Be Made. The matter is continued to May 29, 2015, per stipulation of the parties. =(302/HK)

  • Name

    JOHN WILKINS VS. MARY BAYTOP ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC07467371

  • Hearing

    Apr 15, 2015

Notice Of Application And Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Thursday, May 1, 2014, line 2. PLAINTIFF BRENDA OCHOA, EVE SEGASTURE, JENNER OCHOA and MICHAEL CIOFALO's Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling Hearing Required to address evidence re: debtor's interest in the property. = (501/REQ)

  • Name

    BRENDA OCHOA ET AL VS. ERLINDA SAN JUAN ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC09489587

  • Hearing

    May 01, 2014

Plaintiff'S Order To Show Cause Re: Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling Set for hearing on Wednesday, August 24, 2011, line 5. Plaintiff's Order To Show Cause Re: Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling. Continued to August 25, 2011 to be heard with petition to determine validity of third-party claim. =(302/LMG)

  • Name

    WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. ADI SIMAYOF ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC10498628

  • Hearing

    Aug 24, 2011

On the court's own motion Defendants' Application for Order for Sale of Dwelling and Order to Show Cause why Order for Sale of Dwelling Should Not Be Made set for January 4, 2019 is continued to March 13, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 10A. W. Stephen Scott, Judge of the Superior Court

  • Name

    WAYNE BIER VS. LYNN SMITH

  • Case No.

    STK-CV-UBC-2014-0009392

  • Hearing

    Jan 02, 2019

For Continuance Of Order To Show Cause For Sale Of Dwelling And Order For Service By Mail And Posting Under Ccp Section 704.770 FOR CONTINUANCE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR SALE OF DWELLING AND ORDER FOR SERVICE BY MAIL AND POSTING UNDER CCP SECTION 704.770 - - CONTINUED TO 4-11-05. (302/JUDGE MCCARTHY)

  • Name

    NGUYEN VS MOORE

  • Case No.

    CGC97983788

  • Hearing

    Apr 04, 2005

Order To Show Cause Why Order For Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Issue Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Monday, April 24, 2017, line 1. Order To Show Cause Why Order For Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Issue GRANTED. No opposition filed. Moving party prepare order. April 19, 2017 ruling is vacated. = (501/REQ)

  • Name

    ERNESTO MEDINA VS. ROBERT G. DOERING

  • Case No.

    CGC12526321

  • Hearing

    Apr 24, 2017

S Order To Show Cause Re Issuance Of Order For Sale Of Dwelling SET FOR HEARING ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2007, LINE 1. PLAINTIFF MOUNTAIN PEAKS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE ISSUANCE OF ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING IS OFF CALENDAR PER MOVING PARTY. =(302/PJM)

  • Name

    MOUNTAIN PEAKS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. VS. KARL L PERRY II ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC02407264

  • Hearing

    Feb 15, 2007

Ntc Of Mtn And Mtn To Recall And Quash Order For Sale Of Dwelling HOUSING COURT LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR FOR FRIDAY, MARCH 07, 2014. LINE 2. DEFENDANT LEAH AHN 's Motion To Recall And Quash Order For Sale Of Dwelling. Continued to March 14, 2014 to be heard by the Honorable Ronald Evans Quidachay. = (501/LKS) LATE TENTATIVE.

  • Name

    PRIYA SANGER ET AL VS. LEAH AHN

  • Case No.

    CPF12511985

  • Hearing

    Mar 07, 2014

Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Wednesday, January 25, 2017, line 1. PLAINTIFF ACACIA BANK, BANK ONE, ARIZONA,NA's Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling continued to February 15, 2017 to be heard with OSC Re: Preliminary Injunction in action CGC-17-556279. = (501/REQ)

  • Name

    ACACIA BANK VS. DIAMOND BRIDGE PARTNERS,LLC

  • Case No.

    CGC02406114

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2017

Notice Of Application For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Monday, November 24, 2014, Line 1: PETITIONER DONALD R. MOODY'S Application For Order Of Sale Of Dwelling: OFF CALENDAR. Notice of Application does not comply with CCP 704.770, no order to show cause has been requested or issued. (501/REQ)

  • Name

    IN RE: DONALD R. MOODY

  • Case No.

    CPF14513917

  • Hearing

    Nov 24, 2014

Moving Party Judgement Debtor Tenice Hajali Motion to Set Aside Order For Sale of Dwelling. The motion of judgment debtor for an order setting aside the order for sale of dwelling dated February 24, 2020 is DENIED as MOOT in light of the acknowledgment of full satisfaction of judgment filed on September 18, 2020. Moving party to give notice.

  • Name

    HAJALI V HAJALI

  • Case No.

    30-2015-00790387

  • Hearing

    Sep 01, 2020

Judgment Creditor CACV of Colorado, LLC’s Application for Issuance of Order to Show Cause Why Order for Sale of Dwelling Should Not Be Made, on in the alternative, Order Establishing that Order for Sale of Dwelling Is Not Necessary is placed off-calendar. Discussion On November 27, 2007, this Court entered judgment in favor of CACV of Colorado, LLC (“Judgment Creditor”) and against Norma Renteria (“Judgment Debtor”). The judgment was renewed on November 27, 2017.

  • Name

    CACV OF COLORADO LLC VS RENTERIA, NORMA

  • Case No.

    07K07970

  • Hearing

    Nov 29, 2018

  • Judge

    Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

Notice Of Hrg On Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling Real Property/Housing Motion Calendar for Tuesday, November 08, 2016, Line 9. PLAINTIFF ERNESTO MEDINA Notice Of Hearing On Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling is OFF CALENDAR, no proof of service on file. Additionally, no admissible evidence submitted in support of this application. Exhibits are attached to the Points and Authorities. =(501/REQ)

  • Name

    ERNESTO MEDINA VS. ROBERT G. DOERING

  • Case No.

    CGC12526321

  • Hearing

    Nov 08, 2016

Notice Of Plaintiffs Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling And Order To Show Cause Why Such Sale Should Not Be Ordered - Pos Attached Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for AUG 15, 2018 line 1. PLAINTIFF KAUSHIK DATTANI's Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling And Order To Show Cause Why Such Sale Should Not Be Ordered continued to December 13, 2018 per stipulation and order.= (501/REQ)

  • Name

    KAUSHIK DATTANI VS. MICHAEL JENNINGS ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC13533495

  • Hearing

    Aug 15, 2018

Notice To Junior Lien Holders Of Hearing On Appliation For Order/Judgment For Sale Of Dwelling Set for hearing on Friday, May 11, 2012, Line 1. ASSIGNEE GRYPHON SOLUTIONS, LLC Notice To Junior Lien Holders Of Hearing On Appliation For Order/Judgment For Sale Of Dwelling. Continued on the court's own motion to May 14, 2012 at 9:30 am. to be heard concurrently with the claim of exemption. =(302/HEK)

  • Name

    CACV OF COLORADO, LLC VS. WAYNE WONG ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC04430051

  • Hearing

    May 11, 2012

Legere CASE CATEGORY: Civil - Unlimited CASE TYPE: Enforcement EVENT TYPE: Order To Show Cause (CLM) Why order of sale of dwelling should not be made MOVING PARTY: Gail Teton Landis, David Teton Landis CAUSAL DOCUMENT/DATE FILED: Application for Order for Sale of Dwelling, 02/01/2022 APPEARANCES BRUCE W. HOGAN, counsel, present for Plaintiff(s) telephonically.

  • Case No.

    2022-00562463

  • Hearing

    Apr 21, 2022

for an Order to Show Cause and for Issuance of an Order for Sale of Dwelling against Defendant/Judgment Debtor Kambiz Razaghi (Defendant.)

  • Name

    MS SERVICES, LLC, A WYOMING LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS KAMBIZ RAZAGHI

  • Case No.

    21VECV00882

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2023

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

Nava Enterprise Inc CASE CATEGORY: Civil - Unlimited CASE TYPE: Contract - Other EVENT TYPE: Application (CLM) for Order of Sale of Dwelling CCP Section 704.750 MOVING PARTY: Rabobank NA CAUSAL DOCUMENT/DATE FILED: Application for Order for Sale of Dwelling CCP Section 704.750, 07/19/2022 APPEARANCES BRUCE W. HOGAN, counsel, present for Plaintiff(s) telephonically.

  • Case No.

    2018-00512198

  • Hearing

    Aug 30, 2022

Notice Of Junion Lien Holders Of Hearing On Application For Order/Judgemnt For Sale Of Dwelling;Request For Judicial Notice Matter on calendar for Monday, June 16, 2011, Line 1, ASSIGNEE GRYPHON SOLUTIONS, LLC's Hearing On Application For Order/Judgment For Sale Of Dwelling. Hearing required. Mr. Wong is required to bring courtesy copies of his opposition papers to department 302 no later than 9am on the day of the hearing. =(302/HEK)

  • Name

    CACV OF COLORADO, LLC VS. WAYNE WONG ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC04430051

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2012

Petitioner Vintage Creek, Llc'S Order To Show Cause Why Order For Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Issue (Per Ex Parte Order Of 05/07/10) Set for hearing on Friday, June 11, 2010, line 8, Petitioner Vintage Creek, LLC's Order to Show Cause Why Order for Sale of Dwelling Should Not Issue (Per Ex Parte Order Of 05/07/10.) Off Calendar. Bankruptcy stay filed by Petitioner on 5/14/2010. =(302/CWW)

  • Name

    IN RE: VINTAGE CREEK, LLC

  • Case No.

    CPF10510394

  • Hearing

    Jun 11, 2010

Motion - Other (Application for Order for Sale of Dwelling) Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor E-Tail Network Inc.’s application for order for sale of dwelling is denied without prejudice. The court is unable to determine if the application was timely filed within 20 days of levy. Moreover, no order to show cause was issued or served. Code Civ. Proc., § 704.770(a), (b). Moving party to give notice.

  • Name

    THE E-TAIL NETWORK INC. VS. HEALING SIDEKICK INC.

  • Case No.

    30-2012-00602955

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2021

APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE OF ORDER OF SALE OF DWELLING The application for an order of sale of dwelling is denied unless Plaintiff provides proof of compliance with the notice requirements of Cal Code Civ Proc § 704.770 prior to or at the hearing. If proof of notice is made to the satisfaction of the Court, a hearing will be held to determine whether or not the dwelling is exempt pursuant to CCP §704.780 et seq.

  • Name

    BOSCO CREDIT V GARCIA-LEGORETTA

  • Case No.

    CV172634

  • Hearing

    Jul 31, 2018

Order To Show Cause Re: Order For Sale Of Dwelling Matter on calendar for Monday, August 19, 2013, Line 2, Order To Show Cause Re: Order For Sale Of Dwelling. Hearing required. The Court has received the status report from Respondent Ainsworth and Mary Thomas, and the supplemental declaration of Mr. McKim for petitioner. The Court is inclined to enter the proposed order regarding sale of property submitted by Petitioner. =(302/MJM)

  • Name

    IN RE: LISA AINSWORTH

  • Case No.

    CPF12512400

  • Hearing

    Aug 19, 2013

Notice Of Plaintiffs Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling And Order To Show Cause Why Such Sale Should Not Be Ordered - Pos Attached Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday May 15, 2018, line 1. PLAINTIFF KAUSHIK DATTANI Notice Of Plaintiffs Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling And Order To Show Cause Why Such Sale Should Not Be Ordered - Pos Attached continued to August 15, 2018 per stipulation and order. = (501/REQ)

  • Name

    KAUSHIK DATTANI VS. MICHAEL JENNINGS ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC13533495

  • Hearing

    May 15, 2018

Order To Show Cause Why Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Be Made Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Friday, February 23, 2018, Line 1. Order To Show Cause Why Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Be Made. GRANTED. No opposition filed. Moving party prepare order. Moving party and its counsel is ordered to comply with SFLR 2.7B in future. Failure to do so may result in motion being taken off calendar. =(501/REQ)

  • Name

    MONIKA MENCIA VS. JENNIFER PIERANTONI

  • Case No.

    CPF18515997

  • Hearing

    Feb 23, 2018

Order To Show Cause Re: Order For Sale Of Dwelling Matter on calendar for Monday, December 9, 2013, Line 3: Order To Show Cause Re: Order For Sale Of Dwelling Off calendar because entire action has been dismissed. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. =302/MJM

  • Name

    IN RE: LISA AINSWORTH

  • Case No.

    CPF12512400

  • Hearing

    Dec 09, 2013

OSC re sale of dwelling. No opposition. Request for order for sale of dwelling is granted. The court orders the real property commonly known as 2070 North Chouteau, Orange, CA sold to satisfy the judgment creditors’ money judgment. The court finds that there is no homestead exemption in the property, and that the minimum acceptable bid shall be at least $123,304.74. Judgment creditor to submit a formal order for the court’s execution. Moving party to give notice.

  • Name

    IN RE: THE ESTATE OF MELBA JANE SARRIS

  • Case No.

    30-2017-00935743-CU-PT-CJC

  • Hearing

    Sep 01, 2017

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SALE Plaintiff Richard Son Nguyen’s Motion for Sale of Dwelling and Issuance of Order to Show Cause Why Order for Sale of Dwelling Should Not Be Made is continued to May 3,2019. Plaintiff’s supplemental brief in support of OSC re Sale of Dwelling shall be filed and served 14 court days before the hearing. The defendant’s supplemental brief in opposition to this OSC re Sale of Dwelling shall be filed and served 7 court days before the hearing.

  • Name

    NGUYEN VS. KIEU

  • Case No.

    30-2012-00607998-CU-BC-CJC

  • Hearing

    Mar 22, 2019

(Rousso Decl. ¶8) Based on the foregoing, the application for issuance for order of sale of dwelling commonly known as 9620 Alene Dr., Tujunga, CA 91042 (APN 2563-036-012) is granted. Plaintiffs must submit an order in compliance with CCP 704.780(b).

  • Name

    MARIA VAQUERANO, ET AL. VS. VERA SIEGERT, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    PC057500

  • Hearing

    Aug 11, 2020

Plaintiffs/Judgment Creditors' Application for Issuance of an OSC re: Order for Sale of Dwelling is GRANTED. An Order to Show Cause Why an Order for Sale of Dwelling Should Not Issue is set for August 18, 2017; 8:30 A.M., Department 77. Service of a copy of the show cause order, a copy of the application, and a copy of the notice of hearing is to be made in accordance with the provisions of CCP § 704.770(b). Moving party to give notice.

  • Name

    LAW OFFICES OF SALAR ATRIZADEH APC VS BHATTI, ARSLAN

  • Case No.

    15K02248

  • Hearing

    Jun 27, 2017

  • Judge

    Elaine Lu or Yolanda Orozco

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

Order To Show Cause Re: Order For Sale Of Dwelling Matter on calendar for Tuesday, November 12, 2013, Line 4, Order To Show Cause Re: Order For Sale Of Dwelling. Continued to December 9, 2013 to be heard by Judge Miller. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. =(302/EHG)

  • Name

    IN RE: LISA AINSWORTH

  • Case No.

    CPF12512400

  • Hearing

    Nov 12, 2013

This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Stephen Kaus REVISED TENTATIVE RULING: The Court CONTINUES the hearing on the OSC re: Sale of Dwelling to Wednesday, February 24, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. in Dept. 19. At least five Court days prior to the continued 2/24/2020 hearing date, the Court requests that Plaintiffs' counsel send an email to the Court advising of the status of the action including possible settlement, the pending debtor's examination and the OSC re: Sale of Dwelling.

  • Name

    WILLIAMS VS CERVANIA

  • Case No.

    RG17866672

  • Hearing

    Dec 15, 2020

Order to Show Cause re: Sale of Dwelling The OSC re Sale of Dwelling requested by Judgment Creditor Quinn Rental Services, Inc. is continued to 9/30/21 at 2PM. After the ex parte for an order setting the OSC re Sale of Dwelling was granted on 6/8/21, the parties stipulated to continue the hearing to conduct limited discovery. (ROA 36.) The Court ordered that the hearing would be continued to 9/2/21. Pursuant to the certificate of mailing from the clerk, notice was given to Judgment Creditor.

  • Name

    QUINN RENTAL SERVICES, INC. VS. ROBERTS

  • Case No.

    30-2021-01195284

  • Hearing

    Sep 02, 2021

On June 15, 2023, Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor filed an Amended Verified Application, and at the hearing on July 6, 2023, the Court granted the request for an order for sale of dwelling. (7-6-23 Minute Order.) However, on September 19, 2023, the Court issued an order stating that it had received a Proposed Amended Order for Sale of Dwelling on August 15, 2023 that stated a homestead exemption is on the dwelling. (9-19-23 Minute Order.)

  • Name

    LAKE LINDERO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, A NONPROFIT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORPORATION VS CHRISTOPHE BARONE, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    21STLC07909

  • Hearing

    Nov 15, 2023

  • Judge

    Echo Dawn Ryan

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

Order To Show Cause For Sale Of Dwelling Set for hearing on Tuesday, September 4, 2012, Line 7. Order To Show Cause For Sale Of Dwelling. Denied. Plaintiff was required to file supplemental moving papers by June 15, 2012, but as yet has not done so. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. =(302/HEK)

  • Name

    IN RE: CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST

  • Case No.

    CPF12512101

  • Hearing

    Sep 04, 2012

Notice Of Plaintiffs Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling And Order To Show Cause Why Such Sale Should Not Be Ordered - Pos Attached Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Wednesday, February 15, 2018, Line 1. PLAINTIFF KAUSHIK DATTANI'S Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling And Order To Show Cause Why Such Sale Should Not Be Ordered. Continued to May 15, 2018 per stipulation and order.

  • Name

    KAUSHIK DATTANI VS. MICHAEL JENNINGS ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC13533495

  • Hearing

    Feb 15, 2018

The Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling is granted as prayed. The judgment creditor makes a sufficient showing for an Order of Sale of Dwelling.

  • Name

    FERREY VS HASSO-NAJM

  • Case No.

    GIN043020

  • Hearing

    Feb 21, 2019

Osc Re Sale Of Dwelling On calendar for Thursday, October 27 2011, Line 17, OSC Re Sale Of Dwelling. Granted. No opposition filed. The prevailing party is required to bring a proposed order to the hearing even if the motion is not opposed or the tentative ruling is not contested.

  • Name

    IN RE: KEY REAL ESTATE EQUITY CAPITAL INC.

  • Case No.

    CPF10510905

  • Hearing

    Oct 27, 2011

Order To Show Cause Why Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Be Made Matter on calendar for Friday, May 29, 2015, Line 1, Order To Show Cause Why Order Of Sale Of Dwelling Should Not Be Made. Hearing Required. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

  • Name

    JOHN WILKINS VS. MARY BAYTOP ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC07467371

  • Hearing

    May 29, 2015

APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING Petitioner LSREF2 Nova Investments, LLC’s Application for Issuance of Order for Sale of Dwelling is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. At the previous hearing on April 4, 2019, the Court instructed Petitioner to file supplemental papers to demonstrate that the moving papers had been served in accordance with CCP § 704.770(b). To date, Petitioner has not done so, and Respondent has not been afforded notice and opportunity to respond to the instant Petition.

  • Name

    LSREF2 NOVA INVESTMENTS, LLC VS ROBERT LYNCH

  • Case No.

    18STCP02633

  • Hearing

    Jun 11, 2019

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Wendy Chang

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

Pursuant to the A pplication for Issuance of Order for Sale of Dwelling , the Court would an Order to Show Cause Why Order for Sale of Dwelling Should Not Be Made. However, in light of the Notice of Bankruptcy Stay, the action is now stayed. Conclusion ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE STATUS OF BANKRUPTCY STAY IS SET FOR MAY 7, 2024 AT 9:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 26 IN THE SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE. Court clerk to give notice.

  • Case No.

    LAM07Y02023

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2024

  • Judge

    Echo Dawn Ryan

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Thursday, February 15, 2017, line 1. PLAINTIFF ACACIA BANK, BANK ONE, ARIZONA,NA's Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling GRANTED. Hearing on OSC why the dwelling shall not be sold is set for February 28, 2017. Judgment debtor and any interested third parties shall file a response no later than February 22, 2017. Judgment creditors shall file a reply no later than February 24, 2017.

  • Name

    ACACIA BANK VS. DIAMOND BRIDGE PARTNERS,LLC

  • Case No.

    CGC02406114

  • Hearing

    Feb 15, 2017

Order To Show Cause Re: Sale Of Dwelling Set for hearing on Thursday, August 25, 2016, Line 1, Order To Show Cause Re: Sale Of Dwelling. Hearing required.

  • Name

    SF BAY BUILDERS, INC VS. BAY CITY VIEW LLC ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC08481417

  • Hearing

    Aug 25, 2016

Evidentiary Hearing Re: Sale Of Dwelling Set for hearing on Thursday, September 15, 2016, Line 1, Evidentiary Hearing Re: Sale Of Dwelling is continued to September 27, 2016 at 2:00 p.m., in Dept. 302 per stipulation and Order signed on September 7, 2016. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

  • Name

    SF BAY BUILDERS, INC VS. BAY CITY VIEW LLC ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC08481417

  • Hearing

    Sep 15, 2016

MOTION FOR ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING In view of Defendant’s notice of appeal filed 9/12/18 and the automatic stay of proceedings upon the filing of that appeal, the hearing on the motion for order for sale of dwelling is continued Nov. 15, 2018 on the condition Defendant timely cure the default identified in the Appellant’s Notice of Default dated 9/12/18 (issued for Appellant’s failure to make the required deposit for the Clerk’s Transcript on appeal) and to post a bond in the amount of the Judgment of $139,715.76

  • Name

    LEVY V. COETZEE

  • Case No.

    17CV00622

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2018

On September 12, 2018, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause re: Sale of Dwelling to Defendant Donna L. Johnsen (“Johnsen”). On December 10, 2018, Plaintiff National Enterprises, Inc. filed an Acknowledgment of Satisfaction of Judgment as to Johnsen. (See 12/10/18 Acknowledgment of Satisfaction of Judgment.) For this reason, there is no longer any basis to order a sale of Johnsen’s dwelling because she has satisfied her judgment debt. The OSC Hearing re: Sale of Dwelling is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR as MOOT.

  • Name

    NATIONAL ENTERPRISES INC VS JOHNSEN, GORDON M

  • Case No.

    07K02824

  • Hearing

    Jan 15, 2019

  • Judge

    Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

BECKLEY APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING The application for an order of sale of dwelling is denied unless plaintiff provides proof of compliance with the notice requirements of Cal. Code Civ Proc § 704.770 prior to or at the hearing. If proof of notice is made to the satisfaction of the court, a hearing will be held to determine whether or not the dwelling is exempt pursuant to Cal. Code of Civ. Pro.§ 704.780 et seq.

  • Name

    MICHAEL RHOADS VS MATTHEW BECKLEY

  • Case No.

    19CV02702

  • Hearing

    Mar 19, 2023

  • County

    Santa Cruz County, CA

BECKLEY APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING The application for an order of sale of dwelling is denied unless plaintiff provides proof of compliance with the notice requirements of Cal. Code Civ Proc § 704.770 prior to or at the hearing. If proof of notice is made to the satisfaction of the court, a hearing will be held to determine whether or not the dwelling is exempt pursuant to Cal. Code of Civ. Pro.§ 704.780 et seq.

  • Name

    MICHAEL RHOADS VS MATTHEW BECKLEY

  • Case No.

    19CV02702

  • Hearing

    Mar 17, 2023

  • County

    Santa Cruz County, CA

BECKLEY APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING The application for an order of sale of dwelling is denied unless plaintiff provides proof of compliance with the notice requirements of Cal. Code Civ Proc § 704.770 prior to or at the hearing. If proof of notice is made to the satisfaction of the court, a hearing will be held to determine whether or not the dwelling is exempt pursuant to Cal. Code of Civ. Pro.§ 704.780 et seq.

  • Name

    MICHAEL RHOADS VS MATTHEW BECKLEY

  • Case No.

    19CV02702

  • Hearing

    Mar 18, 2023

  • County

    Santa Cruz County, CA

BECKLEY APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING The application for an order of sale of dwelling is denied unless plaintiff provides proof of compliance with the notice requirements of Cal. Code Civ Proc § 704.770 prior to or at the hearing. If proof of notice is made to the satisfaction of the court, a hearing will be held to determine whether or not the dwelling is exempt pursuant to Cal. Code of Civ. Pro.§ 704.780 et seq.

  • Name

    MICHAEL RHOADS VS MATTHEW BECKLEY

  • Case No.

    19CV02702

  • Hearing

    Mar 21, 2023

  • County

    Santa Cruz County, CA

BECKLEY APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING The application for an order of sale of dwelling is denied unless plaintiff provides proof of compliance with the notice requirements of Cal. Code Civ Proc § 704.770 prior to or at the hearing. If proof of notice is made to the satisfaction of the court, a hearing will be held to determine whether or not the dwelling is exempt pursuant to Cal. Code of Civ. Pro.§ 704.780 et seq.

  • Name

    MICHAEL RHOADS VS MATTHEW BECKLEY

  • Case No.

    19CV02702

  • Hearing

    Mar 22, 2023

  • County

    Santa Cruz County, CA

BECKLEY APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING The application for an order of sale of dwelling is denied unless plaintiff provides proof of compliance with the notice requirements of Cal. Code Civ Proc § 704.770 prior to or at the hearing. If proof of notice is made to the satisfaction of the court, a hearing will be held to determine whether or not the dwelling is exempt pursuant to Cal. Code of Civ. Pro.§ 704.780 et seq.

  • Name

    MICHAEL RHOADS VS MATTHEW BECKLEY

  • Case No.

    19CV02702

  • Hearing

    Mar 23, 2023

  • County

    Santa Cruz County, CA

BECKLEY APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING The application for an order of sale of dwelling is denied unless plaintiff provides proof of compliance with the notice requirements of Cal. Code Civ Proc § 704.770 prior to or at the hearing. If proof of notice is made to the satisfaction of the court, a hearing will be held to determine whether or not the dwelling is exempt pursuant to Cal. Code of Civ. Pro.§ 704.780 et seq.

  • Name

    MICHAEL RHOADS VS MATTHEW BECKLEY

  • Case No.

    19CV02702

  • Hearing

    Mar 20, 2023

  • County

    Santa Cruz County, CA

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope