What is an Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling?

Useful Rulings on Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling

Recent Rulings on Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling

PENTECH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. VS RENE MEDINA

On March 12, 2020, a “Stipulation and Order Re: Appointment of Appraiser for Plaintiff’s Application for Sale of Dwelling” was filed, wherein Jim Andritch (“Andritch”) was appointed as appraiser. The court is not in receipt of any appraisal from Andritch as of July 6, 2020, 11:56 a.m.

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

1ST MERCHANT FUNDING LLC VS. BARBAR, INC.

F-47 Date: 7/6/20 Case #PC057946 HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR SALE OF DWELLING & ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY AN ORDER FOR SALE SHOULD NOT BE MADE Notice of Hearing & Application filed on 8/1/19. MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff 1st Merchant Funding, LLC RESPONDING PARTY: Third Party Dana Baker and Defendants Barbar, Inc. and Dominic Barbar RELIEF REQUESTED: An order permitting the sale of the dwelling commonly known as 28361 Falcon Crest Drive, Santa Clarita, CA 91351.

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

CAPITAL FINANCIAL CREDIT. LLC VS DAVID PULIDO

To attend the remote hearing with Judge Kronlund in Dept. 10-D: Call into (209) 992-5590, then follow the prompts and use the Bridge # and Pin # as follows: Bridge # 6940 Pin # 3782 Tentative Ruling Assignee's motion for Order for sale of dwelling to satisfy a judgment of assignee is Continued on the Court's own motion.

  • Hearing

    Jun 11, 2020

FISCAL FUNDING VS ALAN DONES

HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR SALE OF DWELLING HOUSE ( PER ORDER FILED 01-24-2020 ) * TENTATIVE RULING: * This was continued to July 29 at a CMC earlier this week. The Court is not clear on the state of the bankruptcy and how it affects this application. Moreover, it is still concerned that the plaintiff in the case, Fiscal Funding, is a corporation but appears to be unrepresented by counsel.

  • Hearing

    Jun 05, 2020

AUBURN LAKE TRAILS V. MAXIMOVITCH

One proof of service filed on March 4, 2020 declares that on February 27, 2020 the judgment debtor was personally served the verified petition, moving papers, the proposed order for sale of dwelling, and proposed OSC (Emphasis the court’s.) at the El Dorado County Jail in South Lake Tahoe.

  • Hearing

    Jun 05, 2020

AUBURN LAKE TRAILS V. MAXIMOVITCH

One proof of service filed on March 4, 2020 declares that on February 27, 2020 the judgment debtor was personally served the verified petition, moving papers, the proposed order for sale of dwelling, and proposed OSC (Emphasis the court’s.) at the El Dorado County Jail in South Lake Tahoe.

  • Hearing

    Mar 20, 2020

MARK RODRIGUES VS. NICOLAS STEELE ET. AL.

Case Number SC120499 Hearing Date: March 13, 2020 Judgment Creditor’s Application for Sale of Dwelling – Supplemental Briefing Judgment creditor Rodrigues holds a judgment of nearly $9 million against judgment debtors. Creditor seeks to enforce the judgment via a sale of debtors’ dwelling; debtors oppose the sale. On February 20, 2020, the court continued a hearing on creditor’s application for an order of sale to allow both parties to provide additional briefing regarding the issue of title.

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

PENTECH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. VS RENE MEDINA

Medina, et al. (19PSCP00030) _____________________________________________ WVJP 2017-2, as Assignee for Judgment Creditor Pentech Financial Services, Inc.’s APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR THE SALE OF DWELLING Responding Party: Judgment Debtors, Rene Medina and Maria Medina Tentative Ruling See below. Background On April 20, 2009, a judgment was filed in case styled Pentech Financial Services, Inc. v.

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2020

PENTECH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. VS RENE MEDINA

Medina, et al. (19PSCP00043) _____________________________________________ WVJP 2017-2, as Assignee for Judgment Creditor Pentech Financial Services, Inc.’s APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR THE SALE OF DWELLING Responding Party: Judgment Debtors, Rene Medina and Maria Medina Tentative Ruling See below. Background On April 20, 2009, a judgment was filed in case styled Pentech Financial Services, Inc. v.

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2020

MARK RODRIGUES VS. NICOLAS STEELE ET. AL.

App. 2d 278 the court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate title in a hearing based on an application for sale of dwelling. Plaintiff’s reply at pgs. 2-3.

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

CADLES OF WEST VIRGINIA VS. GALE G. WAVRA

Wavra (KS021033) _____________________________________________ Judgment Creditor Cadles of West Virginia LLC’s APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR THE SALE OF DWELLING Responding Party: None (unopposed, as of 2/4/20, 1:26 p.m.) Tentative Ruling See below.

  • Hearing

    Feb 10, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Conclusion Based on the foregoing, the Application for Issuance of an Order for Sale of Dwelling is GRANTED. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Feb 05, 2020

CADLES OF WEST VIRGINIA VS. GALE G. WAVRA

Wavra (KS021033) _____________________________________________ Judgment Creditor Cadles of West Virginia LLC’s APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR THE SALE OF DWELLING Responding Party: None (unopposed, as of 1/16/20, 7:53 a.m.) Tentative Ruling Judgment Creditor Cadles of West Virginia LLC’s Application for Order for the Sale of Dwelling is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2020

IN RE: CLINTOX LABORATORIES, INC.

The Court is therefore prepared to conduct a hearing on the judgment creditor’s application for sale of dwelling. The preliminary issue is whether the Property (i.e., the dwelling) is subject to a homestead exemption.

  • Hearing

    Dec 31, 2019

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Conclusion Based on the foregoing, the Application for Issuance of an Order for Sale of Dwelling is GRANTED. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Dec 16, 2019

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Conclusion Based on the foregoing, the Application for Issuance of an Order for Sale of Dwelling is GRANTED. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Dec 16, 2019

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

UMINA V. LUMINA

Motion Re: Sale of Dwelling and Issuance of OSC. The parties stipulated to a bifurcated court trial on the single issue of the validity of the LMMK Trust. On November 5, 11, and 12, 2007 a court trial was held on the issue of the validity of the LMMK Trust. After further briefings by the parties, the matter was taken under submission and on December 11, 2007 the court rendered its interlocutory judgment on the issue finding that the LMMK Trust was not a valid trust.

  • Hearing

    Dec 06, 2019

FROST V. FROST

Motion Re: OSC Why Order of Sale of Dwelling Should not be Made. Kris Frost requests an order directing the sale of Stephen Frost’s dwelling located in El Dorado County on the ground that there remains due and unpaid a judgment debt in the amount of $184,715.86 arising from a June 1, 1992 judgment entered in Sacramento County Superior Court case number FL858759. At the hearing on July 15, 2019 the court advised counsel that this needs to be a noticed motion.

  • Hearing

    Dec 06, 2019

CRYSTAL COVE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION V. OH

The court must make an order for the sale of dwelling unless the court determines that the sale of the dwelling would not be likely to produce a bid sufficient to satisfy any part of the amount due on the judgment. Code Civ. Proc. § 704.780(2)(b). Here, there is sufficient equity in the property to satisfy all lines and encumbrances against it. The appraised fair market value of the property is $6 million.

  • Hearing

    Dec 05, 2019

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Judgment Assignee filed an Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling (the “Application”) on August 20, 2019. On September 24, 2019, the Court set the Order to Show Cause Why Sale of Dwelling Should Not Be Made for November 12, 2019 at 10:30 am in Department 94. On September 25, 2019, Judgment Assignee filed a Notice of Withdrawal of the Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling and a second Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling.

  • Hearing

    Nov 13, 2019

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

NORWALK MANOR HOME OWNERS VS GUZMAN, VICTOR MANUEL

Plaintiff filed the instant Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling (the “Application”) on June 6, 2019. On September 24, 2019, Plaintiff filed a proposed Order to Show Cause Why Order of Sale of Dwelling Should Not Be Made, and the court accordingly set an Order to Show Cause Why Sale of Dwelling Should Not Be Made for November 13, 2019 at 10:30 am in Department 94. II.

  • Hearing

    Nov 13, 2019

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

BALBOA CAPITAL CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS SAMVEL GUKASYAN

.: 19BBCP00266 Hearing Date: November 1, 2019 [TENTATIVE] order RE: Application for issuance of order for sale of dwelling BACKGROUND Plaintiff Balboa Capital Corp. (“Plaintiff”) filed the Application for Issuance of Order for Sale of Dwelling on July 22, 2019. The application seeks a Court order that the dwelling located at 7445 Tranquil Drive, Tujunga, CA 91042 be sold at auction against Defendant/judgment debtor Samvel Gukasyan (“Gukasyan”).

  • Hearing

    Nov 01, 2019

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

SHIN, SEONG VS KOOK, SUNG HAN

MOTION FOR ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING (CCP §§ 704.760 and 704.780) TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff Seong Shin’s Motion for Order for Sale of Dwelling is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. The Court sets an OSC for Sale of Dwelling for January 15, 2020 at 10:30 a.m. in Department 94. ANALYSIS: On May 6, 2016, this Court entered default judgment in favor of Plaintiff Seong Shin (“Plaintiff”) and against Defendants Defendants Sung Han Kook aka Hong Rul Kook aka Hong R Kook aka Solomon Sung H.

  • Hearing

    Oct 23, 2019

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS VS. BREWSTER

On September 12, 2019, Judgment Creditor withdrew the motion for order for sale of dwelling. Because that issue is no longer before the Court, the Judgment Debtor’s Claim of Exemption is moot. Absent an appearance by the parties to advise the Court otherwise, the Court intends to close this file and vacate future dates. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar. MEDRANO v. EDWARDS Tentative Ruling on Defendants’ Motion to Continue: Request for Judicial Notice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 21, 2019

CRYSTAL COVE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION V. OH

RULING: The application for order for sale of dwelling is denied without prejudice. Judgment creditor may re-file the application with all of the information specified in Code Civ. Proc. § 704.760. If it is sufficient, the court will follow the procedure in Code Civ. Proc. § 704.770 and issue an Order to the judgment debtors to Show Cause why an order for sale of dwelling should not be issued. Future Hearings: None

  • Hearing

    Oct 10, 2019

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 16     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.