We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Frank J. Gori Vs. Paul E. Kiebler Iv, Et Al.

Case Last Refreshed: 13 hours ago

Frank J Gori Iv, filed a(n) Breach of Contract - Commercial case represented by Lisa A Kainec, Stephen S Zashin, against 9 On Canal Promote Llc, Camelot East Holdings, Llc, Doe Llc #5 Name Unknown, Farmington Promote, Llc, Fountain Parc Promote, Llc, (total of 35) See All represented by Alexandra V Dattilo, Alex S. Rodger, Anastasia J. Wade, Andrew J Dorman, Brent S Silverman, (total of 10) See All in the jurisdiction of Cuyahoga County, OH, . Cuyahoga County, OH Superior Courts with SHERRIE MIDAY presiding.

Case Details for Frank J Gori Iv v. 9 On Canal Promote Llc , et al.

Filing Date

January 13, 2023

Category

Contract - Other

Last Refreshed

June 16, 2024

Practice Area

Commercial

Filing Location

Cuyahoga County, OH

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Case Outcome Type

Newly Filed

Case Complaint Summary

This complaint is a summons sent to the defendant, Paul E. Kiebler IV, in a lawsuit filed against him by the plaintiff, Frank J. Gori. The plaintiff's attorney, Stephen Szashin, sent the summons to Doe LLC #2, care of Paul E. Kiebler IV, at an addres...

Parties for Frank J Gori Iv v. 9 On Canal Promote Llc , et al.

Plaintiffs

Frank J Gori Iv

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Lisa A Kainec

Stephen S Zashin

Defendants

9 On Canal Promote Llc

Camelot East Holdings, Llc

Doe Llc #5 Name Unknown

Farmington Promote, Llc

Fountain Parc Promote, Llc

Hines Park Promote, Llc

Jody R. Kiebler, As Manager Of Suffolk Acquisition , Llc Highland Park Service Corp.

Mavgun, Llc

Mount Prospect Greens Owner, Llc Co Its Manager Pepper Pike Acquisition Associates

Nottingham Foundation Promote, Llc

Nottingham Racing, Llc

Paul E. Kiebler Iv

Paul E. Kiebler Iv,As Trustee Of The Paul E. Kiebler Revocable Trust

Paul E. Kiebler Revocalbe Trust

Paul E. Kiebler Revocalbe Trust C O Paul E. Kiebler Iv, Trustee

Pepper Pike Acquisition Associates, Llc

Pepper Pike Acquisitions, Llc

Pepper Pike Capital Partners,Llc

Pepper Pike Construction, Llc

Pepper Pike Property Management, Llc

Pepper Pike Staffing, Llc

Pepper Riverbend Promote, Llc

Pepper Warren Harbor Promote,Llc

Pjk Family Management, Llc

Plymouth Promote, Llc

Residences 56 Ventures Llc

Riverbend Promote Investors, Llc

Riverbend Promote, Llc

Southgate Green Promote, Llc

Suffolk Acquisition, Llc

The Suffolk Family Trust

The Suffolk Family Trust C O Paul E Kiebler Iv, Benieficiary C O Jody R. Kiebler, Beneficiary

Town And Country Promote, Llc

Warren Harbor Promote, Llc

Woodlands Equity Holder, Llc

Attorneys for Defendants

Alexandra V Dattilo

Alex S. Rodger

Anastasia J. Wade

Andrew J Dorman

Brent S Silverman

Jack Maib

James A Deroche

Joseph S Simms

Phillip A Ciano

Vincent A Stafford

Case Documents for Frank J Gori Iv v. 9 On Canal Promote Llc , et al.

DEFENDANT DOE LLC ENTITIES' MOTION TO DISMISS FILED 03/17/2023 IS GRANTED. THE COURT HAS CONSIDERED DEFENDANTS' MOTION FILED 03/17/2023, PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED 03/27/2023, PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF FILED 04/14/2023 AND DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF FILED 04/20/2023. DEFENDANTS HAVE MOVED TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CIV. RULE 12(B)(6) AND 12(B)(5). "A MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED TESTS THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE COMPLAINT. THUS, THE MOVANT MAY NOT RELY ON ALLEGATIONS OR EVIDENCE OUTSIDE THE COMPLAINT; SUCH MATTERS MUST BE EXCLUDED, OR THE MOTION MUST BE TREATED AS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. 'THE FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND ITEMS PROPERLY INCORPORATED THEREIN MUST BE ACCEPTED AS TRUE. FURTHERMORE, THE PLAINTIFF MUST BE AFFORDED ALL REASONABLE INFERENCES POSSIBLY DERIVED THEREFROM.' IT MUST APPEAR BEYOND DOUBT THAT PLAINTIFF CAN PROVE NO SET OF FACTS ENTITLING HER TO RELIEF." VOLBERS-KLARICH V. MIDDLETOWN MGMT., 125 OHIO ST.3D 494, 497 (2010), CITING CIV.R. 12(B), QUOTING MITCHELL V. LAWSON MILK CO., 40 OHIO ST.3D 190, 192 (1988), OTHER INTERNAL CITATIONS OMITTED. CIV. R. 15(D) ALLOWS A PLAINTIFF TO NAME A FICTITIOUS DEFENDANT WHEN THE PLAINTIFF KNOWS THE IDENTITY AND WHEREABOUTS OF A DEFENDANT, BUT NOT THE DEFENDANT'S NAME. ERWIN V. BRYAN, 125 OHIO ST.3D 519, 2010-OHIO-2202, U 24, 929 N.E.2D 1019. TO INVOKE CIV. R. 15(D), THE PLAINTIFF MUST IDENTIFY THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT WITH ENOUGH SPECIFICITY THAT PERSONAL SERVICE CAN BE OBTAINED ON THE DEFENDANT. ID., QUOTING VARNO V. BALLY MFG. CO., 19 OHIO ST.3D 21, 24, 19 OHIO B. 18, 482 N.E.2D 342 (1985). PLAINTIFF HAS NAMED FIVE DOE LLC DEFENDANTS IN THE COMPLAINT. THE COURT FINDS THAT PLAINTIFF HAS NOT INDENTIFIED THESE FIVE DEFENDANTS WITH ENOUGH SPECIFICITY THAT PERSONAL SERVICE COULD BE OBTAINED ON THEM. HAVING CONSTRUED THE MATERIAL ALLEGATIONS IN THE PLEADINGS WITH REASONABLE INFERENCES TO BE DRAWN THEREFROM IN FAVOR OF THE NON-MOVING PARTY, THE COURT FINDS THAT PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT DOES NOT STATE FACTS DEMONSTRATING VIABLE CLAIMS FOR RELIEF AS TO THE DOE DEFENDANTS. AS SUCH, THE COURT FINDS THAT DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT IS PROPER AND MOVANTS ARE ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 12(B)(6) NOTICE ISSUED

Date: June 29, 2023

DEFENDANT DOE LLC ENTITIES' MOTION TO DISMISS FILED 03/17/2023 IS GRANTED. THE COURT HAS CONSIDERED DEFENDANTS' MOTION FILED 03/17/2023, PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED 03/27/2023, PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF FILED 04/14/2023 AND DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF FILED 04/20/2023. DEFENDANTS HAVE MOVED TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CIV. RULE 12(B)(6) AND 12(B)(5). "A MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED TESTS THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE COMPLAINT. THUS, THE MOVANT MAY NOT RELY ON ALLEGATIONS OR EVIDENCE OUTSIDE THE COMPLAINT; SUCH MATTERS MUST BE EXCLUDED, OR THE MOTION MUST BE TREATED AS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. 'THE FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND ITEMS PROPERLY INCORPORATED THEREIN MUST BE ACCEPTED AS TRUE. FURTHERMORE, THE PLAINTIFF MUST BE AFFORDED ALL REASONABLE INFERENCES POSSIBLY DERIVED THEREFROM.' IT MUST APPEAR BEYOND DOUBT THAT PLAINTIFF CAN PROVE NO SET OF FACTS ENTITLING HER TO RELIEF." VOLBERS-KLARICH V. MIDDLETOWN MGMT., 125 OHIO ST.3D 494, 497 (2010), CITING CIV.R. 12(B), QUOTING MITCHELL V. LAWSON MILK CO., 40 OHIO ST.3D 190, 192 (1988), OTHER INTERNAL CITATIONS OMITTED. CIV. R. 15(D) ALLOWS A PLAINTIFF TO NAME A FICTITIOUS DEFENDANT WHEN THE PLAINTIFF KNOWS THE IDENTITY AND WHEREABOUTS OF A DEFENDANT, BUT NOT THE DEFENDANT'S NAME. ERWIN V. BRYAN, 125 OHIO ST.3D 519, 2010-OHIO-2202, U 24, 929 N.E.2D 1019. TO INVOKE CIV. R. 15(D), THE PLAINTIFF MUST IDENTIFY THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT WITH ENOUGH SPECIFICITY THAT PERSONAL SERVICE CAN BE OBTAINED ON THE DEFENDANT. ID., QUOTING VARNO V. BALLY MFG. CO., 19 OHIO ST.3D 21, 24, 19 OHIO B. 18, 482 N.E.2D 342 (1985). PLAINTIFF HAS NAMED FIVE DOE LLC DEFENDANTS IN THE COMPLAINT. THE COURT FINDS THAT PLAINTIFF HAS NOT INDENTIFIED THESE FIVE DEFENDANTS WITH ENOUGH SPECIFICITY THAT PERSONAL SERVICE COULD BE OBTAINED ON THEM. HAVING CONSTRUED THE MATERIAL ALLEGATIONS IN THE PLEADINGS WITH REASONABLE INFERENCES TO BE DRAWN THEREFROM IN FAVOR OF THE NON-MOVING PARTY, THE COURT FINDS THAT PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT DOES NOT STATE FACTS DEMONSTRATING VIABLE CLAIMS FOR RELIEF AS TO THE DOE DEFENDANTS. AS SUCH, THE COURT FINDS THAT DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT IS PROPER AND MOVANTS ARE ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 12(B)(6) NOTICE ISSUED

Date: June 29, 2023

Case Events for Frank J Gori Iv v. 9 On Canal Promote Llc , et al.

Type Description
Docket Event REPLY BRIEF FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) FOUNTAIN PARC PROMOTE, LLC(D24) and 9 ON CANAL PROMOTE LLC(D27) PHILLIP A CIANO 0066134 OMITTED PROMOTE DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Docket Event BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED BY P1 FRANK J GORI STEPHEN S ZASHIN 0064557 PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO FOUNTAIN PARC PROMOTE, LLC, MOUNT PROSPECT GREENS OWNER, LLC, AND 9 ON CANAL PROMOTE, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS
Docket Event DEFENDANTS FOUNTAIN PARC PROMOTE, LLC, MOUNT PROSPECT GREEN OWNERS, LLC AND 9 ON CANAL PROMOTE, LLC'S MOTION TO JOIN PROMOTE DEFENDANTS' DECEMBER 5, 2023 MOTION TO DISMISS, FILED 01/30/2024, IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF GRANTED 14 DAYS TO FILE A BRIEF IN OPPOSITION RELATED TO THESE DEFENDANTS. NOTICE ISSUED
Docket Event PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 01/16/2024, IS DENIED. NOTICE ISSUED
Docket Event DEFENDANTS FOUNTAIN PARC PROMOTE, LLC, MOUNT PROSPECT GREEN OWNER, LLC, AND 9 ON CANAL PROMOTE'S REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS, FILED 01/30/2024, IS DENIED. NOTICE ISSUED
Docket Event WAIVER OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS RETURNED SIGNED ON 03/22/2024 WAIVER OF SERVICE FOR FALL CREEK PROMOTE, LLC-3.22.2024
Docket Event PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED MOTION FOR LEAVE INSTANTER TO AMEND CAPTION OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, FILED 01/16/2024, IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. NOTICE ISSUED
Docket Event PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AFFIDAVIT OF REBECCA G. SINGER-MILLER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S DAMAGES UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S 3.6.2024 DEFAULT HEARING, FILED 03/04/2024, IS HELD IN ABEYANCE. NOTICE ISSUED
Docket Event MOTION FOR LEAVE INSTANTER TO AMEND CAPTION OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, FILED 01/16/2024, IS MOOT. PLAINTIFF FILED AN AMENDED MOTION. NOTICE ISSUED
Docket Event CASE CALLED FOR HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS FOUNTAIN PARK PROMOTE AND 9 ON CANAL PROMOTE. PLAINTIFF PRESENT THROUGH COUNSEL. DEFENDANTS PRESENT THROUGH COUNSEL. PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS AGREE TO BIFURCATE THE ISSUES OF LIABILITY AND DAMAGES FOR THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. AS SUCH, PLAINTIFF IS NOT REQUIRED TO FILE A DAMAGES AFFIDAVIT AT THIS TIME. NOTICE ISSUED
See all events

Related Cases in Cuyahoga County

Case

YASMEEN SHYUMA MAXEY-CRAIG vs. GIRARD ELLIS CRAIG
Mar 01, 2024 | DIANE M PALOS | SF | SF | DR-24-398586

Case

ALANA JACKSON-PENNY vs. TERRELL PENNY
Mar 01, 2024 | FRANCINE B GOLDBERG | SF | SF | DR-24-398584

Case

AMY MINOR vs. PATRICK MINOR
Mar 01, 2024 | COLLEEN ANN REALI | SF | SF | DR-24-398583

Case

SHERI L. ANNOTICO vs. ROBERT ANNOTICO
Mar 01, 2024 | COLLEEN ANN REALI | SF | SF | DR-24-398588

Case

JESSICA M. MAZZEI vs. MATTHEW A. MAZZEI
Feb 29, 2024 | COLLEEN ANN REALI | SF | SF | DR-24-398577

Case

CHEIKH D FALL vs. SOKHNA O SECK
Feb 29, 2024 | COLLEEN ANN REALI | OT | OT | DR-24-398580

Case

DANIELLE SOUCEK vs. KYLE M. GREGORY
Feb 29, 2024 | FRANCINE B GOLDBERG | SF | SF | DR-24-398573

Case

RAHMAN JOHNSON SR vs. CHRISTINA JOHNSON
Feb 29, 2024 | FRANCINE B GOLDBERG | OT | OT | DR-24-398578

Case

ALANTE NECAL FOMBY vs. SHAMYRA LADY JOHNSON
Feb 29, 2024 | TONYA R JONES | SF | SF | DR-24-398579

Case

SANTINA V. COOK vs. DE'ANDRE L. COOK
Feb 29, 2024 | FRANCINE B GOLDBERG | GP | GP | DR-24-398576

Case

EYAD ASAAD vs. NATALIA MAHFOUD
Feb 28, 2024 | FRANCINE B GOLDBERG | SF | SF | DR-24-398569

Case

EUPHORIA SPENCER vs. TOMMY SPENCER
Feb 28, 2024 | LESLIE ANN CELEBREZZE | SF | SF | DR-24-398568

Case

ELAINE MOORE vs. ROBERT MOORE IV
Feb 28, 2024 | LESLIE ANN CELEBREZZE | SF | SF | DR-24-398566

Case

TONYA M. REDDING vs. GEORGE E. REDDING
Feb 28, 2024 | DIANE M PALOS | SF | SF | DR-24-398561

Case

CHRISTOPHER WOOD vs. RACHEL WOOD
Feb 28, 2024 | DIANE M PALOS | SF | SF | DR-24-398562

Case

RITA S. DAWSON vs. MARK C. DAWSON
Feb 28, 2024 | COLLEEN ANN REALI | SF | SF | DR-24-398559

Case

RACHEL LEIGH MCCLAIN vs. HENRY BRIAN MCCLAIN
Feb 28, 2024 | COLLEEN ANN REALI | SF | SF | DR-24-398572

Case

DEBRA A. YEAPLES vs. DONALD S. YEAPLES
Feb 28, 2024 | TONYA R JONES | SF | SF | DR-24-398570

Case

BRONIS KOONCE vs. MARCELL ELTON KOONCE
Feb 28, 2024 | DIANE M PALOS | SF | SF | DR-24-398555

Case

ANITA RITONDARO vs. CHRISTOPHER RITONDARO
Feb 28, 2024 | TONYA R JONES | SF | SF | DR-24-398564

Case

ROSE JANZEN vs. RONALD JANZEN JR.
Feb 28, 2024 | COLLEEN ANN REALI | SF | SF | DR-24-398565

Case

CORVADE PORTER vs. LYNETTE PORTER
Feb 28, 2024 | LESLIE ANN CELEBREZZE | SF | SF | DR-24-398571