arrow left
arrow right
  • RIVERA, JOANNIE vs. LENNAR HOMES, LLC. OTHER - NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • RIVERA, JOANNIE vs. LENNAR HOMES, LLC. OTHER - NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • RIVERA, JOANNIE vs. LENNAR HOMES, LLC. OTHER - NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • RIVERA, JOANNIE vs. LENNAR HOMES, LLC. OTHER - NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • RIVERA, JOANNIE vs. LENNAR HOMES, LLC. OTHER - NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • RIVERA, JOANNIE vs. LENNAR HOMES, LLC. OTHER - NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • RIVERA, JOANNIE vs. LENNAR HOMES, LLC. OTHER - NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • RIVERA, JOANNIE vs. LENNAR HOMES, LLC. OTHER - NEGLIGENCE document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 186004070 E-Filed 11/13/2023 02:41:05 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA JOANNIE RIVERA, as the Personal CIVIL DIVISION Representative of the Estate of Kasen Baker, a deceased minor, CASE NO: 2023 CA-000415 ON Plaintiff, v. LENNAR HOMES, LLC.; LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC; LENNAR HOMES HOLDING, LLC; BOB’S POOL SERVICE, INC. d/b/a BOB’S POOLS AND SCREENS; BOB’S POOLS & SCREENS, INC.; HARDSCAPERS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, LLC; LW SYSTEMS, INC.; MTCI PRIVATE PROVIDER SERVICES, LLC d/b/a MTCI; and ATLAS VACATION HOMES, LLC. Defendants. / MOTION TO COMPEL BETTER DISCOVERY RESPONSES FROM DEFENDANT, LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, files this motion to compel better discovery responses from Defendant, LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC (“LEN”), and states: 1. This case arises from the tragic drowning of Kasen Baker, a four-year-old minor child, who died on February 26, 2021. Kasen drowned because of Defendants’ negligence in, among other things, building short-term rental properties with unreasonably dangerous pool safety mesh fences that are supposed to be attached to a paver brick that was not secured. 2. Defendant, LEN, along with the other Defendants named herein, was involved in designing and constructing the subject property, subject pool, pool deck, and pool safety fence. 1 CASE NO: 2023 CA-000415 ON 3. The discovery responses/objections are attached as Composite Exhibit A, and further identified herein. 4. Undersigned counsel certifies that good faith attempts to resolve this matter without court action were undertaken before filing this motion, specifically, emails were exchanged with opposing counsel identifying the deficient discovery responses and additional time was provided to Defendant to provide better responses. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.380(a)(2); Admin. Order 2012-03- 01. 5. Further, as per Administrative Order 2012-03-01 and this Court’s specific Meet and Confer instructions, undersigned counsel scheduled and held a substantive meet and confer with opposing counsel on October 23, 2023. However, following the meet and confer, Defendant did not provide any revised responses or additional documents to address the specific deficiencies identified by Plaintiff in an email provided before the meet and confer. That initial email, dated October 16, 2023, identified the objections at issue and requested better responses. To date, better responses and additional documents have not been provided. 6. After filing this Motion undersigned will continue to try to resolve these matters without the need for a hearing and if successful undersigned will cancel the hearing. 7. Plaintiff’s counsel requests an award of expenses including attorney’s fees pursuant to this Court’s procedures and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.380(a)(4) if this motion is granted. OBJECTIONS AT ISSUE As described in the October 16, 2023, email, in response to Plaintiff’s Request for Production (“RFP”) #1, 4, 10-12, 21, 36, and 44-45, Defendant states “responsive documents will be produced under a separate cover.” However, no additional documents were produced, nor was the response revised to indicate that that occurred. Thus, Plaintiff must assume not all responsive 2 CASE NO: 2023 CA-000415 ON documents were produced. Accordingly, Plaintiff requests that Defendant provide an updated response and also produce the responsive documents immediately. In response to RFP Request #3, Defendant indicated it “will provide the applicable excess insurance policy” upon execution of a mutually confidentiality order. Defendant similarly responded in its Answers to Interrogatory, Request #2. However, after Plaintiff asked Defendant to provide its proposed Confidentiality Agreement and/or Order, nothing was provided. To expedite this matter and avoid delaying it further, Plaintiff hereby stipulates to keep these items confidential for purposes of this case and destroy these confidential documents at the conclusion of this litigation; however, the documents should be produced. Defendant may stamp the word confidential on each of these insurance documents to make the matter clear. In response to RFP Request #7, 30, and 31-32, Defendant raised objections (e.g. over broad, vague), asserted privileges, and then responded, only in part. However, in addition to the fact that such boilerplate objections are improper, Plaintiff cannot ascertain whether responsive documents have been withheld subject to privilege or otherwise. Accordingly, Plaintiff asks the Court to overrule the objections and order Defendant to provide the documents or indicate there are none. Regarding Defendant’s claims of privilege, Florida Rule 1.280(b)(6) states: (6)Claims of Privilege or Protection of Trial Preparation Materials. When a party withholds information otherwise discoverable under these rules by claiming that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial preparation material, the party shall make the claim expressly and shall describe the nature of the documents, communications, or things not produced or disclosed in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable other parties to assess the applicability of the privilege or protection. Notwithstanding this very clear rule, Defendant did not provide a privilege log and failed to provide any required information supporting the alleged claims of privilege. Plaintiff then 3 CASE NO: 2023 CA-000415 ON provided Defendants with significant opportunities to provide a privilege log and, to date, Defendant has not done so. Accordingly, Defendant has waived any applicable privilege. See TIG Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 799 So.2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (holding that “insurer’s failure to prepare privilege log identifying correspondence with attorney resulted in waiver of any attorney-client and work-product privileges.”); see also Kaye Scholer LLP v. Zalis, 878 So.2d 447, 449 (3d DCA 2004); General Motors Corp. v. McGee, 837 So.2d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Hess, 814 So.2d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); TIG at 339. Defendant’s nonspecific boilerplate objections in these and other responses included herein are inappropriate and prohibited in certain courts by standing order. See e.g. Standing Discovery Order, 15th Judicial Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County, Florida attached hereto as Exhibit B, at page 2. Similarly, general objections as vague, overly broad, and unduly burdensome are improper. See id. A party making such objections must state the specific and particular way in which a discovery request is vague, seeks irrelevant information, or is unduly burdensome. See also Topp Telecom, Inc. v. Atkins, 763 So.2d 1197, 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Moreover, a party may not state formulaic objections followed by an answer. See Exhibit B at pages 3-4. Such responses “preserve nothing” and “leaves the requesting party uncertain as to whether the discovery request (as propounded) has actually been fully answered, whether the response relates only to the request as unilaterally narrowed by the responding party, and whether the responding party is withholding any responsive materials.” Id. at 3. The “proper practice is to state (1) whether documents are being provided in response to the request and identify those documents by sequential number or category, and (2) whether any responsive documents are being withheld, and if so the specific legal basis for that objection.” Id. 4 CASE NO: 2023 CA-000415 ON The Palm Beach Court’s Standing Order also notes that indicating documents will be produced at an indeterminate time is inappropriate because it “is not a response and only serves to delay the discovery process.” Id. Finally, “generalized objections asserting attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine do not comply with the Rules.” Id. at 5. For these reasons, and the others set forth herein, Defendant’s objections should be overruled and it should be ordered to provide the required privilege log with the information Florida law requires. In Response to RFP Request #22-28, and 37-38, Defendant again raised boilerplate objections (e.g. over broad), asserted privileges, and no documents were produced. For the same reasons set forth above and included authority cited herein, the objections should be overruled and Defendant should be ordered to provide a privilege log and updated responses that are clear as to whether the documents have been produced and if not produce them. In response to RFP Request #33, and 41-43, Defendant again raised improper boilerplate objections (e.g. over broad, unduly burdensome) and no documents were produced. For the same reasons set forth above and included authority cited herein, the objections should be overruled and Defendant should be ordered to provide updated responses that are clear as to whether the documents have been produced and if not produce them. In response to RFP Request #34, 35, and 46-50, Defendant raised improper objections (e.g. over broad, unduly burdensome) and then responded, only in part. For the same reasons set forth above and included authority cited herein, the objections should be overruled and Defendant should be ordered to provide updated responses that are clear as to whether the documents have been produced and if not produce them. Lastly, in response to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories, Defendant raised objections and then answered, only in part Interrogatories #2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 23, 25. For the same reasons set 5 CASE NO: 2023 CA-000415 ON forth above, which prohibit objecting and responding only partially in this manner, the objections should be overruled, and Defendant should be ordered to provide complete responses. WHEREFORE, for each of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff requests that the Court overrule Defendant’s objections, find that any alleged privilege has been waived or compel Defendant to respond with a privilege log, and order Defendant to immediately produce the requested discovery materials that are in its possession, custody, or control. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a lawver in my firm with full authority to resolve this matter had a substantive conversation in person, by telephone or by video conference with opposing counsel in a good faith effort to resolve this motion before the motion was noticed for hearing but the parties were unable to reach an agreement. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was filed with the Osceola County Court by using the Florida Court’s e-Filing Portal on this 13th day of November 2023 with an automatically generated email to those parties listed on the attached Service List. RATZAN WEISSMAN & BOLDT Attorneys for Plaintiffs 2850 Tigertail Avenue, Suite 400 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Telephone: (305) 374-6366 Facsimile: (305) 374-6755 By: s/Mario R. Giommoni __ Stuart N. Ratzan Florida Bar No.: 911445 Stuart@rwblawyers.com Stuart J. Weissman Florida Bar No.: 57909 StuartW@rwblawyers.com Mario R. Giommoni 6 CASE NO: 2023 CA-000415 ON Florida Bar No.: 97925 Mario@rwblawyers.com SERVICE LIST Rick Freedman, Esq. Rick Freedman & Associates, P.A. Attorney For: Joannie Rivera 3350 SW 148th Avenue, Suite 110 Miramar, FL 33027 Phone: (305) 448-8585 Fax: (954) 433-9776 Email Address: Rickfreedmanlaw@aol.com;cristina.freedmanlaw@aol.com Carlos B. Salup, Esq. Salup Rodriguez, PLLC Attorney For: LW Systems, Inc. 2665 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 301 Miami, FL 33133 Phone: (305) 722-5500 Fax: (305) 722-7275 Email Address: Csalup@SalupRodriguez.com;Cdiaz- Valdes@SalupRodriguez.com;Fflynn@SalupRodriguez.com Christine Welstead Bowman & Brooke, LLC Attorney For: Lennar Homes Holding, LLC Two Alhambra Plaza, Suite 800 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Phone: (305) 595-5600 Fax: (305) 995-6100 Email Address: christine.welstead@bowmanandbrooke.com;Carolina.pinero@bowmanandbrooke.com;Neysa.B owles@bowmanandbrooke.com;Ashleigh.Carroll@bowmanandbrooke.com;Maria.Esteva@bow manandbrooke.com Gabriel Costa, Esq./Hitham Eldaher, Esq. Callahan & Fusco, LLC Attorney For: LEN OT Holdings, Lennar Homes, LLC and Lennar Homes Holding, LLC 200 SW 1st Avenue,Suite 840 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (877) 618-9770 Fax: (954) 252-2308 7 CASE NO: 2023 CA-000415 ON Email Address: gcosta@callahanfusco.com;heldaher@callahanfusco.com;eserve@callahanfusco.com;daisaza@c allahanfusco.com Gregory J. Prusak,Esq. Kubicki Draper Attorney For: Bob's Pool Service, Inc. d/b/a Bobs Pools and Screens and Bob's Pools and Screens, Inc. 201 S. Orange Ave, Suite 475 Orlando, FL 32801 Phone: (407) 245-3630 Fax: (407) 245-7685 Email Address: gp-kd@kubickidraper.com;nancy.donaldson@kubickidraper.com Jan Trendowski, Esq. Callahan & Fusco, LLC Attorney For: LEN OT Holdings, Lennar Homes, LLC and Lennar Homes Holding, LLC 200 SW 1st Avenue, Suite 940 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (877) 618-9770 Email Address: jtrendowski@callahanfusco.com;jsantana@callahanfusco.com Joshua Roth, Esq./Jennifer Miller, Esq. Hamilton, Miller & Birthisel, LLP Attorney For: Hardscapers of Central Florida, LLC 150 Southeast Second Avenue, Suite 1200 Miami, FL 33131 Phone: (305) 379-3686 Email Address: jroth@hamiltonmillerlaw.com;jmiller@hamiltonmillerlaw.com;mcanatsey@hamiltonmillerlaw.c om;svargas@hamiltonmillerlaw.com Sanaz Alempour, Esq. Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A. Attorney For: MTCI Private Provider Services, LLC 600 North Pine Island Road Suite 500 Plantation, FL 33324 Phone: (954) 473-1112 Fax: (954) 474-7979 Email Address: sanaz.alempour@csklegal.com;toni.ortiz@csklegal.com;courtney.kaiser@csklegal.com;marybet h.stone-kassner@csklegal.com 8 EXHIBIT A IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2023-CA-00415-ON JOANNIE RIVERA, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kasen Baker, a deceased minor, Plaintiff, v. LENNAR HOMES, LLC; LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC; LENNAR HOMES HOLDING, LLC; BOB’S POOL SERVICE, INC. D/B/A BOB’S POOLS AND SCREENS; BOB’S POOLS & SCREENS, INC.; HARDSCAPERS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, LLC; LW SYSTEMS, INC.; MTCI PROVIATE PROVIDER SERVICES, LLC d/b/a MTCI; and ATLAS VACATION HOMES, LLC, Defendant. _____________________________________________/ DEFENDANT, LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC.’s NOTICE OF SERVING RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION Defendant, Len OT Holdings, LLC. (“Len OT”), by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.350, hereby notifies the Court that it has served responses to Plaintiff’s Initial Request for Production to the Plaintiff and its counsel on June 30, 2023. 1 DEFENDANT’S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION. 1. Any and all documents identified in your answers to Plaintiff’s interrogatories. RESPONSE: Responsive documents will be produced under a separate cover. 2. Any and all statements of Plaintiffs, their representatives, and/or agents. RESPONSE: To the extent applicable, see produced body camera footage, wherein Brianna McFarland Made statements to Osceola County Sheriff’s Office, including but not limited to verbal statements made to Officers that were recorded through body camera footage. Additionally, see produced 911 calls and sworn statements provided to the Osceola County Sheriff’s Office produced under a separate cover. 3. Please provide complete and full copy(ies) of all insurance policies, including excess and/or umbrella coverage, which may cover you for the allegations set forth in Plaintiff’s complaint; including the declaration pages, policy forms, all endorsements, and all amendments thereto. (Do not provide only the Declarations page) RESPONSE: Defendant denies any wrongful and/or liability in this action and makes no representations as to any potential coverage for the claims asserted by Plaintiff in this action. See redacted declaration page of the applicable policy. Upon execution of a mutual confidentiality order, Defendant will provide the applicable excess insurance policy. 4. A copy of Defendant LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLCs design and construction file, including all records relating to the design and construction of all facets and features of the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community, including the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system installed around the pool. RESPONSE: Responsive documents will be produced under a separate cover for the property located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimee, Florida, in the Storey Lake Community (“Property”). 5. Any and all photographs, videos or other visual images relating to the home built at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community from 2015 to present. RESPONSE: Photographs and videos provided by the Osceola County Sheriff’s Office are produced under a separate cover. 6. The minutes of, and records from, any incident review or safety committee or similar meetings relating to the home built at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community from 2015 to present. RESPONSE: None. 2 7. Copies of any and all memoranda, correspondence, reports, emails and any other documents regarding any inspections to the homebuilt at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad as to the term “regarding,” vague as to the phrase “other document,” and not limited in time, as no time frame is provided. Defendant further objects to the extent this Request seeks production of records and/or correspondence protected under the attorney client privilege and/or work product privileges. Notwithstanding the above, inspection records are produced under a separate cover. 8. Copies of any and all memoranda, correspondence, reports, emails and any other documents regarding any complaints against any individuals or entities relating to the homebuilt at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: None. 9. Copies of any and all reports, correspondence, emails, memoranda, violations, charges, tickets, warnings, or any other documents to or from any governmental or regulatory agency relating to the homebuilt at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: None. 10. Any and all documents referring, relating or regarding inspection of the home built at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community, including inspections of the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system pertaining to the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: Inspection reports in Defendant’s possession will be produced under a separate cover. 11. Any and all inspection reports, notes, photographs, videos, charts or other evidence of inspection of the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system pertaining to the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: Inspection reports in Defendant’s possession will be produced under a separate cover. 3 12. Copies of any and all contracts, purchase documents, and deeds between Defendant LEN OT HOLDINGS, LCC and Les Chateaux du Golde regarding the purchase of the home built at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: Responsive documents will be produced under a separate cover. 13. Copies of any and all contracts and/or written agreements between Defendant LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC and any subcontractor regarding the design, development, and construction of the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community, including, the design, development, construction, and installation of the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system installed around the pool.. RESPONSE: None. 14. Copies of any and all contracts and/or written agreements between Defendant LENNAR HOMES, LLC and Defendant LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC relating to the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: None. 15. Copies of any and all contracts and/or written agreements between Defendant LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC and Defendant LENNAR HOMES HOLDINGS, LLC related to the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: None. 16. Copies of any and all contracts and/or written agreements between LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC. and Defendant BOB’S POOL SERVICE, INC. d/b/a BOB’S POOLS AND SCREENS regarding the design, development, and construction of the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community, including, the design, development, construction, and installation of the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system installed around the pool. RESPONSE: None. 17. Copies of any and all contracts and/or written agreements between Defendant LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC and Defendant BOB’S POOLS AND SCREENS, INC. regarding the design, development, and construction of the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community, including, the design, development, construction, and installation of the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, 4 the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system installed around the pool. RESPONSE: None. 18. Copies of any and all contracts and/or written agreements between Defendant LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC. and Defendant HARDSCAPERS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, LLC regarding the design, development, and construction of the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community, including, the design, development, construction, and installation of the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system installed around the pool. RESPONSE: None. 19. Copies of any and all contracts and/or written agreements between Defendant LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC. and Defendant LW SYSTEMS, INC. regarding the design, development, and construction of the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community, including, the design, development, construction, and installation of the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system installed around the pool. RESPONSE: None. 20. Copies of any and all contracts and/or written agreements between Defendant LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC. and Defendant MTCI PRIVATE PROVIDER SERVICES, LLC d/b/a MTCI regarding the design, development, and construction of the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community, including, the design, development, construction, and installation of the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system installed around the pool. RESPONSE: None. 21. Any and all plans, design plans, policies, procedures, and drawings for the home built at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community, including the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system installed around the pool. RESPONSE: Responsive documents will be produced under a separate cover. 22. All correspondence, communications (including electronic), and e-mails, between Defendant, LENNAR HOMES, LLC and Defendant, LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC., or any 5 of its entities or related businesses regarding the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community from 2015 to present. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad, including but not limited to the term “related businesses”, not appropriately limited in time, and to the extent this Request seeks records protected under the attorney client privilege, work product privilege and/or joint defense privilege. Furthermore, this Request, as drafted is unduly burdensome as to its requests for communications and electronically stored information (ESI) as it fails to clearly specify what information is being sought, what specific search term should be included and/or what individuals are involved. Pursuant to Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So. 2d 293 (Fla 4th DCA, 2007), a privilege log will not be provided until such time as the Court rules as to the other objections herein. 23. All correspondence, communications (including electronic), and e-mails, between Defendant, LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC and Defendant, LENNAR HOMES HOLDINGS, LLC, or any of its entities or related businesses regarding the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community from 2015 to present. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad, including but not limited to the term “related businesses”, not appropriately limited in time, and to the extent this Request seeks records protected under the attorney client privilege, work product privilege and/or joint defense privilege. Furthermore, this Request, as drafted is unduly burdensome as to its requests for communications and electronically stored information (ESI) as it fails to clearly specify what information is being sought, what specific search term should be included and/or what individuals are involved. Pursuant to Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So. 2d 293 (Fla 4th DCA, 2007), a privilege log will not be provided until such time as the Court rules as to the other objections herein. 24. All correspondence, communications (including electronic), and e-mails, between Defendant, LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC and Defendant, MTCI PRIVATE PROVIDER SERVICES, LLC. d/b/a MTCI, or any of its entities or related businesses regarding the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community from 2015 to present. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad, including but not limited to the term “related businesses”, not appropriately limited in time, and to the extent this Request seeks records protected under the attorney client privilege, work product privilege and/or joint defense privilege. Furthermore, this Request, as drafted is unduly burdensome as to its requests for communications and electronically stored information (ESI) as it fails to clearly specify what information is being sought, what specific search term should be included and/or what individuals are involved. Pursuant to Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So. 2d 293 (Fla 4th DCA, 2007), a privilege log will not be provided until such time as the Court rules as to the other objections herein. 6 25. All correspondence, communication (including electronic), contracts, and documents. between Defendant, LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC and Defendant, BOB’S POOL SERVICE, INC. D/B/A BOB’S POOLS AND SCREENS, or any of its entities or related businesses regarding the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community from 2015 to present. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad, including but not limited to the term “related businesses”, not appropriately limited in time, and to the extent this Request seeks records protected under the attorney client privilege, work product privilege and/or joint defense privilege. Furthermore, this Request, as drafted is unduly burdensome as to its requests for communications and electronically stored information (ESI) as it fails to clearly specify what information is being sought, what specific search term should be included and/or what individuals are involved. Pursuant to Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So. 2d 293 (Fla 4th DCA, 2007), a privilege log will not be provided until such time as the Court rules as to the other objections herein. 26. All correspondence, communication (including electronic), contracts, and documents. between Defendant, LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC and Defendant, BOB’S POOLS AND SCREENS, INC., or any of its entities or related businesses regarding the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community from 2015 to present. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad, including but not limited to the term “related businesses”, not appropriately limited in time, and to the extent this Request seeks records protected under the attorney client privilege, work product privilege and/or joint defense privilege. Furthermore, this Request, as drafted is unduly burdensome as to its requests for communications and electronically stored information (ESI) as it fails to clearly specify what information is being sought, what specific search term should be included and/or what individuals are involved. Pursuant to Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So. 2d 293 (Fla 4th DCA, 2007), a privilege log will not be provided until such time as the Court rules as to the other objections herein. 27. All correspondence, communication (including electronic), contracts, and documents between Defendant, LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC and Defendant, LW SYSTEMS, INC., or any of its entities or related businesses regarding the homebuilt at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad, including but not limited to the term “related businesses”, not appropriately limited in time, and to the extent this Request seeks records protected under the attorney client privilege, work product privilege and/or joint defense privilege. Furthermore, this Request, as drafted is unduly burdensome as to its requests for communications and electronically stored information (ESI) as it fails to clearly specify what information is being sought, what specific search term should be included and/or what individuals are involved. Pursuant to Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So. 2d 7 293 (Fla 4th DCA, 2007), a privilege log will not be provided until such time as the Court rules as to the other objections herein. 28. All correspondence, communication (including electronic), contracts, and documents between Defendant, LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC and Defendant, HARDSCAPERS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, LLC, or any of its entities or related businesses regarding the homebuilt at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad, including but not limited to the term “related businesses”, not appropriately limited in time, and to the extent this Request seeks records protected under the attorney client privilege, work product privilege and/or joint defense privilege. Furthermore, this Request, as drafted is unduly burdensome as to its requests for communications and electronically stored information (ESI) as it fails to clearly specify what information is being sought, what specific search term should be included and/or what individuals are involved. Pursuant to Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So. 2d 293 (Fla 4th DCA, 2007), a privilege log will not be provided until such time as the Court rules as to the other objections herein. 29. Any and all documents, warnings and notices provided to the owners of the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community regarding the pool safety barrier fence surrounding the pool of the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL RESPONSE: None. 30. Any and all documents which you contend support a cause of action against another defendant in this action or person or entity not named in this action. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad, unduly burdensome, vague and seeks records protected by the attorney client and work product privilege in the manner phrased. Notwithstanding same, discovery is ongoing, and Defendant reserves the right to amend its response. 31. Any and all documents prepared regarding the incident alleged in the complaint, including, but not limited to any incident report or other investigation into the allegations set forth in the complaint. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad, including but not limited to the term “other investigation”, unduly burdensome, vague, and a violation of the attorney client privilege and work product privilege, to the extent it seeks “documents prepared” by this Defendant and its attorneys. Pursuant to Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So. 2d 293 (Fla 4th DCA, 2007), a privilege log will not be provided until such time as the Court rules as to the other objections herein. Notwithstanding the aforementioned objections, see Osceola Sheriff’s Office investigation file produced under a separate cover. 8 32. Any and all photographs, videotapes, surveillance, or audio tapes, diagrams, surveys or other graphic representations of information concerning the home built at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad, vague, not limited in time, as no time frame is provided, and seeks records protected by the attorney client and work product privilege. Pursuant to Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So. 2d 293 (Fla 4th DCA, 2007), a privilege log will not be provided until such time as the Court rules as to the other objections herein. Notwithstanding the aforementioned objections, see produced Osceola County Sheriff’s Office Records. 33. Copies of all bylaws and Articles of Incorporation for Defendant LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad, unduly burdensome, vague and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 34. Any and all rules, regulations, standards, policies, procedures, guidelines or other documents in this Defendant’s possession, custody or control regarding the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system installed around the pool for all homes built in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSES: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad, including the term “regarding”, unduly burdensome, and not limited in scope or time, as no time is provided. Notwithstanding the aforementioned objections, please see contracts and inspection records produced under separate cover concerning the subject property. 35. Any and all rules, regulations, standards, policies, procedures, guidelines or other documents in this Defendant’s possession, custody or control regarding the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system installed around the pool regarding the home built at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSES: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad, including the term “regarding”, unduly burdensome, and not limited in scope or time, as no time is provided. Notwithstanding the aforementioned objections, please see contracts and inspection records produced under separate cover concerning the subject property. 36. Any and all documents referring, regarding, or relating to work and/or repair orders, and completion of same, regarding the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety 9 barrier fence system installed around the pool regarding the home built at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: Responsive documents will be produced under a separate cover. 37. All e-mails and any other type of written correspondence between Defendant LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC and its employees, agents, representatives, independent contractors and subcontractors regarding the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system installed around the pool for all homes built in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad, unduly burdensome, not limited in time, and seeks records protected under the attorney client privilege and work product privileges, in the manner it is phrased. 38. All e-mails and any other type of written correspondence between Defendant LEN OT HOLDINGS, LLC and its employees, agents, representatives, independent contractors and subcontractors regarding the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system installed around the pool regarding the home built at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community from 2015 to present. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as overbroad, unduly burdensome, not limited in time, and seeks records protected under the attorney client privilege and work product privileges. In the manner it is phrased. 39. All work orders, repair orders, repair tickets, completed work orders, completed repair order, completed repair tickets, completed delivery tickets, and other documents related to the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system installed around the pool for all homes built in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: Invoices for work and repairs transmitted by LW Systems, Inc. and Bobs Pool and Screens are provided under a separate cover. 40. All work orders, repair orders, repair tickets, completed work orders, completed repair order, completed repair tickets, completed delivery tickets, and other documents related to the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system installed around the pool regarding the home built at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community. 10 RESPONSE: Invoices for work and repairs transmitted by LW Systems, Inc. and Bobs Pool and Screens are provided under a separate cover. 41. Any and all marketing and sales materials in this Defendant’s possession, custody or control regarding the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as over broad, unduly burdensome, not appropriately limited in time and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 42. Any and all marketing and sales materials in this Defendant’s possession, custody or control regarding the Storey Lake Community from 2015 to present. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as over broad, unduly burdensome, not appropriately limited in time and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 43. Any and all marketing and sales materials in this Defendant’s possession, custody or control regarding the home built at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as over broad, unduly burdensome, not appropriately limited in time and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 44. All certificates of occupancy and completion for the home built at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community. RESPONSE: Responsive documents will be produced under a separate cover. 45. All permits and permit applications related to the design, development, and construction of the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community, including, the design, development, construction, and installation of the doors and sliding glass door leading out to the pool, the pool patio and pool deck system, the brick pavers surrounding the pool, and the pool safety barrier fence system installed around the pool. RESPONSE: Responsive documents will be produced under a separate cover. 46. Any and all documents of other similar instances of drownings in the Storey Lake Community from 2015 to present. 11 RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as over broad, unduly burdensome, not appropriately limited in time or scope and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Notwithstanding the above, none. 47. Any and all documents, emails, correspondence, warnings, notices, and reports relating to pool deck brick pavers coming or becoming lose in all properties within the Storey Lake Community from 2015 to present. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as over broad, unduly burdensome, not appropriately limited in time or scope and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Notwithstanding the above, as it pertains to the subject property, none. 48. Any and all documents of pool deck brick pavers coming or becoming loose in the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community from 2015 to present. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as over broad, unduly burdensome, not appropriately limited in time and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Notwithstanding the above, none. 49. Any and all documents related to any repairs of the pool deck brick pavers in the home located at 4518 Narrative Lane, Kissimmee, FL in the Storey Lake Community from 2015 to present. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as over broad, unduly burdensome, not appropriately limited in time and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Notwithstanding the above, none. 50. Any and all documents related to any repairs of the pool deck brick pavers in all properties within the Storey Lake Community from 2015 to present. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Request as over broad, unduly burdensome, not appropriately limited in time and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Notwithstanding the above, none. 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 30, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished by regular mail pursuant to Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.516 to all parties on the Service List. CALLAHAN & FUSCO, LLC By: /s/ Hitham N. Eldaher Gabriel A. Costa, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 67361 Email: gcosta@callahanfusco.com Hitham N. Eldaher, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 1002734 Email: heldaher@callahanfusco.com 200 SW 1st Avenue, Suite 940 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tel: 877-618-9770 Fax: 954-252-2308 Service Email Address: eserve@callahanfusco.com SERVICE LIST: COUNSEL OF RECORD ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE 13 Stuart N. Ratzan, Esq. Fredrick "Rick" Freedman, Esq. Stuart J. Weissman, Esq. Rick Freedman & Associates, P.A. Kimberly Boldt, Esq. 3350 SW 148th Avenue, Suite 110 Mario R. Giommoni, Esq. Miramar, Florida 33027 Ratzan Weissman & Boldt RickFreedmanlaw@aol.com 2850 Tigertail Avenue, Suite 400 Attorneys for Plaintiff Miami, Florida 33133 stua11@rwblawyers.com stuartw@rwblawvers.com mario@rwblawyers.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Sanaz Alempour, Esq. Carlos B. Salup, Esq Courtney A. Kaiser, Esq. Salup Rodriguez, PLLC. Cole, Scott & Kissane, 2665 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 301 PA Miami, Florida 33133 Lakeside Office Center, Suite CSalup@salupRodirguez.com 500 600 North Pine Island