We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Mhc Acquisition Fund Iv Llc., D/B/A MOUNTAIN VIEW v. Agc Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation, Arkema Inc., Archroma U.S. Inc., Basf Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Ciba Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Chemdesi…

A Torts - Environmental (Water Contamination) case was filed by (Subcribe to view) represented by (Subcribe to view) against (Subscribe to view) in the jurisdiction of Rensselaer County, NY.

Case Details

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)   

Filing Date

March 26, 2024

Last Refreshed

March 29, 2024

Filing Location

Rensselaer County, NY

Category

Torts - Environmental (Water Contamination)

Practice Area

Torts

Matter Type

Toxic,Environmental

Overview

This action arises from the foreseeable contamination of groundwater by the use of

aqueous film-forming foam (“AFFF”) products that contained per- and poly-fluoroalkyl

substances (“PFAS”), including perfluorooctanoic acid (“PFOA”).

PFOA is a fluorosurfactant that repels oil, grease, and water. PFOA, and/or its

chemical precursors, are or were components of AFFF products, which are firefighting suppressant

agents used in training and firefighting activities for fighting Class B fires. Class B fires include

fires involving hydrocarbon fuels such as petroleum or other flammable liquids.

PFOA is mobile, persists indefinitely in the environment, bioaccumulates in

individual organisms and humans, and biomagnifies up the food chain. PFOA is also associated

with multiple and significant adverse health effects in humans, including but not limited to kidney

cancer, testicular cancer, high cholesterol, thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, and pregnancy-

induced hypertension.

At various times from the 1970s through today, Defendants designed,

manufactured, marketed, distributed, and/or sold AFFF products containing PFOA, and/or its

chemical precursors, and/or designed, manufactured, marketed, distributed, and/or sold the

fluorosurfactants and/or perfluorinated chemicals (“PFCs”) contained in AFFF (collectively,

“AFFF/Component Products”).

Defendants designed, manufactured, marketed, distributed, and/or sold

AFFF/Component Products despite knowing that PFAS are toxic, persist indefinitely, and would

be routinely released into the environment during fire protection, training, and response activities,

even when used as directed and intended by Defendants.

Causes of Action

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS RELEVANT TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION

CAUSES OF ACTION

COUNT I: DEFECTIVE DESIGN

COUNT II: FAILURE TO WARN

COUNT III: NEGLIGENCE

COUNT IV: PUBLIC NUISANCE

COUNT V: PRIVATE NUISANCE

COUNT VI: TRESPASS

COUNT VIII: PUNITIVE DAMAGES

Case Complaint Summary

This legal document involves a complaint filed by MHC Acquisition Fund IV LLC against manufacturers of AFFF/Component Products containing PFOA. The complaint alleges negligence in the design, manufacture, sale, labeling, and warning of the produc…...

Parties

Plaintiffs

Mhc Acquisition Fund Iv Llc., D B A Mountain View

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Croner, Andrew William

Defendants

Agc Chemicals Americas Inc.
Amerex Corporation
Archroma U.S. Inc.
Arkema Inc.
Basf Corporation, Individually And As Successor In Interest To Ciba Inc.
Buckeye Fire Equipment Company
Chemdesign Products Inc.
Chemguard Inc.
Chemicals, Inc.
Clariant Corporation , Individually And As Successor In Interest To Sandoz Chemical Corporation
Deepwater Chemicals, Inc.
Doe Defendants 1-20, Fictitious Names Whose Present Identities Are Unknown
Dynax Corporation
Nation Ford Chemical Company
Tyco Fire Products, Lp, Individually And As Successor In Interest To The Ansul Company

Case Documents

SUMMONS COMPLAINT

Date: Mar 26, 2024

Case Events

Type Description
SUMMONS + COMPLAINT

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope

Your free document request was received.

Your request has been received. We will email you this document within 4 business hours.

You have used out of 0 document requests this month.

Continue

Document Requested

You have exceeded your document request limit for this month.

If you need immediate assistance, please contact support@trellis.law

Continue
Docket Refresh Requested

Your docket refresh request has been received. You will receive a notification when the docket is refreshed.

Docket Refresh Requested

A refresh is already in progress.

If you need immediate assistance, please contact support@trellis.law

Continue